[en] Preference for previously seen, unfamiliar objects reflects a memory bias on affective judgment, known as the "mere exposure effect" (MEE). Here, we investigated the effect of time, post-exposure sleep, and the brain hemisphere solicited on preference generalization toward objects viewed in different perspectives. When presented in the right visual field (RVF), which promotes preferential processing in the left hemisphere, same and mirrored exemplars were preferred immediately after exposure. MEE generalized to much dissimilar views after three nights of sleep. Conversely, object presentation in the left visual field (LVF), promoting right hemisphere processing, elicited a MEE for same views immediately after exposure, then for mirror views after sleep. Most importantly, sleep deprivation during the first post-exposure night, although followed by two recovery nights, extinguished MEE for all views in the LVF but not in the RVF. Besides demonstrating that post-exposure time and sleep facilitate the generalization process by which we integrate various representations of an object, our results suggest that mostly in the right hemisphere, sleep may be mandatory to consolidate the memory bias underlying affective preference. These interhemispheric differences tentatively call for a reappraisal of the role of cerebral asymmetries in wake- and sleep-dependent processes of memory consolidation.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Biederman, I. and Gerhardstein, P.C. 1993. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence for 3D viewpoint invariance. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 19: 1162-1182.
Born, J. and Wagner, U. 2004. Awareness in memory: Being explicit about the role of sleep. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8: 242-244.
Bornstein, R.F. 1989. Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychol. Bull. 106: 265-289.
Bornstein, R.F. and D'Agostino, P.R. 1992. Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63: 545-552.
Bornstein, R.F. and D'Agostino, P.R. 1994. The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Soc. Cognit. 12: 103-128.
Burgund, E.D. and Marsolek, C.J. 2000. Viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent object recognition in dissociable neural subsystems. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 7: 480-489.
Butler, L.T. and Berry, D.C. 2004. Understanding the relationship between repetition priming and mere exposure. Br. J. Psychol. 95: 467-487.
Cave, B.C. 1997. Very long-lasting priming in picture naming. Psychol. Sci. 8: 322-325.
Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2d ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Compton, R.J., Williamson, S., Murphy, S.G., and Heller, W. 2002. Hemispheric differences in affective response. Effect of mere exposure. Soc. Cognit. 20: 1-17.
Corbetta, M. and Shulman, G.L. 2002. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3: 201-215.
Curby, K.M., Hayward, G., and Gauthier, I. 2004. Laterality effects in the recognition of depth-rotated novel objects. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4: 100-111.
Drosopoulos, S., Wagner, U., and Born, J. 2005. Sleep enhances explicit recollection in recognition memory. Learn. Mem. 12: 44-51.
Ellis, B.W., Johns, M.W., Lancaster, R., Raptopoulos, P., Angelopoulos, N., and Priest, R.G. 1981. The St. Mary's Hospital sleep questionnaire: A study of reliability. Sleep 4: 93-97.
Gratton, G., Corballis, P.M., and Jain, S. 1997. Hemispheric organization of visual memories. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9: 92-104.
Horne, J.A. and Ostberg, O. 1976. A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Int. J. Chronobiol. 4: 97-110.
Jacoby, L. and Kelley, C. 1987. Unconscious influences of memory for a prior event. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 13: 314-336.
Johnsen, B.H., Laberg, J.C., Eid, J., and Hugdahl, K. 2002. Dichotic listening and sleep deprivation: Vigilance effects. Scand. J. Psychol. 43: 413-417.
Kim, D.J., Lee, H.P., Kim, M.S., Park, Y.J., Go, H.J., Kim, K.S., Lee, S.P., Chae, J.H., and Lee, C.T. 2001. The effect of total sleep deprivation on cognitive functions in normal adult male subjects. Int. J. Neurosci. 109: 127-137.
Koutstaal, W., Wagner, A.D., Rotte, M., Maril, A., Buckner, R.L., and Schacter, D.L. 2001. Perceptual specificity in visual object priming: Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform cortex. Neuropsychologia 39: 184-199.
Kunst-Wilson, W.R. and Zajonc, R.B. 1980. Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science 207: 557-558.
Lawson, R. 2004. Depth rotation and mirror-image reflection reduce affective preference as well as recognition memory for pictures of novel objects. Mem. Cognit. 32: 1170-1181.
Maquet, P., Smith, C., and Stickgold, R., eds. 2003. Sleep and brain plasticity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Marsolek, C.J. 1995. Abstract visual-form representations in the left cerebral hemisphere. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21: 375-386.
Marsolek, C.J. 1999. Dissociable neural subsystems underlie abstract and specific object recognition. Psychol. Sci. 10: 111-118.
Marsolek, C. 2004. Abstractionist versus exemplar-based theories of visual word priming: A subsystems resolution. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 57: 1233-1259.
Marsolek, C.J. and Hudson, T.E. 1999. Task and stimulus demands influence letter-case-specific priming in the right cerebral hemisphere. Laterality 4: 127-147.
Marsolek, C.J., Nicholas, C.D., and Andresen, D.R. 2002. Interhemispheric communication of abstract and specific visual-form information. Neuropsychologia 40: 1983-1999.
Pallesen, S., Johnsen, B.H., Hansen, A., Eid, J., Thayer, J.F., Olsen, T., and Hugdahl, K. 2004. Sleep deprivation and hemispheric asymmetry for facial recognition reaction time and accuracy. Percept. Mot. Skills 98: 1305-1314.
Plihal, W. and Born, J. 1999. Effects of early and late nocturnal sleep on priming and spatial memory. Psychophysiology 36: 571-582.
Posner, M.I. and Petersen, S.E. 1990. The attention system of the human brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 13: 25-42.
Rauchs, G., Desgranges, B., Foret, J., and Eustache, F. 2005. The relationships between memory systems and sleep stages. J. Sleep Res. 14: 132-140.
Rauchs, G., Lebreton, K., Bertran, F., Pélerin, A., Clochon, P., Denise, P., Foret, J., Desgranges, B., and Eustache, F. 2006. Effects of partial sleep deprivation on within- and cross-format priming. Sleep 29: 58-68.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., and Winkielman, P. 2004. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 8: 364-382.
Reingold, E.M. and Merikle, P.M. 1990. On the inter-relatedness of theory and measurement in the study of unconscious processes. Mind Lang. 5: 9-28.
Robertson, E.M., Pascual-Leone, A., and Press, D.Z. 2004. Awareness modifies the skill-learning benefits of sleep. Curr. Biol. 14: 208-212.
Seamon, J.G. and Delgado, M.R. 1999. Recognition memory and affective preference for depth-rotated solid objects: Part-based structural descriptions may underlie the mere exposure effect. Vis. Cognit. 6: 145-164.
Seamon, J.G., Brody, N., and Kauff, D.M. 1983. Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effect of delay between study and test. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 21: 187-189.
Seamon, J.G., McKenna, P.A., and Binder, N. 1998. The mere exposure effect is differentially sensitive to different judgment tasks. Conscious. Cognit. 7: 85-102.
Simons, J.S., Koutstaal, W., Prince, S., Wagner, A.D., and Schacter, D.L. 2003. Neural mechanisms of visual object priming: Evidence for perceptual and semantic distinctions in fusiform cortex. Neuroimage 19: 613-626.
Smith, C. 1995. Sleep states and memory processes. Behav. Brain Res. 69: 137-145.
Springer, S. and Deutsch, G. 1998. Left brain, right brain: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Freeman, New York.
Srinivas, K. 1995. Representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 21: 1019-1036.
Toga, A.W. and Thompson, P.M. 2003. Mapping brain asymmetry. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4: 37-48.
Vuilleumier, P., Henson, R.N., Driver, J., and Dolan, R.J. 2002. Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nat. Neurosci. 5: 491-499.
Wagner, U., Fischer, S., and Born, J. 2002. Changes in emotional responses to aversive pictures across periods rich in slow-wave sleep versus rapid eye movement sleep. Psychosom. Med. 64: 627-634.
Wagner, U., Hallschmid, M., Verleger, R., and Born, J. 2003. Signs of REM sleep dependent enhancement of implicit face memory: A repetition priming study. Biol. Psychol. 62: 197-210.
Walker, M.P. and Stickgold, R. 2006. Sleep, memory, and plasticity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57: 139-166.
Whittlesea, B.W. and Price, J.R. 2001. Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect. Mem. Cognit. 29: 234-246.
Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., and Reber, R. 2003. The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion. (eds. J. Musch and K.C. Klauer), pp. 189-217. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Willems, S. and Van der Linden, M. 2006. Mere exposure effect: A consequence of direct and indirect fluency-preference links. Conscious. Cogn. 15: 323-341.
Willems, S., Van der Linden, M., and Bastin, C. 2006. The contribution of processing fluency to preference: A comparison with familiarity-based recognition. Eur. J. Cognit. Psychol. 19: 119-140.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.