Surgical intervention after transvaginal Prolift mesh repair: retrospective single-center study including 524 patients with 3 years' median follow-up

DE LANDSHEERE, Laurent; Ismail, Sharif; Lucot, Jean-Philippe; Deken, Valérie; Foidart, Jean-Michel; Cosson, Michel

doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.040

Article (Scientific journals)

Surgical intervention after transvaginal Prolift mesh repair: retrospective single-center study including 524 patients with 3 years' median follow-up

DE LANDSHEERE, Laurent; Ismail, Sharif; Lucot, Jean-Philippe et al.

2012 • In American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 206 (1), p. 83.e1-83.e7

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/109515

DOI
10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.040

PubMed
21963098

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

de Lansheere L AJOG 2011.pdf

Publisher postprint (334.01 kB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

complications; pelvic organ prolapse; polypropylene mesh; reoperation; transvaginal mesh; vaginal surgery

Abstract :

[en] Objective The aim of this study was to explore the nature and rate of surgical intervention after transvaginal Prolift mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse. Study Design This was a retrospective study of all patients who underwent Prolift mesh repair between January 2005 and January 2009. Patient data were obtained from medical records, and patients were telephoned to check if they had surgery in other hospitals. Results A total of 600 consecutive patients were identified. Of these, 524 patients (87.3%) were included in the study, with a median follow-up duration of 38 months (range, 15–63). Global reoperation rate was 11.6%. Indications of intervention were surgery for urinary incontinence (6.9%), mesh-related complications (3.6%), or prolapse recurrence (3%). Conclusion The global reoperation rate after transvaginal Prolift mesh repair was 11.6%, with urinary incontinence surgery being the most common indication. Rates of mesh complications and prolapse recurrence are relatively low in an experienced team.

Disciplines :

Reproductive medicine (gynecology, andrology, obstetrics)

Author, co-author :

DE LANDSHEERE, Laurent ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Gynécologie-Obstétrique CHR

Ismail, Sharif

Lucot, Jean-Philippe

Deken, Valérie

Foidart, Jean-Michel ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Gynécologie - Obstétrique

Cosson, Michel

Language :

English

Title :

Surgical intervention after transvaginal Prolift mesh repair: retrospective single-center study including 524 patients with 3 years' median follow-up

Publication date :

2012

Journal title :

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

ISSN :

0002-9378

eISSN :

1097-6868

Publisher :

Mosby, St Louis, United States - Missouri

Volume :

206

Issue :

Pages :

83.e1-83.e7

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 24 January 2012

Statistics

Number of views

92 (5 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

4 (1 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

A.L. Olsen, V.J. Smith, J.O. Bergstrom, J.C. Colling, A.L. Clark Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence Obstet Gynecol 89 1997 501 506
B. Feiner, J.E. Jelovsek, C. Maher Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review BJOG 116 2009 15 24
P. Debodinance, J. Berrocal, H. Clave [Changing attitudes on the surgical treatment of urogenital prolapse: birth of the tension-free vaginal mesh] J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 33 2004 577 588
B. Fatton, J. Amblard, P. Debodinance, M. Cosson, B. Jacquetin Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift technique)a case series multicentric study Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18 2007 743 752
F. Caquant, P. Collinet, P. Debodinance Safety of trans vaginal mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients J Obstet Gynaecol Res 34 2008 449 456
A.L. Milani, P. Hinoul, J.M. Gauld, V. Sikirica, D. Van Drie, M. Cosson Trocar-guided mesh repair of vaginal prolapse using partially absorbable mesh: 1 year outcomes Am J Obstet Gynecol 204 2011 74.e1 74.e8
M. Abdel-Fattah, I. Ramsay Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse BJOG 115 2008 22 30
S. Takahashi, D. Obinata, T. Sakuma Tension-free vaginal mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse: a single-center experience of 310 cases with 1-year follow up Int J Urol 17 2010 353 358
B. Jacquetin, B. Fatton, C. Rosenthal Total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a 3-year prospective follow-up study Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21 2010 1455 1462
R. Hiltunen, K. Nieminen, T. Takala Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 110 2007 455 462
J.N. Nguyen, R.J. Burchette Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 111 2008 891 898
M. Carey, P. Higgs, J. Goh Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial BJOG 116 2009 1380 1386
C.B. Iglesia, A.I. Sokol, E.R. Sokol Vaginal mesh for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 116 2010 293 303
K. Nieminen, R. Hiltunen, T. Takala Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up Am J Obstet Gynecol 203 2010 235.e1 235.e8
C. Maher, B. Feiner, K. Baessler, E.J. Adams, S. Hagen, C.M. Glazener Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010 CD004014
G.B. Diwadkar, M.D. Barber, B. Feiner, C. Maher, J.E. Jelovsek Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review Obstet Gynecol 113 2009 367 373
M.A. Denman, W.T. Gregory, S.H. Boyles, V. Smith, S.R. Edwards, A.L. Clark Reoperation 10 years after surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence Am J Obstet Gynecol 198 2008 555.e1 555.e5
S. Swift, S. Morris, V. McKinnie Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17 2006 615 620
J. De Leval Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out Eur Urol 44 2003 724 730
D. Dindo, N. Demartines, P.A. Clavien Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 2004 205 213
L. De Landsheere, J.P. Lucot, J.M. Foidart, M. Cosson Management of recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence after TVT-O by mesh readjustment Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21 2010 1347 1351
P. Gadonneix, A. Ercoli, G. Scambia, R. Villet The use of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the management of pelvic organ prolapse Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17 2005 376 380
I.E. Nygaard, R. McCreery, L. Brubaker Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review Obstet Gynecol 104 2004 805 823
P. Collinet, F. Belot, P. Debodinance, E. Ha Duc, J.P. Lucot, M. Cosson Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17 2006 315 320
F. Flam Sedation and local anaesthesia for vaginal pelvic floor repair of genital prolapse using mesh Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18 2007 1471 1475
D. Altman, C. Falconer Perioperative morbidity using transvaginal mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair Obstet Gynecol 109 2007 303 308
H.M. Van Raalte, V.R. Lucente, S.M. Molden, R. Haff, M. Murphy One-year anatomic and quality-of-life outcomes after the Prolift procedure for treatment of posthysterectomy prolapse Am J Obstet Gynecol 199 2008 694.e1 694.e6
C. Elmer, D. Altman, M.E. Engh, S. Axelsen, T. Vayrynen, C. Falconer Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse Obstet Gynecol 113 2009 117 126
M.J. Aungst, E.B. Friedman, W.S. Von Pechmann, N.S. Horbach, J.A. Welgoss De novo stress incontinence and pelvic muscle symptoms after transvaginal mesh repair Am J Obstet Gynecol 201 2009 73.e1 73.e7
M.I. Withagen, M.E. Vierhout, A.L. Milani Does trocar-guided tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift) repair provoke prolapse of the unaffected compartments? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21 2010 271 278
J.O. DeLancey Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy Am J Obstet Gynecol 166 1992 1717 1724 discussion 24-8
A. Summers, L.A. Winkel, H.K. Hussain, J.O. DeLancey The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 2006 1438 1443
J.L. Lowder, A.J. Park, R. Ellison The role of apical vaginal support in the appearance of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse Obstet Gynecol 111 2008 152 157
E.D. Lopes, N.L. Lemos, S. Carramao Sda Transvaginal polypropylene mesh versus sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of uterine prolapse: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 21 2010 389 394
S.R. Jackson, N.C. Avery, J.F. Tarlton, S.D. Eckford, P. Abrams, A.J. Bailey Changes in metabolism of collagen in genitourinary prolapse Lancet 347 1996 1658 1661
M.H. Kerkhof, L. Hendriks, H.A. Brolmann Changes in connective tissue in patients with pelvic organ prolapsea review of the current literature Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20 2009 461 474