[en] Nectar drinkers must feed quickly and efficiently due to the threat of predation. While the sweetest nectar offers the greatest ener- getic rewards, the sharp increase of viscosity with sugar concentra- tion makes it the most difficult to transport. We here demonstrate that the sugar concentration that optimizes energy transport depends exclusively on the drinking technique employed. We iden- tify three nectar drinking techniques: active suction, capillary suction, and viscous dipping. For each, we deduce the dependence of the volume intake rate on the nectar viscosity and thus infer an optimal sugar concentration consistent with laboratory mea- surements. Our results provide the first rationale for why suction feeders typically pollinate flowers with lower sugar concentration nectar than their counterparts that use viscous dipping.
Disciplines :
Entomology & pest control Zoology Physics
Author, co-author :
Kim, Wonjung
Gilet, Tristan ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > Micro mécanique
Bush, John W.M.
Language :
English
Title :
Optimal concentrations in nectar feeding
Publication date :
2011
Journal title :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN :
0027-8424
eISSN :
1091-6490
Publisher :
National Academy of Sciences, Washington, United States - District of Columbia
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Kingsolver JG, Daniel TL (1979) On the mechanics and energetics of nectar feeding in butterflies. J Theor Biol 76:167-179.
Pivnick KA, McNeil JN (1985) Effects of nectar concentration on butterfly feeding: Measured feeding rates for Thymelicus lineola (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) and a general feeding model for adult Lepidoptera. Oecologia 66:226-237. (Pubitemid 17244504)
Kingsolver JG, Daniel TL (1983) Mechanical determinants of nectar feeding strategy in hummingbirds: Energetics, tongue morphology, and licking behavior. Oecologia 60:214-226. (Pubitemid 15276029)
Kingsolver JG, Daniel TL (1995) Regulatory Mechanisms in Insect Feeding, eds RF Chapman and G de Boer (Chapman and Hall, New York), pp 32-53.
Paul J, Roces F (2003) Fluid intake rates in ants correlate with their feeding habits. J Insect Physiol 49:347-357. (Pubitemid 36579782)
Pyke GH, Waser NM (1981) The production of dilute nectars by hummingbird and honeyeater flowers. Biotropica 13:260-270. (Pubitemid 13280565)
Daniel TL, Kingsolver JG, Meyhöfer E (1989) Mechanical determinants of nectar-feeding energetics in butterflies: Muscle mechanics, feeding geometry, and functional equivalence. Oecologia 79:66-75.
Harder LD (1986) Effects of nectar concentration and flower depth on flower handling efficiency of bumble bees. Oecologia 69:309-315.
Roubik DW, Buchmann SL (1984) Nectar selection by melipona and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and the ecology of nectar intake by bee colonies in a tropical forest. Oecologia 61:1-10. (Pubitemid 16277120)
McMahon TA, Bonner JT (1983) On Size and Life (Scientific Am Library, New York).
Morrison NJ, Richardson J, Dunn L, Pardy RL (1989) Respiratory muscle performance in normal elderly subjects and patients with copd. Chest 95:90-94. (Pubitemid 19026108)
May PG (1985) Nectar uptake rates and optimal nectar concentrations of two butterfly species. Oecologia 66:381-386.
Hainsworth FR (1973) On the tongue of a hummingbird: its role in the rate and energetics of feeding. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol 46:65-78.
Lee SJ, Kim BH, Lee JY (2009) Experimental study on the fluid mechanics of blood sucking in the proboscis of a female mosquito. J Biomech 42:857-864.
Ewald PW, Williams WA (1982) Function of the bill and tongue in nectar uptake by hummingbirds. Auk 99:573-576.
Roberts WM (1995) Hummingbird licking behavior and the energetics of nectar feeding. Auk 112:456-463.
Quéré D (1999) Fluid coating on a fiber. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 31:347-384.
Borrell BJ (2004) Suction feeding in orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini). Proc R Soc London Ser B 271:S164-S166.
Heyneman AJ (1983) Optimal sugar concentrations of floral nectars - dependence on sugar intake efficiency and foraging costs. Oecologia 60:198-213.
Heinrich B, Raven PH (1972) Energetics and pollination ecology. Science 176:597-602.
Willmer PG, Stone GN (2004) Behavioral, ecological, and physiological determinants of the activity patterns of bees. Adv Study Behav 34:347-466. (Pubitemid 39752300)
Nicolson SW (2007) Nectaries and nectar, eds SW Nicolson, M Nep, and E Pacinir (Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht), pp 289-342.
Rico-Guevara A, Rubega MA (2011) The hummingbird tongue is a fluid trap, not a capillary tube. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:9356-9360.
Boggs CL (1988) Rates of nectar feeding in butterflies: effects of sex, size, age and nectar concentration. Funct Ecol 2:289-295.
Hainsworth FR, Precup E, Hamill T (1991) Feeding, energy processing rates and egg production in painted lady butterflies. J Exp Biol 156:249-265.
Josens RB, Farina WM (2001) Nectar feeding by the hovering hawk moth Macroglossum stellatarum: Intake rate as a function of viscosity and concentration of sucrose solutions. J Comp Physiol 187:661-665. (Pubitemid 33145829)
Stevenson RD (1991) Feeding rates of the tobacco hawkmoth Manduca sexta at artificial flowers. Am Zool 31:57A.
Tamm S, Gass CL (1986) Energy intake rates and nectar concentration preferences by hummingbirds. Oecologia 70:20-23.
Mitchell RJ, Paton DC (1990) Effects of nectar volume and concentration on sugar intake rates of Australian honeyeaters (Meliphagidae). Oecologia 83:238-246.
Köhler A, Leseigneur CDC, Verburgt L, Nicolson SW(2010) Dilute bird nectars: Visocity contrains food intake by licking in a sunbird. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 299:R1068-R1074.
Roces F, Winter Y, von Helversen O (1993) Animal-plant Interactions in Tropical Environments, ed W Barthlott (Museum Koenig, Bonn), pp 159-165.
Borrell BJ (2006) Mechanics of nectar feeding in the orchid bee Euglossa imperialis: Pressure, viscosity and flow. J Exp Biol 209:4901-4907.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.