Universal Service Financing in Competitive Postal Markets: One Size Does Not Fit All

Gautier, Axel; Paolini, Dimitri

doi:10.2202/1446-9022.1227

Download

Article (Scientific journals)

Universal Service Financing in Competitive Postal Markets: One Size Does Not Fit All

Gautier, Axel; Paolini, Dimitri

2011 • In Review of Network Economics, 10 (3), p. 6

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/98800

DOI
10.2202/1446-9022.1227

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Universal Service Financing in Competitive Postal Markets-1.pdf

Publisher postprint (1.25 MB)

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Universal service obligations; compensation fund; market liberalization; cream-skimming

Abstract :

[en] In the postal sector, the financial burden of the universal service depends on its content, the postal market characteristics and the country’s geographical configuration. These three groups of factors affect both the direct cost of providing the service and the extent of competition on the market. In this paper, we consider countries with different geographical characteristics and we show that the choice of an appropriate mechanism to share the burden of universal service between market participants depends on the country configuration. Thus, for universal service financing, one size does not fit all.

Disciplines :

Microeconomics

Author, co-author :

Gautier, Axel ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC-Ecole de gestion : UER > Economie industrielle

Paolini, Dimitri

Language :

English

Title :

Universal Service Financing in Competitive Postal Markets: One Size Does Not Fit All

Publication date :

September 2011

Journal title :

Review of Network Economics

ISSN :

2194-5993

eISSN :

1446-9022

Publisher :

CRA International P/L

Special issue title :

Competition, Pricing and Universal Service in the Postal Sector

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

Art 6

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

http://www.bepress.com/rne/vol10/iss3/6

Available on ORBi :

since 15 September 2011

Statistics

Number of views

274 (19 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

702 (10 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Anderson, S., A. de Palma and B. Kreider (2001), "The efficiency of indirect taxes under imperfect competition", Journal of Public Economics, 81(2), 231-251. (Pubitemid 33626337)
Ambrosini, X., F. Boldron and B. Roy (2006), "Universal Service Obligations in the Postal Sector: Economics Learnings from Cross-Country Comparisons", in M. A. Crew a P. R. Kleindorfer (eds), Progress toward Liberalization of the Postal and Delivery Sector, Springer.
Armstrong, M., C. Doyle and J. Vickers (1996), "The Access Pricing Problem: A Synthesis", Journal of Industrial Economics, 44(1), 131-150.
Bloch, F. and A. Gautier (2008), "Access Pricing and Entry in the Postal Sector", The Review of Network Economics, 7(2), 207-230.
Boldron, F., D. Joram, L. Martin and B. Roy (2006), "From Size of the Box to the Costs of Universal Service Obligation: A Cross-Country Comparison", in M. A. Crew a P. R. Kleindorfer (eds), Liberalization of the Postal and Delivery Sector, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Boldron, F., C. Borsenberger, D. Joram, S. Lecou, and B. Roy (2009), "A Dynamic and Endogenous Approach to Financing the USO in a Liberalized Environment", in M. A. Crew and P. R. Kleindorfer (eds), Progress in the Competitive Agenda in the Postal and Delivery Sector, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Borsenberger, C., H. Cremer, P. De Donder, D. Joram, and B. Roy (2010), "Funding the Cost of Universal Service in a Liberalized Postal Sector", in M. A. Crew and P. R. Kleindorfer (eds), Hightening Competition in the Postal and Delivery Sector, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Choné, P., L. Flochel, and A. Perrot (2002), "Allocating and Funding Universal Service Obligations in a Competitive Market", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(9), 1247-1276.
Cremer, H., A. Grimaud and J.-J. Laffont (2000), "The Cost of Universal Service in the Postal Sector", in Crew, M. A. and P. R. Kleindorfer (eds), Current Directions in Postal Reform, Kluwer Academic Press.
Crew, M. A. and P. R. Kleindorfer (1998), "Efficient Entry, Monopoly and the Universal Service Obligation in Postal Service", Journal of Regulatory Economics, 14(2), 103-125. (Pubitemid 128404757)
D'Alcantara, G. and A. Gautier (2008), "National Postal Strategies after a Full Postal Market Opening", in M. A. Crew and P. R. Kleindorfer (eds), Competition and Regulation in the Postal and Delivery Sector, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
de Bijl, P., E. van Damme and P. Larouche (2006), "Regulating Access to Stimulate Competition in Postal Markets?", in M. A. Crew a P. R. Kleindorfer (eds), Progress toward Liberalization of the Postal and Delivery Sector, Springer.
De Donder, P. (2006), "Access Pricing in the Postal Sector: Theory and Simulations", Review of Industrial Organization, 28(3), 307-326.
De Donder P., H. Cremer, P. Dudley and F. Rodriguez (2006), "A Welfare Analysis of Price Controls with End-to-End Mail and Access Services", in M. A. Crew and P. R. Kleindorfer (eds), Liberalization of the Postal and Delivery Sector, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Gautier, A. and X. Wauthy (2010a), "Price Competition under Universal Service Obligations", International Journal of Economic Theory, 6(3), 311-326.
Gautier, A. and X. Wauthy (2010b), "Competitively Neutral Universal Service Obligations", CORE discussion paper 2010/61.
Heitzler, S. and C. Wey (2010), "Raising Rivals' Fixed (Labor) Costs: The Deutsche Post Case", paper presented at the sixth conference on Regulation, Competition and Universal Service in the Postal Sector, Toulouse, March 2010.
Hoernig, S. (2006), "Should Uniform Pricing Constraints be Imposed on Entrants?", Journal of Regulatory Economics, 30(2), 199-216. (Pubitemid 44198321)
Hooper, R., D. D. Hutton and I. R. Smith (2008), "Modernise or Decline: Policies to Maintain the Universal Postal Service in the United Kingdom", Cm 7529, The Stationery Office, London.
Jaag, C., M. Koller and U. Trinkner (2009), "Calculating the Cost of Universal Service Obligation: The Need for a Global Approach", in M. A. Crew and P. R. Kleindorfer (eds), Progress in the Competitive Agenda in the Postal and Delivery Sector, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Jaag, C. and U. Trinkner (2010), "The Interaction of Universal Service Costing and Financing in the Postal Sector: A Calibrated Approach", Swiss Economics Working Paper 0019.
Mirabel, F., J.-C. Poudou and M. Roland (2009), "Universal Service Obligations: The role of Subsidization Schemes", Information Economics and Policy, 21(1), 1-9.
Oxera (2007), "Funding Universal Service Obligations in the Postal Sector", report prepared for La Poste, De Post-La Poste, Hellenic Post, Poste Italiane, P&T Luxembourg, Correos, Magyar Posta, Cyprus Post, Poczta Polska.
Panzar, J. (1991), "Is Postal Service a Natural Monopoly?", in M. A. Crew a P. R. Kleindorfer (eds), Competition and Innovation in Postal Services, Kluwer Academic Press.
Panzar, J. (2000), "A Methodology for Measuring the Costs of Universal Service Obligations", Information Economics and Policy, 12(3), 211-220.
Pricewaterhouse Coopers (2006), "The Impact on the Universal Service of the Full Market Accomplishment of the Postal Internal Market in 2009", Final report to the European Commission.
Roy, B. (1999), "Technico-Economic Analysis of the Costs of Outside Work in Postal Delivery", in M. A. Crew and P. R. Kleindorfer (eds), Emerging Competition in the Postal and Delivery Services, Kluwer Academic Press.
Valletti, T., S. Hoernig and P. Barros (2002), "Universal Service and Entry: The Role of Uniform Pricing and Coverage Constraints", Journal of Regulatory Economics, 21(2), 169-190. (Pubitemid 37132025)