Article (Scientific journals)
Therapeutic effect of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared with each treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: double-blind randomised controlled trial
Klareskog, L.; van der Heijde, D.; de Jager, J. P. et al.
2004In The Lancet, 363 (9410), p. 675-681
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Malaise_2004_Lancet_675-681.pdf
Publisher postprint (131.12 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Antirheumatic Agents; Immunoglobulin G; Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; TNFR-Fc fusion protein; Methotrexate
Abstract :
[en] Background Etanercept and methotrexate are effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis but no data exist on concurrent initiation or use of the combination compared with either drug alone. We aimed to assess combination treatment with etanercept and methotrexate versus the monotherapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods In a double-blind, randomised, clinical efficacy, safety, and radiographic study, 686 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomly allocated to treatment with etanercept 25 mg (subcutaneously twice a week), oral methotrexate (up to 20 mg every week), or the combination. Clinical response was assessed by criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). The primary efficacy endpoint was the numeric index of the ACR response (ACR-N) area under the curve (AUC) over the first 24 weeks. The primary radiographic endpoint was change from baseline to week 52 in total joint damage and was assessed with the modified Sharp score. Analysis was by intention to treat. Findings Four patients did not receive any drug; thus 682 were studied. ACR-N AUC at 24 weeks was greater for the combination group compared with etanercept alone and methotrexate alone (18.3% years [95% CI 17.1-19.6] vs 14.7%-years [13.5-16.0], p<0.0001, and 12.2%-years [11.0-13.4], p<0.0001; respectively). The mean difference in ACR-N AUC between combination and methotrexate alone was 6.1 (95% CI 4.5-7.8, p<0.0001) and between etanercept and methotrexate was 2.5 (0.8-4.2, p=0.0034). The combination was more efficacious than methotrexate or etanercept alone in retardation of joint damage (mean total Sharp score -0.54 [95% CI -1.00 to -0.07] vs 2.80 [1.08 to 4.51], p<0.0001, and 0.52 [-0.10 to 1.15], p=0.0006; respectively). The mean difference in total Sharp score between combination and methotrexate alone was -3.34 (95% CI -4.86 to -1.81, p<0.0001) and between etanercept and methotrexate was -2.27 (-3.81 to -0.74, p=0.0469). The number of patients reporting infections or adverse events was similar in all groups. Interpretation The combination of etanercept and methotrexate was significantly better in reduction of disease activity, improvement of functional disability, and retardation of radiographic progression compared with methotrexate or etanercept alone. These findings bring us closer to achievement of remission and repair of structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis.
Disciplines :
Rheumatology
General & internal medicine
Author, co-author :
Klareskog, L.
van der Heijde, D.
de Jager, J. P.
Gough, A.
Kalden, J.
Malaise, Michel ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Rhumatologie
Mola, E. M.
Pavelka, K.
Sany, J.
Settas, L.
Wajdula, J.
Pedersen, R.
Fatenejad, S.
Sanda, M.
More authors (4 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Therapeutic effect of the combination of etanercept and methotrexate compared with each treatment alone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: double-blind randomised controlled trial
Publication date :
28 February 2004
Journal title :
The Lancet
ISSN :
0140-6736
eISSN :
1474-547X
Publisher :
Lancet Publishing Group, London, United Kingdom
Volume :
363
Issue :
9410
Pages :
675-681
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 29 June 2011

Statistics


Number of views
73 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
1651
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
1516
OpenCitations
 
1229

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi