Ratio bias; Error rates; Financial incentives; Experiment
Abstract :
[en] The ratio bias—according to which individuals prefer to bet on probabilities
expressed as a ratio of large numbers to normatively equivalent or superior
probabilities expressed as a ratio of small numbers—has recently gained momentum,
with researchers especially in health economics emphasizing the policy importance
of the phenomenon. Although the bias has been replicated several times, some doubts
remain about its economic significance. Our two experiments show that the bias disappears
once order effects are excluded, and once salient and dominant incentives are
provided. This holds true for both choice and valuation tasks. Also, adding context
to the decision problem does not alter this finding. No ratio bias could be found in between-subject tests either, which leads us to the conclusion that the policy relevance
of the phenomenon is doubtful at best.
Disciplines :
Microeconomics
Author, co-author :
Lefebvre, Mathieu ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC-Ecole de gestion : UER > Economie politique et finances publiques
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
M. Abdellaoui 2000 Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions Management Science 46 1 1497 1512 10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1497. 12080
Abdellaoui, M.; Baillon, A.; Placido, L.; & Wakker, P. P. (2010). The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. American Economic Review, forthcoming.
M. Abdellaoui H. Bleichrodt O. L'Haridon 2008 A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 36 245 266 10.1007/s11166-008-9039-8
R. C. Battalio J. H. Kagel K. Jiranyakul 1990 Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3 25 50 10.1007/BF00213259
H. Bleichrodt J. L. Pinto 2000 A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis Management Science 46 11 1485 1496 10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1485.12086
P. Bohm 1994 Time preference and preference reversal among experienced subjects: The effects of real payments The Economic Journal 104 1370 1378 10.2307/2235453
C. Bonner B. R. Newell 2008 How to make a risk seem riskier: The ratio bias versus construal level theory Judgment and Decision Making 3 5 411 416
A. Booij B. M. S. van Praag G. van de Kuilen 2010 A parametric analysis of prospect theory's functionals for the general population Theory and Decision 68 1-2 115 148 10.1007/s11238-009-9144-4
C. F. Camerer R. M. Hogarth 1999 The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19 1 7 42 10.1023/A:1007850605129
R. P. Cubitt A. Munro C. Starmer 2004 Testing explanations of preference reversal The Economic Journal 114 709 726 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00238.x (Pubitemid 39000739)
D. Dale J. Rudski A. Schwarz E. Smith 2007 Innumeracy and incentives: A ratio bias phenomenon Judgment and Decision Making 2 4 243 250
V. Denes-Raj S. Epstein 1994 Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against third better judgment Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 5 819 829 10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.819
V. Denes-Raj S. Epstein J. Cole 1995 The generality of the ratio-bias phenomenon Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 1083 1092 10.1177/01461672952110009
D. Ellsberg 1961 Risk, ambiguity and the savage axioms Quarterly Journal of Economics 75 4 643 669 10.2307/1884324
H. Fehr-Duda A. Bruhin T. F. Epper R. Schubert 2010 Rationality on the rise: Why relative risk aversion increases with stake size Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 40 2 147 180 10.1007/s11166-010-9090-0
G. Fellner M. Sutter 2009 Causes, consequences, and cures of myopic loss aversion-An experimental investigation The Economic Journal 119 537 900 916 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02251.x
D. Frisch J. Baron 1988 Ambiguity and rationality Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1 149 157 10.1002/bdm.3960010303
A.G. Greenwald 1978 Within-subject designs: To use or not to use? Psychological Bulletin 83 314 320 10.1037/0033-2909.83.2.314
Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In: K. Kremer & V. Macho (Eds.),Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003 (pp. 79-93). GWDG Bericht 63. Göttingen: Ges. für Wiss, Datenverarbeitung.
Griggs R. A. (1995) The effects of rule clarification, decision justification, and selection instruction on Wason's abstract selection task. In: Newstead S. E.; Evans (Eds.) J. St. B. T. (eds) Perspectives on thinking and reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove
G. W. Harrison M. I. Lau M. B. Williams 2002 Estimating individual discount rates in Denmark: A field experiment American Economic Review 92 1606 1617 10.1257/000282802762024674
R. Hertwig A. Ortmann 2001 Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 383 451
J. D. Hey J. Lee 2005 Do subjects separate (or are they sophisticated)? Experimental Economics 8 233 265 10.1007/s10683-005-1465-8 (Pubitemid 41240131)
R. M. Hogarth H. Kunreuther 1989 Risk, ambiguity and insurance Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2 5 35 10.1007/BF00055709
C.A. Holt S.K. Laury 2002 Risk aversion and incentive effects American Economic Review 92 1644 1655 10.1257/000282802762024700
S. Huck G. Weizsäcker 1999 Risk, complexity, and deviations from expected-value maximization: Results of a lottery choice experiment Journal of Economic Psychology 20 6 699 715 10.1016/S0167-4870(99)00031-8
D. Kahneman A. Tversky 1979 Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47 2 263 291 10.2307/1914185
L. A. Kirkpatrick S. Epstein 1992 Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: Further evidence for two conceptual systems Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 4 534 544 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.534
V. Köbberling P. P. Wakker 2005 An index of loss aversion Journal of Economic Theory 122 119 131 10.1016/j.jet.2004.03.009 (Pubitemid 40465092)
Kocher, M. G.; & Trautmann, S. T. (2008). Selection in markets for risky and ambiguous prospects. Working Paper.
J. Lee 2008 The effect of the background risk in a simple chance improving decision model Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 36 19 41 10.1007/s11166-007-9028-3
Lefebvre, M.; Vieider, F. M.; & Villeval, M. C. (2009). A note on the effect of between subject stake variations on risk attitude. GATE Working Paper 2009-26, Lyon.
S. Lichtenstein P. Slovic 1971 Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 1 46 55 10.1037/h0031207
D. T. Miller W. Turnbull C. McFarland 1989 When a coincidence is suspicious: The role of mental simulation Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 4 581 589 10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.581
M. W. Minor 1970 Experimenter-expectancy effect as a function of evaluation apprehension Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 15 4 326 332 10.1037/h0029612
M. G. Myagkov C. R. Plott 1997 Exchange economies and loss exposure: Experiments exploring prospect theory and competitive equilibria in market environments American Economic Review 87 801 828 (Pubitemid 127454232)
R. Pacini S. Epstein 1999 The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 6 972 987 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972
J.-L. Pinto-Prades J.-E. Martinez-Perez J.-M. Abellán- Perpiñán 2006 The influence of the ratio bias phenomenon on the elicitation of health states utilities Judgment and Decision Making 1 2 118 133
A. G. Sawyer 1975 Demand artifacts in laboratory experiments in consumer research Journal of Consumer Research 1 4 20 30 10.1086/208604
U. Schmidt H. Zank 2005 What is loss aversion? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 30 2 157 167 10.1007/s11166-005-6564-6 (Pubitemid 40579638)
V. L. Smith 1982 Microeconomic systems as an experimental science The American Economic Review 72 5 923 955
C. Starmer R. Sugden 1991 Does the random-lottery incentive system elicit true preferences? An experimental investigation American Economic Review 81 971 978
S. T. Trautmann F. M. Vieider P. P. Wakker 2008 Causes of ambiguity aversion: Known versus unknown preferences Journal of Risk and Uncertainly 36 225 243 10.1007/s11166-008-9038-9
Y. Trope N. Liberman 2003 Temporal construal Psychological Review 110 403 421 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403 (Pubitemid 37189432)
A. Tversky D. Kahneman 1992 Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 297 323 10.1007/BF00122574
A. Tversky R. H. Thaler 1990 Preference reversals Journal of Economic Perspectives 4 2 201 211
Vieider, F. M. (2009). Separating real incentives and accountability. Tinbergen Discussion Paper.
N. D. Wilcox 1993 Lottery choice: Incentives, complexity, and decision time Economic Journal 103 421 1392 1417 10.2307/2234473
K. Yamagishi 1997 When a 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for Risk Communication Applied Cognitive Psychology 11 495 506 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199712)11:6<495::AID-ACP481>3.0.CO;2-J (Pubitemid 127523258)
H. Zank 2010 On probabilities and loss aversion Theory and Decision 68 3 243 261 10.1007/s11238-008-9117-z
Zeiliger, R. (2000). A presentation of regate, Internet based software for experimental economics, http://www.gate.cnrs.fr/~zeiliger/regate/ RegateIntro.ppt, GATE. Lyon: GATE.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
