You are here:
| Reference : Comparison of Data Transfer Methods between two different meshes |
| Scientific congresses and symposiums : Paper published in a book | |||
| Engineering, computing & technology : Mechanical engineering | |||
| http://hdl.handle.net/2268/90322 | |||
| Comparison of Data Transfer Methods between two different meshes | |
| English | |
Bussetta, Philippe  [Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > LTAS-Mécanique numérique non linéaire >] | |
| Ponthot, Jean-Philippe [Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > LTAS-Mécanique numérique non linéaire >] | |
| Jun-2011 | |
| Proceedings of "IV International Conference on Computational Methods for Coupled Problems in Science and Engineering" | |
| No | |
| No | |
| International | |
| IV International Conference on Computational Methods for Coupled Problems in Science and Engineering | |
| 20-22 June 2011 | |
| ECCOMAS | |
| Kos | |
| Greece | |
| [en] Data Transfer Method ; Weak Form ; Mortar Element ; Finite Element ; Finite Volume | |
| [en] Many problems solved with the finite element method require more than one mesh (i.e. one specific mesh for each Physic or a remeshing is needed). The Data Transfer Method used, has a great importance in the capacity to solve the problem and in the reliability of the solution. In general, the data is composed of two kinds of fields (defined thanks to the nodal values or at the integration points).
In this paper, the more used Data Transfer Method is compared with the Data Transfer Methods based on a Weak Form (using Mortar Element or Finite Volume). | |
| the Walloon Region | |
| the STIRHETAL project (WINNOMAT program, convention number 0716690) | |
| Researchers ; Professionals ; Students | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/2268/90322 |
| File(s) associated to this reference | ||||||||||||||
|
Fulltext file(s):
| ||||||||||||||
All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.
