[en] OBJECTIVES: To compare retrograde filling cystometry at infusion rates of 5, 10, and 20 mL/min with diuresis cystometry for determination of an appropriate infusion rate and to confirm the reproducibility of measurements obtained by urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) and cystometry in female Beagles. ANIMALS: Adult female Beagles. PROCEDURE: Successive UPP and cystometry were performed by use of a water perfusion catheter on dogs anesthetized with propofol. Dogs randomly underwent each of the following at 1-week intervals: retrograde filling cystometry at 5, 10, and 20 mL/min, and diuresis cystometry. The maximum urethral pressure and closure pressure, functional and anatomic profile lengths, threshold pressure, threshold volume, and compliance were measured. RESULTS: For each UPP variable, significant differences were found among dogs, but no significant differences were found in intra- or interstudy measurements for individual dogs. For retrograde filling cystometry, threshold pressure was not significantly different between a 5 and 10 mL/min infusion rate. Threshold pressure was significantly higher during retrograde filling cystometry at 20 mL/min, compared with 5 and 10 mL/min, and was associated with bladder wall damages. Threshold pressure was significantly lower during diuresis cystometry, compared with retrograde filling cystometries. Threshold volume and compliance were not significantly different among retrograde filling cystometries but were significantly higher during diuresis cystometry. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Retrograde filling cystometry at 20 mL/min leads to unacceptable sudden increase in threshold bladder pressure. Retrograde filling cystometry at 10 mL/min can be recommended in a clinical setting, shortening the anesthesia time. However, diuresis cystometry approximates physiologic bladder filling most accurately
Disciplines :
Veterinary medicine & animal health
Author, co-author :
Hamaide, Annick ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département clinique des animaux de compagnie et des équidés > Chirurgie des Petits Animaux
Verstegen, John
Snaps, Frédéric ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département clinique des animaux de compagnie et des équidés > Imagerie médicale
Onclin, Karine
Balligand, Marc ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département clinique des animaux de compagnie et des équidés > Chirurgie des petits animaux
Language :
English
Title :
Validation and comparison of the use of diuresis cystometry and retrograde filling cystometry at various infusion rates in female Beagle dogs
Publication date :
2003
Journal title :
American Journal of Veterinary Research
ISSN :
0002-9645
eISSN :
1943-5681
Publisher :
American Veterinary Medical Association, Schaumburg, United States - Illinois
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Holt PE, Gibbs C, Wathes CM. Simultaneous urethral pressure profilometry using a microtip transducer catheter in the bitch: effects of bitch position and transducer orientation. Neurourol Urodyn 1990;9:281-296.
Anderson RS, Sheperd AM, Feneley RCL. Microtransducer urethral profile methodology: variations caused by transducer orientation. J Urol 1983;130:727-728.
van Geelen JM, Doesburg WH, Martin CB. Female urethral pressure profile: reproducibility, axial variation and effects of low dose oral contraceptives. J Urol 1984;131:394-398.
Arnold S, Chew DJ, Hubler M, et al. Reproducibility of urethral pressure profiles in clinically normal sexually intact female dogs by use of microtransducer catheters. Am J Vet Res 1993;54:1347-1351.
Holt PE. Simultaneous urethral pressure profilometry using microtip transducer catheters in the bitch: a comparison of catheter material. J Small Anim Pract 1990;31:431-436.
Combrisson H, Robain G, Cotard JP. Comparative effects of xylazine and propofol on the urethral pressure profile of healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993;54:1986-1989.
Rawlings CA, Barsanti JA, Chernosky AM, et al. Results of cystometry and urethral pressure profilometry in dogs sedated with medetomidine or xylazine. Am J Vet Res 2001;62:167-170.
Richter KP, Ling GV. Effects of xylazine on the urethral pressure profile of healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1985;46:1881-1886.
Gregory SP, Holt PE, Parkinson TJ. Comparison of two catheter withdrawal speeds during simultaneous urethral pressure profilometry in anesthetized bitches. Am J Vet Res 1992;53:355-358.
Holt PE. Simultaneous urethral pressure profilometry in the bitch: methodology and reproducibility of the technique. Res Vet Sci 1989;47:110-116.
Nickel RF, van den Brom WE. Simultaneous diuresis cystourethrometry and multichannel urethral pressure profilometry in continent female dogs. Am J Vet Res 1996;57:1131-1136.
Lappin MR, Barsanti JA. Urinary incontinence secondary to idiopathic detrusor instability: cystometrographic diagnosis and pharmacologic management in two dogs and a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987;191:1439-1442.
van Venrooij G, Kamphuis ET, Wolfhagen M. Diuresis cystometry versus filling cystometry: the diagnosis value of diuresis cystometry in patients with frequency, urgency, and/or urge incontinence complaints. Neurourol and Urodyn 1987;6:29-36.
Oliver JE Jr, Young WO. Evaluation of pharmacologic agents for restraint in cystometry in the dog and cat. Am J Vet Res 1973;34:665-668.
Moreau PM, Lees GE, Gross DR. Simultaneous cystometry and uroflowmetry (micturition study) for evaluation of the caudal part of the urinary tract in dogs: studies of the technique. Am J Vet Res 1983;44:1769-1773.
O'Donnell PD. Pitfalls of urodynamic testing. Urol Clin North Am 1991;18(2):257-268.
Penders L, de Leval J, Petit R. L'instabilité urétrale: diagnostic et signification clinique. J Urol (Paris) 1984;90:385-393.
Scotti RJ, Myers DL. A comparison of the cough stress test and single-channel cystometry with multichannel urodynamic evaluation in genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:430-433.
Swift SE, Ostergard DR. Evaluation of current urodynamic testing methods in the diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:85-91.
Barsanti JA. Tests of lower urinary tract function in dogs and cats. In: Osborne CA, Finco DR, eds. Canine and feline nephrology and urology. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co, 1995;316-328.
Rawlings CA, Coates JR, Chernosky A, et al. Stress leak point pressures and urethral pressure profile tests in clinically normal female dogs. Am J Vet Res 1999;60:676-678.
Nickel RF, van den Brom W. Simultaneous diuresis cystourethrometry and multi-channel urethral pressure profilometry in female dogs with refractory urinary incontinence. Am J Vet Res 1997;58:691-696.
Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996;1-125.
Johnston S, Root Kustritz M, Olson P. Vaginal cytology. In: Canine and feline theriogenology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2001;32-40.
Lentner C. Statistical methods. In: Introduction to statistics. Basel, Switzerland: Ciba-Geigy Corp, 1982;182-236.
Paddleford R. Anesthetic agents. In: Paddleford R, ed. Manual of small animal anesthesia. New York: WB Saunders Co, 1999;31-77.
International Continence Society. First report on the standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Br J Urol 1976;48:39-42.
Kahveci FC, Kahveci N, Alkan T, et al. Propofol versus isoflurane anesthesia under hypothermic conditions: effects on intracranial pressure and local cerebral blood flow after diffuse traumatic brain injury in the rat. Surg Neurol 2001;56:206-214.
Bufalari A, Miller SM, Giannoni C, et al. The use of propofol as an induction agent for halothane and isoflurane anesthesia in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1998;34:84-91.
Rud T, Andersson KE, Asmussen M, et al. Factors maintaining the intraurethral pressure in women. Invest Urol 1980;17:343-347.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.