MRI; horses; foot; magnetic field; low-field; high-field
Abstract :
[en] Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become an important diagnostic tool in the investigation of foot pain in horses. The aim of this study was to qualitatively compare ex-vivo MR images of the same equine feet obtained at three magnetic field strengths: 0.27, 1.5, and 3 tesla (T). Ten cadaver feet were used. All feet were imaged with two high-field (HF) systems (3T, 1.5T) and with a low-field (LF) system at 0.27T designed for standing horses. Images were acquired using similar pulse sequences in all 3 MR units. MR images were subjectively evaluated by three independent experienced image analysts for image quality and clarity of visualization of individual anatomical structures using a four-point grading scale. The images from all of the examinations were considered to be of diagnostic value except for the hoof capsule where substantial artifacts were present in LF images with distortion and loss of signal at the dorsal/distal aspect of the hoof capsule in LF images. Anatomical structure scoring values of images obtained at 3T and 1.5T were significantly greater than scores of images obtained at 0.27T. Scores for images obtained at 3T were significantly higher than those for images obtained at 1.5T. Mean score differences between 1.5T and 3T were higher for cartilage of the distal interphalangeal joint and for the ungular cartilages.
Disciplines :
Veterinary medicine & animal health
Author, co-author :
Bolen, Géraldine ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département clinique des animaux de compagnie et des équidés > Département clinique des animaux de compagnie et des équidés
Audigié, Fabrice
Spriet, Mathieu
Vandenberghe, Filip
Busoni, Valeria ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département clinique des animaux de compagnie et des équidés > Imagerie médicale
Language :
English
Title :
Qualitative comparison of 0.27T, 1.5T and 3T Magnetic Resonance Images of the normal equine foot.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Colles C. Navicular disease and its treatment. In Pract 4 (1982) 29-36
Dyson S. Navicular disease and other soft tissue causes of palmar foot pain. In: Ross M., and Dyson S. (Eds). Diagnosis and management of lameness in the horse (2003), Saunders, St Louis, MO 286-299
Dyson S. Primary lesions of the deep digital flexor tendon within the hoof capsule. In: Ross M., and Dyson S. (Eds). Diagnosis and management of lameness in the horse (2003), Saunders, St Louis, MO 305-309
Whitton R.C., Buckley C., Donovan T., Wales A.D., and Dennis R. The diagnosis of lameness associated with distal limbpathology in a horse: a comparison of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Vet J 155 (1998) 223-229
Widmer W.R., Buckwalter K.A., Fessler J.F., Hill M.A., Med B.V., Vansickle D.C., et al. Use of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of navicular syndrome in the horse. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 41 (2000) 108-116
Tucker R.L., and Sande R.D. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the equine musculoskeletal conditions. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 17 (2001) 145-157 Vii
Dyson S., Murray R., Schramme M., and Branch M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine foot: 15 horses. Equine Vet J 35 (2003) 18-26
Dyson S., Murray R., Schramme M., and Branch M. Lameness in 46 horses associated with deep digital flexor tendonitis in the digit: diagnosis confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging. Equine Vet J 35 (2003) 681-690
Murray R.C., Dyson S.J., Schramme M.C., Branch M., and Woods S. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine digit with chronic laminitis. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 44 (2003) 609-617
Dyson S., Murray R., Schramme M., and Branch M. Collateral desmitis of the distal interphalangeal joint in 18 horses (2001-2002). Equine Vet J 36 (2004) 160-166
Zubrod C.J., Schneider R.K., Tucker R.L., Gavin P.R., Ragle C.A., and Farnsworth K.D. Use of magnetic resonance imaging for identifying subchondral bone damage in horses: 11 cases (1999-2003). J Am Vet Med Assoc 224 (2004) 411-418
Busoni V., Heimann M., Trenteseaux J., Snaps F., and Dondelinger R.F. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in the equine deep digital flexor tendon and distal sesamoid bone in advanced navicular disease--an ex vivo study. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 46 (2005) 279-286
Dyson S., Murray R., and Schramme M. Lameness associated with foot pain: results of magnetic resonance imaging in 199 horses (January 2001-December 2003) and response to treatment. Equine Vet J 37 (2005) 113-121
Kinns J., and Mair T.S. Use of magnetic resonance imaging to assess soft tissue damage in the foot following penetrating injury in 3 horses. Equine Vet Educ 17 (2005) 69-73
Mair T.S., and Kinns J. Deep digital flexor tendonitis in the equine foot diagnosed by low-field magnetic resonance imaging in the standing patient: 18 cases. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 46 (2005) 458-466
Zubrod C.J., Farnsworth K.D., Tucker R.L., and Ragle C.A. Injury of the collateral ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint diagnosed by magnetic resonance. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 46 (2005) 11-16
Murray R.C., Schramme M.C., Dyson S.J., Branch M.V., and Blunden T.S. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of the foot in horses with palmar foot pain and control horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 47 (2006) 1-16
Murray R.C., Blunden T.S., Schramme M.C., and Dyson S.J. How does magnetic resonance imaging represent histologic findings in the equine digit?. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 47 (2006) 17-31
Dyson S., and Murray R. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of 264 horses with foot pain: the podotrochlear apparatus, deep digital flexor tendon and collateral ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint. Equine Vet J 39 (2007) 340-343
Dyson S., and Murray R. Use of concurrent scintigraphic and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation to improve understanding of the pathogenesis of injury of the podotrochlear apparatus. Equine Vet J 39 (2007) 365-369
Sherlock C.E., Kinns J., and Mair T.S. Evaluation of foot pain in the standing horse by magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Rec 161 (2007) 739-744
Cohen J.M., Schneider R.K., Zubrod C.J., Sampson S.N., and Tucker R.L. Desmitis of the distal digital annular ligament in seven horses: MRI diagnosis and surgical treatment. Vet Surg 37 (2008) 336-344
Dyson S., Blunden T., and Murray R. The collateral ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint: magnetic resonance imaging and post mortem observations in 25 lame and 12 control horses. Equine Vet J 40 (2008) 538-544
Nagy A., Dyson S.J., and Murray R.M. Radiographic, scintigraphic and magnetic resonance imaging findings in the palmar processes of the distal phalanx. Equine Vet J 40 (2008) 57-63
Gutierrez-Nibeyro S.D., White N.A., Werpy N.M., Tyrrell L., Allen K.A., Sullins K.E., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of desmopathy of the collateral ligaments of the equine distal interphalangeal joint. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 50 (2009) 21-31
Kraft S.L., and Gavin P. Physical principles and technical considerations for equine computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 17 (2001) 115-130 vii
Werpy N.M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine patient: a comparison of high- and low-field systems. Clin Tech Equine Pract 6 (2007) 37-45
Denoix J.-M., Crevier N., Roger B., and Lebas J.-F. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine foot. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 34 (1993) 405-411
Kleiter M., Kneissl S., Stanek C., Mayrhofer E., Baulain U., and Deegen E. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging techniques in the equine digit. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 40 (1999) 15-22
Busoni V., and Snaps F. Effect of deep digital flexor tendon orientation on magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity in isolated equine limbs--the magic angle effect. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 43 (2002) 428-430
Busoni V., Snaps F., Trenteseaux J., and Dondelinger R.F. Magnetic resonance imaging of the palmar aspect of the equine podotrochlear apparatus: normal appearance. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 45 (2004) 198-204
Mair T.S., Kinns J., Jones R.D., and Bolas N.M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the distal limb of the standing horse. Equine Vet Educ 17 (2005) 74-78
Spriet M., Mai W., and McKnight A. Asymmetric signal intensity in normal collateral ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint in horses with a low-field MRI system due to the magic angle effect. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 48 (2007) 95-100
Smith M.A., Dyson S.J., and Murray R.C. Is a magic angle effect observed in the collateral ligaments of the distal interphalangeal joint or the oblique sesamoidean ligaments during standing magnetic resonance imaging?. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 49 (2008) 509-515
Spriet M., and McKnight A. Characterization of the magic angle effect in the equine deep digital flexor tendon using a low-field magnetic resonance system. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 50 (2009) 32-36
Zubrod C.J., and Barrett M.F. Magnetic resonance imaging of tendon and ligament injuries. Clin Tech Equine Pract 6 (2007) 217-229
Sherlock C., Mair T.S., and Ter Braake F. Osseous lesions in the metacarpo(tarso)phalangeal joint diagnosed using low-field magnetic resonance imaging in standing horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 50 (2009) 13-20
Tapprest J, Radier C, Anglade MC, Mathieu D, Audigié F, Denoix JM. Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of cartilage and subchondral bone lesions in the horse: comparison of low-field (0.2T) VS high-field (1.5T) imaging. In: Proceedings of International Veterinary Radiology Association Congress IVRA; 2003:27: Midrand, South Africa.
Woertler K., Strothmann M., Tombach B., and Reimer P. Detection of articular cartilage lesions: experimental evaluation of low- and high-field-strength MR imaging at 0.18 and 1.0 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 11 (2000) 678-685
Fischbach F., Bruhn H., Unterhauser F., Ricke J., Wieners G., Felix R., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of medium T2-weighted fast spin echo, T1-weighted two-dimensional and three-dimensional gradient echo pulse sequences. Acta Radiol 46 (2005) 67-73
Masi J.N., Sell C.A., Phan C., Han E., Newitt D., Steinbach L., et al. Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a Porcine Model. Radiology 236 (2005) 140-150
Saupe N., Pfirrmann C.W., Schmid M.R., Schertler T., Manestar M., and Weishaupt D. MR imaging of cartilage in cadaveric wrists: comparison between imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T and gross pathologic inspection. Radiology 243 (2007) 180-187
Bauer J.S., Barr C., Henning T.D., Malfair D., Ma C.B., Steinbach L., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the ankle at 3.0 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla in human cadaver specimens with artificially created lesions of cartilage and ligaments. Invest Radiol 43 (2008) 604-611
Bolen G, Haye D, Dondelinger R, Busoni V. Changes during time in MR images of isolated equine limbs refrigerated at 4°C. In: Proceedings of International Veterinary Radiology Association Congress; 2009.
Hart Jr. H., Bottomley P., Edelstein W., Karr S., Leue W., Mueller O., et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: contrast-to-noise ratio as a function of strength of magnetic field. Am J Roentgenol 141 (1983) 1195-1201
Maubon A.J., Ferru J.M., Berger V., Soulage M.C., DeGraef M., Aubas P., et al. Effect of field strength on MR images: comparison of the same subject at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 T. Radiographics 19 (1999) 1057-1067
Rutt B., and Lee D. The impact of field strength on image quality in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 6 (1996) 57-62
Vetter D., and Kastler B. Facteurs de qualité de l'image en IRM. In: Kastler B., Vetter D., Patay Z., and Germain P. (Eds). Comprendre l'IRM, manuel d'auto-apprentissage (2003), Masson, Paris, France 115-131
Niitsu M., Nakai T., Ikeda K., Tang G.Y., Yoshioka H., and Itai Y. High-resolution MR imaging of the knee at 3 T. Acta Radiol 41 (2000) 84-88
Saupe N., Prussmann K.P., Luechinger R., Bosiger P., Marincek B., and Weishaupt D. MR imaging of the wrist: comparison between 1.5- and 3-T MR imaging--preliminary experience. Radiology 234 (2005) 256-264
Cotten A., Delfaut E., Demondion X., Lapegue F., Boukhelifa M., Boutry N., et al. MR imaging of the knee at 0.2 and 1.5 T: correlation with surgery. Am J Roentgenol 174 (2000) 1093-1097
Ejbjerg B.J., Narvestad E., Jacobsen S., Thomsen H.S., and Ostergaard M. Optimised, low cost, low field dedicated extremity MRI is highly specific and sensitive for synovitis and bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist and finger joints: comparison with conventional high field MRI and radiography. Ann Rheum Dis 64 (2005) 1280-1287
Schirmer C., Scheel A.K., Althoff C.E., Schink T., Eshed I., Lembcke A., et al. Diagnostic quality and scoring of synovitis, tenosynovitis and erosions in low-field MRI of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional MRI. Ann Rheum Dis 66 (2007) 522-529
Bushberg J.T., Seibert A.J., Leidholdt E.M., and Boone J.M. Magnetic resonance imaging. In: Bushberg J.T., Seibert A.J., Leidholdt E.M., and Boone J.M. (Eds). The essential physics of medical imaging (2002), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA 415-465
von Engelhardt L., Schmitz A., Pennekamp P., Schild H., Wirtz D., and von Falkenhausen F. Diagnostics of degenerative meniscal tears at 3-Tesla MRI compared to arthroscopy as reference standard. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128 (2008) 451-456
Kastler B., Vetter D., and Patay Z. Artéfacts en imagerie par résonance magnétique. In: Kastler B., Vetter D., Patay Z., and Germain P. (Eds). Comprendre l'IRM, manuel d'auto-apprentissage (2003), Masson, Paris, France 207-232
Jack Jr. C.R., Berquist T.H., Miller G.M., Forbes G.S., Gray J.E., Morin R.L., et al. Field strength in neuro-MR imaging: a comparison of 0.5 T and 1.5 T. J Comput Assist Tomogr 14 (1990) 505-513
Vellet A.D., Lee D.H., Munk P.L., Hewett L., Eliasziw M., Dunlavy S., et al. Anterior cruciate ligament tear: prospective evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of middle- and high-field-strength MR imaging at 1.5 and 0.5 T. Radiology 197 (1995) 826-830
Parizel P.M., Dijkstra H.A., Geenen G.P., Kint P.A., Versteylen R.J., van Wiechen P.J., et al. Low-field versus high-field MR imaging of the knee: a comparison of signal behaviour and diagnostic performance. Eur J Radiol 19 (1995) 132-138
Kastler B. Imagerie rapide. In: Kastler B., Vetter D., Patay Z., and Germain P. (Eds). Comprendre l'IRM, manuel d'auto-apprentissage (2003), Masson, Paris, France 133-175
Railhac J. Sémiologie IRM de l'appareil locomoteur normal et pathologique. In: Railhac J., and Sans N. (Eds). IRM ostéo-articulaire et musculaire (2003), Masson, Paris, France 23-70
Arble J.B., Mattoon J.S., Drost W.T., Weisbrode S.E., Wassenaar P.A., Pan X., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the initial active stage of equine laminitis at 4.7T. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 50 (2009) 3-12
Jiang Y., Zhao J., White D.L., and Genant H.K. Micro CT and micro MR imaging of 3D architecture of animal skeleton. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 1 (2000) 45-51
Ludescher B., Martirosian P., Lenk S., Machann J., Dammann F., Schick F., et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone in the wrist at 3 tesla: initial results. Acta Radiol 46 (2005) 306-309
Genant H.K., and Jiang Y. Advanced imaging assessment of bone quality. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1068 (2006) 410-428
Werpy N., Ho P., Kawcak C.E., Rantanen N.W., and Mcllwraith C.W. Review of principles and clinical applications of magnetic resonance imaging in the horse. In: Proceedings Annual convention of AAEP. Practitioners AAEP (2006) 427-440 San Antonio, TX
Bydder M., Rahal A., Fullerton G.D., and Bydder G.M. The magic angle effect: a source of artifact, determinant of image contrast, and technique for imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 25 (2007) 290-300
Benjamin M., Milz S., and Bydder G.M. Magnetic resonance imaging of entheses. Part 1. Clin Radiol 63 (2008) 691-703
Smith M.R., Crowe O.C., Ellson C., Turner S.J., Patterson-Kane J.C., Schramme M.C., et al. Surgical treatment of osseous cyst-like lesions in the distal phalanx arising from collateral ligament insertional injury. Equine Vet Educ 17 (2005) 195-200
Kladny B., Gluckert K., Swoboda B., Beyer W., and Weseloh G. Comparison of low-field (0.2 Tesla) and high-field (1.5 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114 (1995) 281-286
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
