Download

Full Text

• Barker D, Meade A, Pagel M. 2007. Constrained models of evolution lead to improved prediction of functional linkage from correlated gain and loss of genes. Bioinformatics 23: 14-20.
• Barker D, Pagel M. 2005. Predicting functional gene links from phylogenetic-statistical analyses of whole genomes. PLoS Computational Biology 1: e3.
• Barkman JJ. 1958. Phytosociology and ecology of cryptogamic epiphytes. Assen: van Gorcum.
• Barrett SCH. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Review Genetics 3: 274-284.
• Bush SP, Beach JH. 1995. Breeding systems of epiphytes in a tropical montane wet forest. Selbyana 16: 155-158.
• Case AL, Graham SW, Macfarlane TD, Barrett CH. 2008. A phylogenetic study of evolutionary transitions in sexual systems in Australasian Wurmbea (Colchicaceae). International Journal of Plant Science 169: 141-156.
• Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 112: 975-997.
• Cheptou PO, Schoen DJ. 2007. Combining population genetics and demographical approaches in evolutionary studies of plant sexual systems. Oikos 116: 271-279.
• Chiou WL, Farrar DL, Ranker TA. 2002. The sexual systems of some epiphytic Polypodiaceae. American Fern Journal 92: 65-79.
• Crandall-Stotler BJ, Stotler RE, Long DG. 2009. Phylogeny and classification of the Marchantiophyta. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 66: 155-198.
• Crawford M, Jesson LK, Garnock-Jones PJ. 2009. Correlated evolution of sexual system and life history traits in mosses. Evolution 63: 1129-1142.
• Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. Preservation of plant samples for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis. Taxon 36: 715-722.
• Dubois S, Cheptou PO, Petit C, Meerts P, Poncelet M, Vekemans X, Lefebvre C, Escarre J. 2003. Genetic structure and sexual systems of metallicolous and nonmetallicolous populations of Thlaspi caerulescens. New Phytologist 157: 633-641.
• van Dulmen A. 2001. Pollination and phenology of flowers in the canopy of two contrasting rain forest types in Amazonia, Colombia. Plant Ecology 153: 73-85.
• During HJ. 1992. Ecological classifications of bryophytes and lichens. Bates JW, Farmer AM, eds. Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1-31.
• During HJ. 2007. Relations between clonal growth, reproduction and breeding system in the bryophytes of Belgium and The Netherlands. Nova Hedwigia Supplement 131: 133-145.
• Eppley SM, Taylor PJ, Jesson LK. 2007. Self-fertilization in mosses: a comparison of heterozygote deficiency between species with combined versus separate sexes. Heredity 98: 38-44.
• Forrest LL, Davis EC, Long DG, Crandall-Stotler BJ, Clark A, Hollingsworth ML. 2006. Unraveling the evolutionary history of the liverworts (Marchantiophyta): multiple taxa, genomes and analyses. The Bryologist 109: 303-334.
• Fritsch R. 1991. Index to bryophytes chromosome counts. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 40: 1-352.
• Gene Codes Corporation. 1998. Sequencher 4.01 reference, advanced, user friendly software tools for DNA sequencing. Madison, WI: Gene Codes Corporation.
• Gradstein SR, Churchill SP, Salazar AN. 2001. Guide to the bryophytes of tropical America. Memoirs of the New York Botanic Garden 86: 1-577.
• Hedderson TA, Longton RE. 1995. Patterns of life history variation in the Funariales, Polytrichales, and Pottiales. Journal of Bryology 18: 639-675.
• Hedderson TA, Longton RE. 2008. Local adaptation in moss life histories: population-level variation and a reciprocal transplant experiment. Journal of Bryology 30: 1-11.
• Heilbuth JC, Ilves KL, Otto SP. 2001. The consequences of dioecy for seed dispersal: modeling the seed-shadow handicap. Evolution 55: 880-888.
• Heinken T, Lees R, Raudnitschka D, Runge S. 2001. Epizoochorous dispersal of bryophyte stem fragments by roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa). Journal of Bryology 23: 293-300.
• Heinrichs J, Gradstein SR, Wilson R, Schneider H. 2005. Towards a natural classification of liverworts (Marchantiophyta) based on the chloroplast gene rbcL. Cryptogamie Bryolgie 26: 131-150.
• Hooper EA, Haufler CH. 1997. Genetic diversity and bredding system in a group of Neotropical epiphytic ferns (Pleopeltis; Polypodiaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 1664-1674.
• Huttunen S, Ignatov MS, Müller K, Quandt D. 2004. Phylogeny and evolution of epiphytism in the three moss families Meteoriaceae, Brachytheciaceae, and Lembophyllaceae. Monographs in Systematic Botany 98: 328-361.
• de Jong TJ. 2000. From pollen dynamics to adaptive dynamics. Plant Species Biology 15: 31-41.
• Karlin EF, Andrus RE, Boles SB, Shaw AJ. 2011. One haploid parent contributes 100% of the gene pool for a widespread species in northwest North America. Molecular Ecology 20: 753-767.
• Kimmerer RW. 1993. Disturbance and dominance in Tetraphis pellucida: a model of disturbance frequency and reproductive mode. The Bryologist 96: 73-79.
• Kozlowski J. 1992. Optimal allocation of resources to growth and reproduction: implications for age and size at maturity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 276-280.
• Krellwitz EC, Kowallik KV, Manos PS. 2001. Molecular and morphological analyses of Bryopsis (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta) from the western North Atlantic and Caribbean. Phycologia 40: 330-339.
• Leon-Vargas Y, Engwald S, Proctor MCF. 2006. Microclimate, light adaptation and desiccation tolerance of epiphytic bryophytes in two Venezuelan cloud forests. Journal of Biogeography 33: 901-913.
• Löbel S. 2009. Metapopulation and metacommunity processes, dispersal strategies and life-history trade-offs in epiphytes. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.
• Löbel S, Rydin H. 2010. Trade-offs and habitat constraints in the establishment of epiphytic bryophytes. Functional Ecology 24: 887-897.
• Löbel S, Snäll T, Rydin H. 2006a. Metapopulation processes in epiphytes inferred from patterns of regional distribution and local abundance in fragmented forest landscapes. Journal of Ecology 94: 856-868.
• Löbel S, Snäll T, Rydin H. 2006b. Species richness patterns and metapopulation processes - evidence from epiphyte communities in boreo-nemoral forests. Ecography 29: 169-182.
• Löbel S, Snäll T, Rydin H. 2009. Sexual system, reproduction mode and diaspore size affect metacommunity diversity. Journal of Ecology 97: 176-185.
• Longton RE. 1997. Reproductive biology and life-history strategies. Advances in Bryology 6: 65-101.
• Longton RE, Schuster RM. 1983. Reproductive biology. Schuster RM, ed. New manual of bryology. Nichinan: Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 386-462.
• Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 4.0. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
• McDaniel SF, von Stackelberg M, Richardt S, Quatrano RS, Reski R, Rensing SA. 2010. The speciation history of the Physcomitrium-Physcomitrella species complex. Evolution 64: 217-231.
• Miller JS, Venable DL. 2003. Floral morphometrics and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in Lycium (Solanaceae). Evolution 57: 74-86.
• Mishler BD, Newton AE. 1988. Influences of mature plants and desiccation on germination of spores and gametophytic fragments of Tortula. Journal of Bryology 15: 327-342.
• Mogie M. 1992. The evolution of sexual reproduction in plants. London: Chapman & Hall.
• Nadot S, Bajon R, Lejeune B. 1994. The choloroplast gene rps4 as a tool for the study of Poaceae phylogeny. Plant Systematics and Evolution 191: 27-38.
• Nylander JAA. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Uppsala, Sweden: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
• Pacak A, Szweykowska-Kulinska Z. 2000. Molecular data concerning alloploid character and the origin of chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes in the liverwort species Pellia borealis. Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2: 101-108.
• Pagel M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B 255: 37-45.
• Pagel M. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 48: 612-622.
• Pagel M, Lutzoni F. 2002. Accounting for phylogenetic uncertainty in comparative studies of evolution and adaptation. Lässig M, Valleriani A, eds. Biological evolution and statistical physics. BerlSpringer, 148-161.
• Pagel M, Meade A, Barker D. 2004. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 53: 673-684.
• Parsons G, Cairns A, Johnson CN, Robson SKA, Shilton LA, Westcott DA. 2007. Bryophyte dispersal by flying foxes: a novel discovery. Oecologia 152: 112-114.
• Pohjamo M, Laaka-Lindberg S. 2003. Reproductive modes in a leafy hepatic Anastrophyllum hellerianum. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 6: 159-168.
• Pohjamo M, Laaka-Lindberg S, Ovaskainen O, Korpelainen H. 2006. Dispersal potential of spores and asexual propagules in the epixylic hepatic Anastrophyllum hellerianum. Evolutionary Ecology 20: 415-430.
• Proctor MCF, Oliver MJ, Wood AJ, Alpert P, Stark LR, Cleavitt NL, Mishler BD. 2007. Desiccation-tolerance in bryophytes: a review. Bryologist 110: 595-621.
• Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2007. Tracer v1.4 [WWW document]. URL [accessed 27 May 2011].
• Renner SS, Beenken L, Grimm GW, Kocyan A, Rickelfs RE. 2007. The evolution of dioecy, heterodichogamy, and labile sex expression in Acer. Evolution 61: 2701-2719.
• Renner SS, Ricklefs RE. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 82: 596-606.
• Renner SS, Won H. 2001. Repeated evolution of dioecy from monoecy in Siparunaceae (Laurales). Systematic Biology 50: 700-712.
• Robert EC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792-1797.
• Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
• Ronse De Craene LP, Wanntorp L. 2006. Evolution of floral characters in Gunnera (Gunneraceae). Systematic Botany 31: 671-688.
• Rydgren K, Cronberg N, Økland RH. 2006. Factors influencing reproductive success in the clonal moss, Hylocomium splendens. Oecologia 147: 445-454.
• Rydgren K, Økland R. 2003. Short-term costs of sexual reproduction in the clonal moss Hylocomium splendens. Bryologist 106: 212-220.
• Sakai AK, Wagner DL, Ferguson DM, Herbst DR. 1995. Origins of dioecy in the Hawaiian flora. Ecology 76: 2517-2529.
• Schuster RM. 1966. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America east of the hundredth meridian. Volume 1. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Smith SD. 2010. Using phylogenetics to detect pollinator-mediated floral evolution. New Phytologist 188: 354-363.
• Snäll T, Ehrlen J, Rydin H. 2005. Colonization-extinction dynamics of an epiphyte metapopulation in a dynamic landscape. Ecology 86: 106-115.
• Snäll T, Fogelqvist J, Ribeiro PJ, Lascoux M. 2004a. Spatial genetic structure in two congeneric epiphytes with different dispersal strategies analysed by three different methods. Molecular Ecology 13: 2109-2119.
• Snäll T, Hagstrom A, Rudolphi J, Rydin H. 2004b. Distribution pattern of the epiphyte Neckera pennata on three spatial scales - importance of past landscape structure, connectivity and local conditions. Ecography 27: 757-766.
• Söderström L, Herben T. 1997. Dynamics of bryophyte metapopulations. Advances in Bryology 6: 205-240.
• Soulé M. 1971. The variation problem: the gene flow-variation hypothesis. Taxon 20: 37-50.
• Souza-Chies TT, Bittar G, Nadot S, Carter L, Besin E, Lejeune B. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of the Iridaceae with parsimony and distance methods using the plastid gene rps4. Plant Systematics and Evolution 204: 109-123.
• Stark LR, Brinda JC, McLetchie DN. 2009. An experimental demonstration of the cost of sex and a potential resource limitation on reproduction in the moss Pterygoneurum (Pottiaceae). American Journal of Botany 96: 1712-1721.
• Stearns SC. 1989. Trade-offs in life history evolution. Functional Ecology 3: 259-268.
• Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
• Taberlet P, Gielly L, Pautou G, Bouvet J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
• Taylor PJ, Eppley SM, Jesson LK. 2007. Sporophytic inbreeding depression in mosses occurs in a species with separate sexes but not in a species with combined sexes. American Journal of Botany 94: 1853-1859.
• Vanderpoorten A, Goffinet B. 2009. Introduction to bryophytes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Vanderpoorten A, Gradstein SR, Carine MA, Devos N. 2010. The ghosts of Gondwana and Laurasia in modern liverwort distributions. Biological Reviews 85: 471-487.
• Weller SG, Sakai AK. 1999. Using phylogenetic approaches for the analysis of plant breeding system evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 167-199.
• Wilson WG, Harder LD. 2003. Reproductive uncertainty and the relative competitiveness of simultaneous hermaphroditism versus dioecy. The American Naturalist 162: 220-241.
• Yamada K. 2003. Radulaceae. Gradstein SR, Costa DP, eds. The hepaticae and anthocerotae of Brazil. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 87: 1-318.
• Zheng M, Zhu RL. 2009. Karyological studies on some species of Radula (Radulaceae, Jungermanniopsida, Marchantiophyta). Nova Hedwigia 88: 229-244.