Central Africa; Large spatial scale; Communities; Tropical forest
Abstract :
[en] In this paper we seek to identify the floristic determination biases contained in large-scale commercial inventories conducted by logging companies and to determine whether this impacts on the observed patterns of alpha and beta diversity. The study focused on floristic data recently collected by industrial timber companies in the tropical forests of the Central African Republic (28,229 0.5-ha plots spread over 14,000km2). A subset of these plots (n = 1107) was later re-sampled for controlling purposes by experienced botanists. The proportion of agreement between the two samplings was assessed for each species and independently for small and large trees, and at genus and family resolutions. Unsurprisingly, large trees and common species were more accurately identified than small trees and rare species. We found that the quality of the floristic determination increased slightly from species to families. We also detected a significant variation between concessions in the quality of the floristic determination that was more dependent on working conditions during forest inventories than on field workers. Contrary to a widespread belief, we did not find a strong bias toward commercial species, showing that commercial inventory data could also be valid for non-commercial species in ecological studies. Finally, we found that both alpha and beta diversity patterns in commercial inventories were highly consistent with those of the re-sampled inventory. This latter result shows that commercial inventories are well suited to detect large-scale patterns of floristic variation. Large-scale commercial inventories could thus play an important role in the identification of large-scale patterns in tropical tree diversity. This could enhance our ability to manage tropical forests by designing representative reserve networks and developing management plans that integrate diversity patterns at the landscape scale.
APG II An update of the Angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the families of flowering plants. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2003, 14:399-436.
Aubréville, A., 1964. La forêt dense de la Lobaye. In: Cahier La Maboké, II, 1. Museum, Paris, pp. 5-9.
Balmford A., Lyon A.J.E., Lang R.M. Testing the higher-taxon approach to conservation planning in a megadiverse group: the macrofungi. Biol. Conserv. 2000, 93:209-217.
Best D.J., Roberts D.E. Algorithm AS 89: the upper tail probabilities of Spearman's rho. Appl. Stat. 1975, 24:377-379.
Billand A. Le projet d'appui à la réalisation des plans d'aménagement forestier (PARPAF) en RCA: un modèle de cogestion Etat-entreprises. Le Flamboyant 2005, 59/60:43-44.
Boulvert Y. Carte phytogéographique de la République centrafricaine (feuille OUEST - feuille EST) à 1: 1 000 000 1986.
Caballé G. Essai sur la géographie forestière du Gabon. Adansonia 1978, 17:425-440.
Casper B.B., Heard S.B., Apanius V. Ecological correlates of single-seededness in a woody tropical flora. Oecologia 1992, 90:212-217.
Chave J. Spatial variation in tree species composition across tropical forests: pattern and process. Tropical Forest Community Ecology 2008, Blackwell. W. Carson, S. Shnitzer (Eds.).
Comita L., Condit R., Hubbell S.P. Developmental changes in habitat associations of tropical trees. J. Ecol. 2007, 95:482-492.
Condit R., Pitman N., Leigh E.G., Chave J., Terborgh J., Foster R.B., Nunez P., Aguilar S., Valencia R., Villa G., Muller-Landau H.C., Losos E., Hubbell S.P. Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 2002, 295:666-669.
Couteron P., Pelissier R., Mapaga D., Molino J.F., Teillier L. Drawing ecological insights from a management-oriented forest inventory in French Guiana. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2003, 172:89-108.
de Wasseige C., Devers D., de Marcken P., Eba'a Atyi R., Nasi R., Mayaux P. Les forêts du bassin du Congo - Etat des forêts 2008 2009, Office des publications officielles des Communautés européennes.
Durrieu de Madron L., Fontez B., Dipapounji B. Dégâts d'exploitation et de débardage en fonction de l'intensité d'exploitation en forêt dense humide d'Afrique Centrale. Bois For. Trop. 2000, 264:57-60.
Ellis D. Taxonomic sufficiency in pollution assessment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1985, 16:459-1459.
Fang J.Y., Chen A.P., Peng C.H., Zhao S.Q., Ci L. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science 2001, 292:2320-2322.
Fearnside P.M. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecol. Manag. 1997, 90:59-87.
Feldpausch T.R., McDonald A.J., Passos C.A.M., Lehmann J., Riha S.J. Biomass, harvestable area, and forest structure estimated from commercial timber inventories and remotely sensed imagery in southern Amazonia. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2006, 233:121-132.
Gaston K.J., Williams P.H. Mapping the world's species - the higher taxon approach. Biodivers. Lett. 1993, 1:2-8.
Gonzalez M.A., Roger A., Courtois E.A., Jabot F., Norden N., Paine C.E.T., Baraloto C., Thebaud C., Chave J. Shifts in species and phylogenetic diversity between sapling and tree communities indicate negative density dependence in a lowland rain forest. J. Ecol. 2010, 98:137-146.
Hardy O.J., Sonke B. Spatial pattern analysis of tree species distribution in a tropical rain forest of Cameroon: assessing the role of limited dispersal and niche differentiation. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2004, 197:191-202.
Higgins M.A., Ruokolainen K. Rapid tropical forest inventory: a comparison of techniques based on inventory data from western Amazonia. Conserv. Biol. 2004, 18:799-811.
Horn H.S. Measurement of " overlap" in comparative ecological studies. Am. Nat. 1966, 100:419-424.
Jaccard P. Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura. Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 1901, 37:547-579.
Jost L. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 2006, 113:363-375.
Jost L. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 2007, 88:2427-2439.
Karsenty A., Gourlet-Fleury S. Assessing sustainability of logging practices in the Congo Basin's managed forests: the issue of commercial species recovery. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(1):26. URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art26/ (online 20.07.10).
Kenfack D., Duncan W.T., Chuyong G., Condit R. Rarity and abundance in a diverse African forest. Biodivers. Conserv. 2007, 16:2045-2074.
Keppel G., Buckley Y.M., Possingham H.P. Drivers of lowland rain forest community assembly, species diversity and forest structure on islands in the tropical South Pacific. J. Ecol. 2010, 98:87-95.
Kroonenberg P.M., Lombardo R. Nonsymmetric correspondence analysis: a tool for analysing contingency tables with a dependence structure. Multivar. Behav. Res. 1999, 34:367-396.
La Torre-Cuadros M., Herrando-Perez S., Young K.R. Diversity and structural patterns for tropical montane and premontane forests of central Peru, with an assessment of the use of higher-taxon surrogacy. Biodivers. Conserv. 2007, 16:2965-2988.
Lacerda A.E.B., Nimmo E.R. Can we really manage tropical forests without knowing the species within? Getting back to the basics of forest management through taxonomy. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259:995-1002.
Laliberte E. Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Comment. Ecology 2008, 89:3232-3237.
Legendre P., Borcard D., Peres-Neto P.R. Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol. Monogr. 2005, 75:435-450.
Legendre P., Borcard D., Peres-Neto P.R. Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Comment. Ecology 2008, 89:3238-3244.
Mandelik Y., Dayan T., Chikatunov V., Kravchenko V. Reliability of a higher-taxon approach to richness, rarity, and composition assessments at the local scale. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21:1506-1515.
Mangala, P.-M., 1999. Evaluation des ressources forestières ligneuses dans la République Centrafricaine. Programme de partenariat CE-FAO (1998-2002). URL: (online 20/07/2010). http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/x6805f/X6805F00.htm.
Morisita M. Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyoto University, Ser. E (Biol.) 1959, 3:65-80.
Moritz C., Richardson K.S., Ferrier S., Monteith G.B., Stanisic J., Williams S.E., Whiffin T. Biogeographical concordance and efficiency of taxon indicators for establishing conservation priority in a tropical rainforest biota. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. Ser. B 2001, 268:1875-1881.
Nicolas P. Contribution à l'étude phytogéographique de la forêt du Gabon. Laboratoire de sociologie et de géographie africaines 1977, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Siences Sociales, Paris, 315.
Parmentier I., Malhi Y., Senterre B., Whittaker R.J., Alonso A.T.D.N., Balinga A., Bakayoko M.P.B., Bongers A., Chatelain F., Comiskey C., Cortay J.A., Kamdem R., Doucet M.N.D., Gautier J.L., Hawthorne L., Issembe W.D., Kouame Y.A., Kouka F.N., Leal L.A., Lejoly M.E., Lewis J., Nusbaumer S.L., Parren L., Peh M.P.E., Phillips K.S.H., Sheil O.L., Sonke D., Sosef B., Sunderland M.S.M., Stropp T.C.H., ter Steege J., Swaine H., Tchouto M.D., van Gemerden M.G.P., van Valkenburg B.S., Woll J.H. The odd man out? Might climate explain the lower tree alpha-diversity of African rain forests relative to Amazonian rain forests?. J. Ecol. 2007, 95:1058-1071.
Pélissier R., Couteron P., Dray S., Sabatier D. Consistency between ordination techniques and diversity measurements: two strategies for species occurrence data. Ecology 2003, 84:242-251.
Pélissier R., Couteron P., Dray S. Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Comment. Ecology 2008, 89:3227-3232.
Phillips O.L., Aragao L., Lewis S.L., Fisher J.B., Lloyd J., Lopez-Gonzalez G., Malhi Y., Monteagudo A., Peacock J., Quesada C.A., van der Heijden G., Almeida S., Amaral I., Arroyo L., Aymard G., Baker T.R., Banki O., Blanc L., Bonal D., Brando P., Chave J., de Oliveira A.C.A., Cardozo N.D., Czimczik C.I., Feldpausch T.R., Freitas M.A., Gloor E., Higuchi N., Jimenez E., Lloyd G., Meir P., Mendoza C., Morel A., Neill D.A., Nepstad D., Patino S., Penuela M.C., Prieto A., Ramirez F., Schwarz M., Silva J., Silveira M., Thomas A.S., ter Steege H., Stropp J., Vasquez R., Zelazowski P., Davila E.A., Andelman S., Andrade A., Chao K.J., Erwin T., Di Fiore A., Honorio E., Keeling H., Killeen T.J., Laurance W.F., Cruz A.P., Pitman N.C.A., Vargas P.N., Ramirez-Angulo H., Rudas A., Salamao R., Silva N., Terborgh J., Torres-Lezama A. Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest. Science 2009, 323:1344-1347.
Poorter L., Hawthorne W., Bongers F., Sheil D. Maximum size distributions in tropical forest communities: relationships with rainfall and disturbance. J. Ecol. 2008, 96:495-504.
R Development Core Team, 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In: R Foundation for Statistical Computing (Ed.), Vienna, Austria.
Réjou-Méchain M., Pélissier R., Gourlet-Fleury S., Couteron P., Nasi R., Thompson J.D. Regional variation in tropical forest tree species composition in the Central African Republic: an assessment based on inventories by forest companies. J. Trop. Ecol. 2008, 24:663-674.
Richards P.W. Africa the 'odd man out'. Tropical Forest Ecosystems of Africa and South America: A Comparative Review 1973, 21-26. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington. B.J. Meggers, E.S. Ayensu, W.D. Duckworth (Eds.).
Ruiz Pérez M., Ezzine de Blas D.E., Nasi R., Sayer J.A., Sassen M., Angoue C., Gami N., Ndoye O., Ngono G., Nguinguiri J.C., Nzala D., Toirambe B., Yalibanda Y. Logging in the Congo Basin: a multi-country characterization of timber companies. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2005, 214:221-236.
Ruokolainen K., Linna A., Tuomisto H. Use of Melastomataceae and pteridophytes for revealing phytogeographical patterns in Amazonian rain forests. J. Trop. Ecol. 1997, 13:243-256.
Russo S.E., Davies S.J., King D.A., Tan S. Soil-related performance variation and distributions of tree species in a Bornean rain forest. J. Ecol. 2005, 93:879-889.
Schulze M., Grogan J., Landis R.M., Vidal E. How rare is too rare to harvest? Management challenges posed by timber species occurring at low densities in the Brazilian Amazon. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256:1443-1457.
ter Steege H. The use of forest inventory for a National Protected Area Strategy in Guyana. Biodivers. Conserv. 1998, 7:1457-1483.
ter Steege H., Hammond D.S. Character convergence, diversity, and disturbance in tropical rain forest in Guyana. Ecology 2001, 82:3197-3212.
ter Steege H., Pitman N.C.A., Phillips O.L., Chave J., Sabatier D., Duque A., Molino J.F., Prevost M.F., Spichiger R., Castellanos H., von Hildebrand P., Vasquez R. Continental-scale patterns of canopy tree composition and function across Amazonia. Nature 2006, 443:444-447.
Tuomisto H., Ruokolainen K., Yli-Halla M. Dispersal, environment, and floristic variation of western Amazonian forests. Science 2003, 299:241-244.
Tuomisto H., Ruokolainen K. Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Understanding the targets of different methods of analysis. Ecology 2006, 87:2697-2708.
Tuomisto H., Ruokolainen K. Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Reply. Ecology 2008, 89:3244-3256.
Van Vliet N., Nasi R. Mise en évidence des facteurs du paysage qui influent sur la répartition de la faune au sein d'une concession forestière. Bois For. Trop. 2007, 292:23-36.
Van Vliet N., Nasi R. Mammal distribution in a Central African logging concession area. Biodivers. Conserv. 2008, 17:1241-1249.
White, F., 1983. The Vegetation of Africa. A Descriptive Memoir to Accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO Vegetation Map of Africa. UNESCO, Paris.