Article (Scientific journals)
Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.
Di Leo, Angelo; Jerusalem, Guy; Petruzelka, Lubos et al.
2010In Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28 (30), p. 4594-600
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
CONFIRM online[1].pdf
Publisher postprint (203.93 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] PURPOSE: We compared fulvestrant 500 mg regimen with the approved dose of fulvestrant 250 mg per month for treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer who experienced progression after prior endocrine therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Comparison of Faslodex in Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer (CONFIRM) is a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, phase III study. Patients were randomly assigned to fulvestrant 500 mg (500 mg intramuscularly [IM] on day 0, then 500 mg IM on days 14 and 28 and every 28 days thereafter) or 250 mg every 28 days. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate, clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of clinical benefit (DoCB), overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: PFS was significantly longer for fulvestrant 500 mg (n = 362) than 250 mg (n = 374) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.94; P = .006), corresponding to a 20% reduction in risk of progression. Objective response rate was similar for fulvestrant 500 mg and 250 mg (9.1% v 10.2%, respectively). CBR was 45.6% for fulvestrant 500 mg and 39.6% for fulvestrant 250 mg. DoCB and OS were 16.6 and 25.1 months, respectively, for the 500-mg group, whereas DoCB and OS were 13.9 and 22.8 months, respectively, in the 250-mg group. Fulvestrant 500 mg was well tolerated with no dose-dependent adverse events. QOL was similar for both arms. CONCLUSION: Fulvestrant 500 mg was associated with a statistically significant increase in PFS and not associated with increased toxicity, corresponding to a clinically meaningful improvement in benefit versus risk compared with fulvestrant 250 mg.
Disciplines :
Oncology
Author, co-author :
Di Leo, Angelo
Jerusalem, Guy  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Oncologie médicale
Petruzelka, Lubos
Torres, Roberto
Bondarenko, Igor N
Khasanov, Rustem
Verhoeven, Didier
Pedrini, Jose L
Smirnova, Iya
Lichinitser, Mikhail R
Pendergrass, Kelly
Garnett, Sally
Lindemann, Justin P O
Sapunar, Francisco
Martin, Miguel
More authors (5 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.
Publication date :
2010
Journal title :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
ISSN :
0732-183X
eISSN :
1527-7755
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, United States - Virginia
Volume :
28
Issue :
30
Pages :
4594-600
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 11 November 2010

Statistics


Number of views
123 (10 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
3 (3 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
529
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
502
OpenCitations
 
447

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi