Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.
Di Leo, Angelo; Jerusalem, Guy; Petruzelka, Luboset al.
2010 • In Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28 (30), p. 4594-600
[en] PURPOSE: We compared fulvestrant 500 mg regimen with the approved dose of fulvestrant 250 mg per month for treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer who experienced progression after prior endocrine therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Comparison of Faslodex in Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer (CONFIRM) is a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, phase III study. Patients were randomly assigned to fulvestrant 500 mg (500 mg intramuscularly [IM] on day 0, then 500 mg IM on days 14 and 28 and every 28 days thereafter) or 250 mg every 28 days. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate, clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of clinical benefit (DoCB), overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: PFS was significantly longer for fulvestrant 500 mg (n = 362) than 250 mg (n = 374) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.94; P = .006), corresponding to a 20% reduction in risk of progression. Objective response rate was similar for fulvestrant 500 mg and 250 mg (9.1% v 10.2%, respectively). CBR was 45.6% for fulvestrant 500 mg and 39.6% for fulvestrant 250 mg. DoCB and OS were 16.6 and 25.1 months, respectively, for the 500-mg group, whereas DoCB and OS were 13.9 and 22.8 months, respectively, in the 250-mg group. Fulvestrant 500 mg was well tolerated with no dose-dependent adverse events. QOL was similar for both arms. CONCLUSION: Fulvestrant 500 mg was associated with a statistically significant increase in PFS and not associated with increased toxicity, corresponding to a clinically meaningful improvement in benefit versus risk compared with fulvestrant 250 mg.
Disciplines :
Oncology
Author, co-author :
Di Leo, Angelo
Jerusalem, Guy ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Oncologie médicale
Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.
Publication date :
2010
Journal title :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
ISSN :
0732-183X
eISSN :
1527-7755
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, United States - Virginia
Wakeling AE, Dukes M, Bowler J: A potent specific pure antiestrogen with clinical potential. Cancer Res 51:3867-3873, 1991
Howell A, Osborne CK, Morris C, et al: ICI 182,780 (Faslodex): Development of a novel, "pure" antiestrogen. Cancer 89:817-825, 2000
Robertson JF, Nicholson RI, Bundred NJ, et al: Comparison of the short-term biological effects of 7alpha-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulfinyl) - nonyl] estra-1,3,5, (10)-triene-3, 17beta-diol (Faslodex) versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. Cancer Res 61:6739-6746, 2001
Howell A, Robertson JF, Quaresma Albano J, et al: Fulvestrant, formerly ICI 182,780, is as effective as anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endocrine treatment. J Clin Oncol 20: 3396-3403, 2002
Osborne CK, Pippen J, Jones SE, et al: Double-blind, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior endocrine therapy: Results of a North American trial. J Clin Oncol 20:3386-3395, 2002
DeFriend DJ, Howell A, Nicholson RI, et al: Investigation of a new pure antiestrogen (1Cl 182780) in women with primary breast cancer. Cancer Res 54:408-414, 1994 (Pubitemid 24053178)
Robertson JF, Osborne CK, Howell A, et al: Fulvestrant versus anastrozole for the treatment of advanced breast carcinoma in postmenopausal women: A prospective combined analysis of two multicenter trials. Cancer 98:229-238, 2003 (Pubitemid 36828445)
Kuter I, Hegg R, Singer CF, et al: Fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg: First results from NEWEST, a randomized, phase II neoadjuvant trial in postmenopausal women with locally advanced, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 109:589, 2008 (abstr)
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al: New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205-216, 2000 (Pubitemid 30099779)
National Cancer Institute: Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0. http://ctep.cancer .gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic-applications/ctc.htm
Konecny G, Pauletti G, Pegram M, et al: Quantitative association between HER-2/neu and steroid hormone receptors in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:142-153, 2003 (Pubitemid 36193263)
Jordan VC: The 38th David A. Karnofsky lecture: The paradoxical actions of estrogen in breast cancer - Survival or death? J Clin Oncol 26:3073-3082, 2008
Osipo C, Gajdos C, Liu H, et al: Paradoxical action of fulvestrant in estradiol-induced regression of tamoxifen-stimulated breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1597-1608, 2003 (Pubitemid 37455927)
Peethambaram PP, Ingle JN, Suman VJ, et al: Randomized trial of diethylstilbestrol vs. tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer: An updated analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 54:117-122, 1999 (Pubitemid 29295314)
Lønning PE, Taylor PD, Anker G, et al: High-dose estrogen treatment in postmenopausal breast cancer patients heavily exposed to endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 67:111-116, 2001 (Pubitemid 32744491)
Ellis MJ, Dehdahti F, Kommareddy A, et al: A randomized phase II trial of low dose (6 mg daily) versus high dose (30 mg daily) estradiol for patients with estrogen receptor positive aromatase inhibitor resistant advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res 69:68s, 2009 (suppl; abstr 16)