Abstract :
[en] This study aimed at comparing the sensitivity and hot and cold contrasts obtained when imaging the Picker thyroid phantom using gamma cameras fitted with either their ultra-high or high-resolution low energy parallel hole collimator.
Seventeen camera models from Elscint, General Electric, Siemens and Sopha Medical Vision were involved in the study for a total of 30 cameras and 52 camera heads. A single operator conducted the study in order to minimize the impact of human factors. The phantom contained about 74 MBq 99mTc and was imaged at 10-cm from the collimator face with the energy window recommended by the camera manufacturer. A total of 1 million counts were accumulated.
Hot and cold contrasts were in mean about 0.05 higher when using an ultra-high-resolution than when using a high-resolution low energy collimator. This higher contrast was obtained at the expense of a mean reduction in sensitivity of 30%. In particular, Elscint cameras demonstrated a 30% lower sensitivity whatever the collimator type. The Sopha Medical Vision DST and DSX cameras and the General Electric Magicam camera offered the lowest contrasts among the cameras with a high-resolution collimator. Although this was accompanied by a higher than the mean sensitivity for the DST and DSX, the Magicam demonstrated sensitivity roughly identical to the mean of all the cameras with a high-resolution collimator.
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
4