[en] This paper is part of a study investigating the prediction of the aeroelastic behaviour of aircraft subjected to non-linear aerodynamic forces. The main objective of the work is the characterization of the dynamic response of aeroelastic models resulting from coupled Computational Fluid Dynamic and Finite Element calculations. Of interest here is the identification of the flight condition at which the response bifurcates to limited or divergent amplitude self-sustained oscillations without carrying out a comprehensive set of full, computationally expensive, time-marching calculations. The model treated in this work is a three-dimensional wing in a transonic flowfield. Short datasets of pre-bifurcation behaviour are analysed to determine the system’s stability and degree of non-linearity. It is found that the calculated responses on the run-up to a transonic Limit Cycle Oscillation show little or no evidence of non-linearity. The non-linearity appears abruptly at the bifurcation flight condition. The variation of the local Mach number over the wing’s surface in the steady-state case is used to demonstrate that the non-linearity is due to a shock wave that can move along the surface. At Mach numbers where this is not possible the system behaves in a linear manner and its stability can be analysed using linear methods.
Disciplines :
Aerospace & aeronautics engineering
Author, co-author :
Vio, Gareth Arthur; University of Manchester > School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering
Dimitriadis, Grigorios ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > Intéractions fluide structure et aérodynamique expérimentale
Cooper, Jonathan E.; University of Manchester > School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering
Badcock, Ken J.; University of Liverpool > Department of Engineering
Woodgate, Mark A.; University of Liverpool > Department of Engineering
Rampurawala, Abdul M.; University of Liverpool > Department of Engineering
Language :
English
Title :
Aeroelastic system identification using transonic CFD data for a wing/store configuration
Badcock K.J., Richards B.E., and Woodgate M.A. Elements of computational fluid dynamics on block structured grids using implicit solvers. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 36 (2000) 351-392
Beran P.S., Khot N.S., Eastep F.E., Snyder R.D., and Zweber J.V. Numerical analysis of store-induced limit-cycle oscillation. Journal of Aircraft 41 6 (2004) 1315-1326
S.R. Bland, J.W. Edwards, Airfoil shape and thickness effects on transonic airloads and flutter, Technical Report TM-84632, NASA, 1983
P. Chen, E. Sulaeman, D. Liu, C. Denegri, Influence of external store aerodynamics on flutter/lco of a fighter aircraft, in: Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Denver, Colorado, April 2002
Conner M.D., Tang D.M., Dowell E.H., and Virgin L.N. Nonlinear behavior of a typical airfoil section with control surface freeplay: a numerical and experimental study. Journal of Fluids and Structures 11 (1997) 89-109
Denegri C.M. Limit cycle oscillation flight test results of a fighter with external stores. Journal of Aircraft 37 5 (2000) 761-769
Dimitriadis G., and Cooper J.E. A time frequency technique for the stability analysis impulse response from non-linear aeroelastic systems. Journal of Fluids and Structures 17 8 (2003) 1181-1201
G. Dimitriadis, G.A. Vio, J.E. Cooper, Stability and LCO amplitude prediction for aeroelastic systems with structural and aerodynamic nonlinearities using numerical continuation, in: AVT Symposium on Flow-Induced Unsteady Loads and the Impact on Military Applications, Budapest, Hungary, May 2005
Ding Q., Cooper J.E., and Leung A.Y.T. Application of an improved cell mapping method to bilinear stiffness aeroelastic systems. Journal of Fluids and Structures 20 1 (2005) 35-49
In: Dowell E.H. (Ed). A Modern Course in Aeroelasticity. fourth ed. (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers
Dowell E.H., Edwards J.W., and Strganac T.W. Nonlinear aeroelasticity. Journal of Aircraft 40 5 (2003) 857-874
S.A. Dunn, P.A. Farrell, P.J. Budd, P.B. Arms, C.A. Hardie, C.J. Rendo, F/A-18A flight flutter testing-limit cycle oscillation or flutter? in: International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Madrid, Spain, June 2001
Gaitonde A.L., and Jones D.P. Reduced order state-space models from the pulse responses of a linearized CFD scheme. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 42 6 (2004) 581-606
Goland M. The flutter of a uniform cantilever wing. Journal of Applied Mechanics 12 4 (1945) 197-208
Gordon W.J., and Hall C.A. Construction of curvilinear coordinate systems and applications to mesh generation. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering 7 (1973) 461-477
G.S.L. Goura, Time marching analysis of flutter using computational fluid dynamics, PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, 2001
A. Jameson, Time dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings, Technical Report 91-1596, AIAA, 1991
Lee B.H.K., Price S.J., and Wong Y.S. Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of airfoils: bifurcation and chaos. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 35 (1999) 205-334
Van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme II: monotonicity and conservation combined in a second order scheme. Journal of Computational Physics 14 4 (1974) 361-374
P. Lisandrin, G. Carpentieri, M. van Tooren, Open issues in system identification of CFD based aerodynamic models for aeroelastic applications, in: International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Munich, Germany, June 2005
Liu D.D., Kao Y.F., and Fung K.Y. An efficient method for computing unsteady transonic aerodynamics of swept wings with control surfaces. Journal of Aircraft 25 1 (1988) 25-31
Liu L., and Dowell E.H. Harmonic balance approach for an airfoil with a freeplay control surface. AIAA Journal 43 4 (2005) 802-815
Liu L., Wong Y.S., and Lee B.H.K. Application of the centre manifold theory in non-linear aeroelasticity. Journal of Sound and Vibration 234 4 (1999) 641-659
E. Nissim, G. B. Gilyard, Method for experimental identification of flutter speed by parameter identification, Report AIAA-89-1324, 1989
Osher S., and Chakravarthy S. Upwind schemes and boundary conditions with applications to Euler equations in general geometries. Journal of Computational Physics 50 (1983) 447-481
Price S.J., Alighambari H., and Lee B.H.K. The aeroelastic response of a two-dimensional airfoil with bilinear and cubic structural nonlinearities. Journal of Fluids and Structures 9 (1995) 175-193
Roberts I., Jones D.P., Lieven N.A.J., Di Bernado M., and Champneys A.R. Analysis of piecewise linear aeroelastic systems using numerical continuation. Proceedings of the I MECH E Part G. Journal of Aerospace Engineering 216 1 (2002) 1-11
Silva R.G.A., Mello O.A.F., and Azevedo J.L.F. Navier stokes-based study into linearity in transonic flow for flutter analysis. Journal of Aircraft 40 5 (2003) 997-1000
W.A. Silva, T.W. Strganac, M.R. Hajj, Higher-order spectral analysis of a nonlinear pitch and plunge apparatus, in: Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Austin, Texas, USA, April 2005
Strogatz S.H. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos (1984), Perseus Books
Vio G.A., and Cooper J.E. Limit cycle oscillation prediction for aeroelastic systems with discrete bilinear stiffness. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 3 (2005) 100-119