[en] BACKGROUND: Poor response is a major concern in public health surveys. In a population-based ORISCAV-LUX study carried out in Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to assess the cardiovascular risk factors, the non-response rate was not negligible. The aims of the present work were: 1) to investigate the representativeness of study sample to the general population, and 2) to compare the known demographic and cardiovascular health-related profiles of participants and non-participants. METHODS: For sample representativeness, the participants were compared to the source population according to stratification criteria (age, sex and district of residence). Based on complementary information from the "medical administrative database", further analysis was carried out to assess whether the health status affected the response rate. Several demographic and morbidity indicators were used in the univariate comparison between participants and non-participants. RESULTS: Among the 4452 potentially eligible subjects contacted for the study, there were finally 1432 (32.2%) participants. Compared to the source population, no differences were found for gender and district distribution. By contrast, the youngest age group was under-represented while adults and elderly were over-represented in the sample, for both genders. Globally, the investigated clinical profile of the non-participants was similar to that of participants. Hospital admission and cardiovascular health-related medical measures were comparable in both groups even after controlling for age. The participation rate was lower in Portuguese residents as compared to Luxembourgish (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.48-0.69). It was also significantly associated with the professional status (P < 0.0001). Subjects from the working class were less receptive to the study than those from other professional categories. CONCLUSION: The 32.2% participation rate obtained in the ORISCAV-LUX survey represents the realistic achievable rate for this type of multiple-stage, nationwide, population-based surveys. It corresponds to the expected rate upon which the sample size was calculated. Given the absence of discriminating health profiles between participants and non-participants, it can be concluded that the response rate does not invalidate the results and allows generalizing the findings for the population.
Disciplines :
General & internal medicine
Author, co-author :
Alkerwi, Ala'a
Sauvageot, Nicolas
Couffignal, Sophie
Albert, Adelin ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Informatique médicale et biostatistique
Lair, Marie-Lise
Guillaume, Michèle ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Informatique médicale et biostatistique
Language :
English
Title :
Comparison of participants and non-participants to the ORISCAV-LUX population-based study on cardiovascular risk factors in Luxembourg.
Non-response bias in a study of cardiovascular diseases, functional status and self-rated health among elderly men. N Hoeymans EJ Feskens GA Van Den Bos D Kromhout, Age and ageing 1998 27 1 35 40 10.1093/ageing/27.1.35 9504364
Differences between respondents and nonrespondents in a multicenter community-based study vary by gender ethnicity. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. R Jackson LE Chambless K Yang T Byrne R Watson A Folsom E Shahar W Kalsbeek, Journal of clinical epidemiology 1996 49 12 1441 1446 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00047-X 8970495
Effect on trend estimates of the difference between survey respondents and non-respondents: results from 27 populations in the WHO MONICA Project. H Tolonen A Dobson S Kulathinal, European journal of epidemiology 2005 20 11 887 898 10.1007/s10654-005-2672-5 16284866
Non-response in a survey of cardiovascular risk factors in the Dutch population: determinants and resulting biases. HC Boshuizen AL Viet HS Picavet A Botterweck AJ van Loon, Public health 2006 120 4 297 308 10.1016/j.puhe.2005. 09.008 16364384
Investigating non-response bias in mail surveys. K Sheikh S Mattingly, Journal of epidemiology and community health 1981 35 4 293 296 10.1136/jech.35.4.293 6461711
Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in houshold surveys. RM Groves, Public Opinion Quarterly 2006 70 No.5, Special 646 675 10.1093/poq/nfl033
Characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in a community cardiovascular disease risk factor screening: the Minnesota Heart Health Program. PL Pirie WS Elias DB Wackman DR Jacobs DM Murray MB Mittelmark RV Luepker H Blackburn, American journal of preventive medicine 1986 2 1 20 25 3453156
Demographic characteristics and health behaviours of consenters to medical examination. Results from the Welsh Heart Health Survey. E Pullen D Nutbeam L Moore, Journal of epidemiology and community health 1992 46 4 455 459 10.1136/jech.46.4.455 1431726
Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: the views of a cohort of non-attenders. R Pill N Stott, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 1988 38 307 57 60 3204566
How many mailouts? Could attempts to increase the response rate in the Iraq war cohort study be counterproductive? AR Tate M Jones L Hull NT Fear R Rona S Wessely M Hotopf, BMC medical research methodology 2007 7 51 10.1186/1471-2288-7-51 18045472
Nonresponse in sample surveys: the problem and some solutions. DR Brogan, Physical therapy 1980 60 8 1026 1032 7403278
Non-response bias in a lifestyle survey. A Hill J Roberts P Ewings D Gunnell, Journal of public health medicine 1997 19 2 203 207 9243437
Experiments in producing nonresponse bias. RM Groves MP Couper PSSETRPA G L Nelson, Public Opinion Quarterly 2006 70 5, special 720 736 10.1093/poq/nfl036
Estimating non-response bias in a survey on alcohol consumption: comparison of response waves. VM Lahaut HA Jansen D van de Mheen HF Garretsen JE Verdurmen A van Dijk, Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford, Oxfordshire) 2003 38 2 128 134 10.1093/alcalc/agg044 12634259
The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment. R Curtin S Presser E Singer, Public Opin Q 2000 64 4 413 428 10.1086/318638 11171024
Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. S Keeter C Miller A Kohut RM Groves S Presser, Public Opin Q 2000 64 2 125 148 10.1086/317759 10984330
Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: a survey of practice. LM Morton J Cahill P Hartge, Am J Epidemiol 2006 163 3 197 203 10.1093/aje/kwj036 16339049
Response and nonresponse bias in oral health surveys. D Locker, Journal of public health dentistry 2000 60 2 72 81 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2000.tb03298.x 10929564
Survey response rates: national and regional differences in a European multicentre study of vertebral osteoporosis. TW O'Neill D Marsden C Matthis H Raspe AJ Silman, Journal of epidemiology and community health 1995 49 1 87 93 10.1136/jech.49.1.87 7707013
Baseline characteristics are not sufficient indicators of non-response bias follow up studies. J Vestbo FV Rasmussen, Journal of epidemiology and community health 1992 46 6 617 619 10.1136/jech.46.6.617 1494079
Differences in the characteristics of responders and non-responders in a prevalence survey of vertebral osteoporosis. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group. TW O'Neill D Marsden AJ Silman, Osteoporos Int 1995 5 5 327 334 10.1007/BF01622254 8800782
Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. P Edwards I Roberts M Clarke C DiGuiseppi S Pratap R Wentz I Kwan, BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2002 324 7347 1183. 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183 12016181
Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey. K Korkeila S Suominen J Ahvenainen A Ojanlatva P Rautava H Helenius M Koskenvuo, European journal of epidemiology 2001 17 11 991 999 10.1023/A:1020016922473 12380710
Studies with low response proportions may be less biased than studies with high response proportions. A Stang KH Jockel, American journal of epidemiology 2004 159 2 204 210 10.1093/aje/kwh009 14718223
First nationwide survey on cardiovascular risk factors in Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (ORISCAV-LUX). A Alkerwi N Sauvageot A-F Donneau M-L Lair S Couffignal J Beissel C Delagardelle Y Wagener A Albert M Guillaume, BMC Public Health 2010 10 468 20698957
Sample Size Determination in Health Studies: A Practical Manual. SK Lwanga S Lemeshow, 1991
The Study of Health Assessment and Risk in Ethnic groups (SHARE): rationale and design. The SHARE Investigators. SS Anand S Yusuf V Vuksan S Devanesen P Montague L Kelemen J Bosch C Sigouin KK Teo E Lonn, et al. Can J Cardiol 1998 14 11 1349 1357 9854515
Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. P Edwards I Roberts M Clarke C DiGuiseppi S Pratap R Wentz I Kwan R Cooper, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 2 R000008 17443629
Precision and validity in epidemiological studies. KJGS Rothman, Modern Epidemiology 2 1998 115 134
Characteristics of non-response in the Danish Health Interview Surveys, 1987-1994. M Kjoller H Thoning, Eur J Public Health 2005 15 5 528 535 10.1093/eurpub/cki023 16051660
Nonresponse bias in EC Respiratory Health Survey in Italy. R de Marco G Verlato E Zanolin M Bugiani JW Drane, Eur Respir J 1994 7 12 2139 2145 10.1183/09031936.94.07122139 7713194
Participation bias in a population-based echocardiography study. SJ Jacobsen DW Mahoney MM Redfield KR Bailey JC Burnett RJ Rodeheffer, Ann Epidemiol 2004 14 8 579 584 10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.11.001 15350958
Investigating the effect of nonparticipation using a population-based case-control study on myocardial infarction. E Ramos C Lopes H Barros, Ann Epidemiol 2004 14 6 437 441 10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.09.013 15246333
Response bias in the Honolulu Heart Program. R Benfante D Reed C MacLean A Kagan, American journal of epidemiology 1989 130 6 1088 1100 2589302
Selection bias in a population survey with registry linkage: potential effect on socioeconomic gradient in cardiovascular risk. E Strandhagen C Berg L Lissner L Nunez A Rosengren K Toren DS Thelle, Eur J Epidemiol 2010 25 3 163 172 10.1007/s10654-010-9427-7 20127393
Participation bias assessment in a community-based study of myocardial infarction, 2002-2005. Y Gerber SJ Jacobsen JM Killian SA Weston VL Roger, Mayo Clin Proc 2007 82 8 933 938 10.4065/82.8.933 17673061
The Oslo Health Study: The impact of self-selection in a large, population-based survey. AJ Sogaard R Selmer E Bjertness D Thelle, Int J Equity Health 2004 3 1 3 10.1186/1475-9276-3-3 15128460
Differences between respondents and non-respondents in a population-based cardiovascular disease study. MH Criqui E Barrett-Connor M Austin, American journal of epidemiology 1978 108 5 367 372 727205
Response rates to a questionnaire 26 years after baseline examination with minimal interim participant contact and baseline differences between respondents and nonrespondents. A Pirzada LL Yan DB Garside L Schiffer AR Dyer ML Daviglus, American journal of epidemiology 2004 159 1 94 101 10.1093/aje/kwh012 14693664
Evaluation of non-response bias in mental health determinants and outcomes in a large sample of pre-adolescents. AF de Winter AJ Oldehinkel R Veenstra JA Brunnekreef FC Verhulst J Ormel, European journal of epidemiology 2005 20 2 173 181 10.1007/s10654-004-4948-6 15792285
Characteristics of respondents and non-respondents from a case-control study of breast cancer in younger women. MP Madigan R Troisi N Potischman D Brogan MD Gammon KE Malone LA Brinton, Int J Epidemiol 2000 29 5 793 798 10.1093/ije/29.5.793 11034958
A population comparison of participants and nonparticipants in a health survey. RC Klesges JE Williamson GW Somes GW Talcott HA Lando CK Haddock, American journal of public health 1999 89 8 1228 1231 10.2105/AJPH.89.8.1228 10432911
Characteristics of self-selected responders to a health risk appraisal: generalizability of corporate health assessments. WD Lynch TJ Golaszewski A Clearie DM Vickery, American journal of public health 1989 79 7 887 888 10.2105/AJPH.79.7.887 2735480
Non-response in a population study after an environmental disaster. K Foster D Campbell J Crum M Stove, Public health 1995 109 4 267 273 10.1016/S0033-3506(95)80204-5 7667491
Investigating non-response bias in a survey of disablement in the community: implications for survey methodology. A Tennant EM Badley, Journal of epidemiology and community health 1991 45 3 247 250 10.1136/jech.45.3.247 1836811
Socioeconomic, demographic, occupational, and health factors associated with participation in a long-term epidemiologic survey: a prospective study of the French GAZEL cohort and its target population. M Goldberg JF Chastang A Leclerc M Zins S Bonenfant I Bugel N Kaniewski A Schmaus I Niedhammer M Piciotti, et al. American journal of epidemiology 2001 154 4 373 384 10.1093/aje/154.4.373 11495861
The Tromso Heart Study: responders and non-responders to a health questionnaire, do they differ? BK Jacobsen DS Thelle, Scandinavian journal of social medicine 1988 16 2 101 104 3387934
Postal survey on airborne occupational exposure and respiratory disorders in Norway: causes and consequences of non-response. P Bakke A Gulsvik P Lilleng O Overa R Hanoa GE Eide, Journal of epidemiology and community health 1990 44 4 316 320 10.1136/jech.44.4.316 2277255
Recruitment of adults 65 years and older as participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study. GS Tell LP Fried B Hermanson TA Manolio AB Newman NO Borhani, Ann Epidemiol 1993 3 4 358 366 10.1016/1047-2797(93)90062-9 8275211
Non-participation and mortality in a prospective study of cardiovascular disease. M Walker AG Shaper DG Cook, Journal of epidemiology and community health 1987 41 4 295 299 10.1136/jech.41.4.295 3455423
Sickness absence as a measure of health status and functioning: from the UK Whitehall II study. M Marmot A Feeney M Shipley F North SL Syme, Journal of epidemiology and community health 1995 49 2 124 130 10.1136/jech.49.2.124 7798038
CARDIA: study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects. GD Friedman GR Cutter RP Donahue GH Hughes SB Hulley DR Jacobs K Liu PJ Savage, Journal of clinical epidemiology 1988 41 11 1105 1116 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90080-7 3204420