[en] The aim of this study was to explore the role of expectancies and beliefs about the potential effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) (what the subject thought the effect was going to be) and the effects of 50 Hz magnetic fields (400 microT(rms)) acute exposure on cognitive performance, the reporting of physical symptoms and some psychological and physiological parameters. Seventy-four healthy male volunteers aged between 40 and 60 years of age were randomly assigned to one of five groups, which differed in (1) the type of information they were given concerning the expected magnetic field effect on performance in cognitive tests (positive = enhancement of the performance; negative = impairment of the performance; neutral) and (2) the type of exposure (real or sham). Three groups were sham exposed with positive (group+), negative (group-) and neutral information (group+/-); one group was really exposed with neutral information (group expo) and one group was not exposed, though they wore the helmet, and did not receive any field-related information (control group). All the volunteers, except the control group, were led to believe that they would be exposed to a magnetic field of 400 microT(rms). The experimental design respected a double blind procedure and the experimental session involved three steps (pre-testing, exposure, and post-testing). Various measurements were taken, including cognitive performance, psychological parameters such as mood, vigilance, and reporting of symptoms. Physiological parameters such as blood pressure and pulse rate were also recorded. The information given did not significantly modify beliefs. No significant difference was found among the five groups depending on the type of information and the type of exposure in cognitive performance, psychological and physiological parameters. In the context of the study, with our population, the type of information given failed to induce expected changes in parameters measured. Our results do not support the hypothesis that an acute exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields (50 Hz, 400 microT(rms)) affects the parameters measured.
Disciplines :
Neurosciences & behavior
Author, co-author :
Nevelsteen, Sophie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Psychiatrie et psychologie médicale
Legros, Jean-Jacques ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Département des sciences cliniques
Crasson, Marion ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Psychiatrie et psychologie médicale
Language :
English
Title :
Effects of information and 50 Hz magnetic fields on cognitive performance and reported symptoms
Publication date :
January 2007
Journal title :
Bioelectromagnetics
ISSN :
0197-8462
eISSN :
1521-186X
Publisher :
Wiley Liss, Inc., Hoboken, United States - New Jersey
Andersson B, Berg M, Arnetz BB, Melin L, Langlet I, Liden S. 1996. A cognitive-behavioral treatment of patient suffering from "electric hypersensitivity". Subjective effects and reactions in a double-blind provocation study. J Occup Environ Med 38:752-758.
Barsky AJ, Saintfort R, Rogers MP, Borus JF. 2002. Nonspecific medication side effects and the nocebo phenomenon. JAMA 287:622-627.
Bergqvist U, Vogel E. 1997. Possible health implication of subjective symptoms and electromagnetic fields. A report by a European group of experts for the European Commission, DG V. Solna, Sweden: National Institute for Working Life.
Bergqvist U, Hillert L, Birke E. 2000. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity and health risks from electric and magnetic fields. A research review and evaluation (in Swedish, English summary). Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish Council for Work Life Research.
Bock KW, Birbaumer N. 1997. MCS (Multiple Chemical Sensitivity): Cooperation between toxicology and psychology may facilitate solutions of the problems (commentary). Hum Exp Toxicol 16:481-484.
Bouvard M, Ayxeres-Vinghetto A, Dupont H, Aupetit J, Portalier S, Arrindell W. 2003. Index de la sensibilité à l'anxié té-révisé (anxiety sensibility index revised): Validation préliminaire de la version française. Encephale 29:157-164.
Carroll BJ, Feinberg M, Smouse PE, Rawson SG, Greden JF. 1981. The carroll rating scale for depression: I. Development, reliability and validation. Br J Psychiatry 138:194-200.
Charles G, Frydman O, Bonami T, Hershkowitz C, Tilmant JJ, Wilmotte J, Mendlewicz J. 1986. Adaptation française et validation du "Carroll rating scale for depression". Encephale 12:299-301.
Cook MR, Graham C, Cohen HD, Gerkovich MM. 1992. A replication study of human exposure to 60-Hz fields: Effects on neurobehavioral measures. Bioelectromagnetics 13:261-285.
Cook CM, Thomas AW, Prato FS. 2002. Human electrophysiological and cognitive effects of exposure to ELF magnetic and ELF modulated RF and microwave fields: A review of recent studies. Bioelectromagnetics 23:144-157.
Crasson M. 2005. L'hypersensibilité à l'é lectricité: Une approche multidisciplinaire pour un problème multifactoriel. Revue de la littérature. Eur Rev Appl Psychol 55:51-67.
Crasson M, Legros JJ. 2005. Absence of daytime 50 Hz, 100 μT rms magnetic field or bright light exposure effect on human performance and psychophysiological parameters. Bioelectromagnetics 26:225-233.
Crasson M, Timsit-Berthier M, Legros JJ. 1993. Contribution à l'étude des effets de l'exposition à des champs magnétiques 50 Hz sur certains paramètres neuropsychologiques et neuroendocriniens. Psychol Med (Paris) 25:1341-1346.
Crasson M, Legros JJ, Scarpa P, Legros W. 1999. 50 Hz magnetic field exposure influence on human performance and psychophysiological parameters: Two double-blind experimental studies. Bioelectromagnetics 20:474-486.
Delhez M, Legros JJ, Crasson M. 2004. No influence of 20 and 400 μT, 50 Hz magnetic field exposure on cognitive function in humans. Bioelectromagnetics 25:592-598.
Fillmore MT, Vogel-Sprott M. 1992. Expected effect of caffeine on motor performance predicts the type of response to placebo. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 106:209-214.
Fillmore MT, Mulvihill LE, Vogel-Sprott M. 1994. The expected drug and its expected effect interact to determine placebo responses to alcohol and caffeine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 115:383-388.
Fillmore MT, Carscadden JL, Vogel-Sprott M. 1998. Alcohol, cognitive impairment and expectancies. J Stud Alcohol 59: 174-179.
Finnigan F, Hammersley R, Millar K. 1995. The effects of expectancy and alcohol on cognitive-motor performance. Addiction 90:661-672.
Frick U, Rehm J, Eichhammer P. 2002. Risk perception, somatization, and self report of complaints related to electromagnetic fields-A randomised survey study. Int J Hyg Environ Health 205:353-360.
Graham C, Cook MR, Cohen HD, Gerkovich MM. 1994. Dose response study of human exposure to 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics 15:447-463.
Hillert L. 2001. Hypersensitivity to electricity: Symptoms, risk factors and therapeutic interventions. PhD thesis. In Karolinska Institut, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hillert L, Kolmodin-Hedman B. 1997. Hypersensitivity to electricity: Sense or sensibility? J Psychosom Res 42:427-432.
Hillert L, Hedman BK, Soderman E, Arnetz BB. 1999. Hypersensitivity to electricity: Working definition and additional characterization of the syndrome. J Psychosom Res 47:429-438.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). 2003. Exposure to static and low frequency electromagnetic fields, biological effects and health consequences (0-100 kHz). München, Germany: Märkl-Druck.
Joffres MR, Williams T, Sabo B, Fox RA. 2001. Environmental sensitivities: Prevalence of major symptoms in a referral center: The Nova Scotia environmental sensitivities research center study. Environ Health Perspect 109:161-165.
Keetley V, Wood A, Sadafi H, Stough C. 2001. Neuropsychological sequelae of 50 Hz magnetic fields. Int J Radiat Biol 77:735-742.
Kirsch I. 1997. Specifying nonspecifics: Psychological mechanisms of placebo effects. In: Harrington A, editor. The placebo effect: An interdisciplinary exploration. Boston, London: Harvard University Press. pp 166-185.
Kirsch I, Weixel LJ. 1988. Double-blind versus deceptive administration of a placebo. Behav Neurosci 102:319-323.
Kurokawa Y, Nitta H, Imai H, Kabuto M. 2003. No influence of short-term exposure to 50-Hz magnetic fields on cognitive performance function in human. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 76:437-442.
Lang A, Dhillon K, Dong Q. 1995. The effects of emotional arousal and valence on television viewers' cognitive capacity and memory. J Broadcasting Electron Media 39:313-327.
Lonne-Rahm S, Andersson B, Melin L, Schultzberg M, Arnetz B, Berg M. 2000. Provocation with stress and electricity of patients with "sensitivity to electricity". J Occup Environ Med 42:512-516.
Lyskov E, Sandström M, Hansson Mild K. 2001. Provocation study of persons with perceived electrical hypersensitivity and controls using magnetic field exposure and recording of electrophysiological characteristics. Bioelectromagnetics 22:457-462.
MacGregor DG, Fleming R. 1996. Risk perception and symptom reporting. Risk Anal 16:773-783.
McMahan S, Meyer J. 1995. Symptom prevalence and worry about high voltage transmission lines. Environ Res 70:114-118.
McNair D, Lorr M, Droppelman LF. 1971. EITS manual for the profile of mood states. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
Mechanic D. 1980. The experience and reporting of common physical complaints. J Health Soc Behav 21:146-155.
Norris H. 1971. The action of sedative on brain stem oculomoteur systems in man. Neuropharmacology 10:182-192.
Pennebaker JW. 1994. Psychological bases of symptom reporting: Perceptual and emotional aspects of chemical sensitivity. Toxicol Ind Health 10:497-511.
Rubin GJ, Munchi JD, Wessely S. 2005. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: A systematic review of provocation studies. Psychosom Med 67:224-232.
Sandström M, Lyskov E, Berglund A, Medvedev S, Hansson Mild K. 1997. Neurophysiological effects of flickering light in patients with perceived electrical hypersensitivity. J Occup Environ Med 39:15-22.
Schweiger A, Parducci A. 1981. Nocebo: The psychologic induction of pain. Pavlov J Biol Sci 16:140-143.
Spielberger CD. 1993. Inventaire d'anxiété état-trait: Forme Y (STAI-Y). Paris: Les éditions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
Taylor S, Cox BJ. 1998. An expanded Anxiety Sensitivity Index: Evidence for a hierarchic structure in a clinical sample. J Anxiety Disord 12:463-483.
Van den Bergh O, Winters W, Devriese S, Van Diest I, Vos G, De Peuter S. 2004. Accuracy of respiratory symptom perception in persons with high and low negative affectivity. Psychol Health 19:213-222.
Walach H, Schmidt S, Dirhold T, Nosch S. 2002. The effects of a caffeine placebo and suggestion on blood pressure, heart rate, well-being and cognitive performance. Int J Psychophysiol 43:247-260.
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:1063-1070.
Winters W, Devriese S, Van Diest I, Nemery B, Veulemans H, Eelen P, Van de Woestijne KP, Van den Bergh O. 2003. Media warnings about environmental pollution facilitate the acquisition of symptoms in response to chemical substances. Psychosom Med 65:332-338.
Zimmermann P, Fimm B. 1994. Tests d'évaluation de l'attention (TEA). Würselen: Psytest.
