The influence of encoding style on the production of false memories in the DRM paradigm: New insights on individual differences in false memory susceptibility?
Dehon, Hedwige; Laroi, Frank; Van der Linden, Martial
2011 • In Personality and Individual Differences, 50 (5), p. 583-587
[en] Recent research has shown that there are individual differences in how preexisting (internal)
schemata (versus cues from the outside world) affect encoding processes, which can be
reliably assessed with the internal and external Encoding Style Questionnaire (ESQ, Lewicki,
2005). Since reliance on preexisting schemata at encoding has been found to increase the
production of false memories in the DRM paradigm (Roediger & McDermott, 1995), while
item-specific encoding has been shown to reduce it (see Gallo, 2006), it was examined
whether individual differences in encoding style affects the production of such false
memories. To this purpose, normal participants were asked to complete a French version of
the ESQ questionnaire (Billieux et al., 2009) and were presented with a modified DRM
procedure (Brédart, 2000) assessing false recall. The results showed a positive correlation
between ESQ scores and false recall showing that internal encoders were more susceptible to
false memories than external encoders.
Research Center/Unit :
Centre de Neurosciences Cognitives et Comportementales - ULiège
Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Author, co-author :
Dehon, Hedwige ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cognitives > Psychologie cognitive
Laroi, Frank ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cognitives > Psychologie clinique cognitive et comportementale
Van der Linden, Martial ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cognitives > Psychopathologie cognitive
Language :
English
Title :
The influence of encoding style on the production of false memories in the DRM paradigm: New insights on individual differences in false memory susceptibility?
Alternative titles :
[fr] influence du style d'encodage sur la production de faux souvenirs
Publication date :
2011
Journal title :
Personality and Individual Differences
ISSN :
0191-8869
eISSN :
1873-3549
Publisher :
Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science, Oxford, United Kingdom
Billieux J., D'Argembeau A., Lewicki P., Van der Linden M. A French adaptation of the internal and external encoding style questionnaire and its relationships with impulsivity. European Review of Applied Psychology - Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée 2009, 59:3-8.
Brainerd C.J., Reyna V.F. Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2002, 11:164-168.
Brédart S. When false memories do not occur: Not thinking of the lure or remembering that it was not heard?. Memory 2000, 8:123-128.
Broadbent D.E., Cooper P.F., Fitzgerald P., Parkes K.R. The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 1982, 21:1-16.
Brown K.W., Ryan R.M. The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 84:822-848.
Chan J.C.K., McDermott K.B., Watson J.M., Gallo D.A. The importance of material-processing interactions in inducing false memories. Memory and Cognition 2005, 33:389-395.
Deese J. On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1959, 58:17-22.
Dehon H. Variations in processing resources and resistance to false memories in younger and older adults. Memory 2006, 14:692-711.
Dehon H., Bastin C., Larøi F. The influence of delusional ideation and dissociative experiences on the resistance to false memories in normal healthy subjects. Personality and Individual Differences 2008, 45:62-67.
Gallo D.A. Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks 2006, Psychology press, New York.
Geraerts E., Smeets E., Jelicic M., van Heerden J., Merckelbach H. Fantasy proneness, but not self-reported trauma is related to DRM performance of women reporting recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse. Consciousness and Cognition 2005, 14:602-612.
Herndon F. Testing mindfulness with perceptual and cognitive factors: External vs. internal encoding, and the cognitive failures questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences 2008, 44:32-41.
Horselenberg R., Merckelbach H., Wessel I., Verhoeven C., Zeles G. Absorption, fantasy proneness and the false fame effect. Personality and Individual Differences 2006, 41:501-511.
James W. The principles of psychology 1890, Henry Holt & Co., New York.
Lampinen J.M., Neuschatz J.S., Payne D.G. Memory illusions and consciousness: Examining the phenomenology of true and false memories. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social 1998, 16:181-224.
Lewicki P. Internal and external encoding style and social motivation. Social motivation: Conscious and inconscious processes 2005, pp. 194-209, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. J.P. Forgas, K.D. Williams, S.M. Laham (Eds.).
Lewicki P., Hill T., Czyzewska M. Nonconscious acquisition of information. American Psychologist 1992, 47:796-801.
Lewicki P., Hill T., Sasaki I. Self-perpetuating development of encoding biases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1989, 118:323-337.
Mc Dermott K.B., Watson J.M. The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation duration. Journal of Memory and Language 2001, 45:160-176.
Merckelbach H. Telling a good story: Fantasy proneness and the quality of fabricated memories. Personality and Individual Differences 2004, 37:1371-1382.
Merckelbach H., Horselenberg R., Muris P. The creative experiences questionnaire (CEQ): A brief self-report measure of fantasy proneness. Personality and Individual Differences 2001, 31:987-995.
Roediger H.L., McDermott K.B. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 1995, 21:803-814.
Roediger H.L., Watson J.M., McDermott K.B., Gallo D.A. Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2001, 8:385-407.
Schacter D.L., Israel L., Racine C. Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 40:1-24.
Toglia M.P., Neuschatz J.S., Goodwin K.A. Recall accuracy and illusory memories: When more is less. Memory 1999, 7:233-256.