Excavation; Inverse Analysis; Optimization; Soil behaviour; Neural network material model
Abstract :
[en] Performance observation is a necessary part of the design and construction process in geotechnical engineering. For deep urban excavations, empirical and numerical methods are used to predict potential deformations and their impacts on surrounding structures. Two inverse analysis approaches are described and compared for an excavation project in downtown Chicago. The first approach is a parameter optimization approach based on genetic algorithm (GA). GA is a stochastic global search technique for optimizing an objective function with linear or non-linear constraints. The second approach, self-learning simulations (SelfSim), is an inverse analysis technique that combines finite element method, continuously evolving material models, and field measurements. The optimization based on genetic algorithm approach identifies material properties of an existing soil model, and SelfSim approach extracts the underlying soil behavior unconstrained by a specific assumption on soil constitutive behavior. The two inverse analysis approaches capture well lateral wall deflections and maximum surface settlements. The GA optimization approach tends to overpredict surface settlements at some distance from the excavation as it is constrained by a specific form of the material constitutive model (i.e. hardening soil model); while the surface settlements computed using SelfSim approach match the observed ones due to its ability to learn small strain non-linearity of soil implied in the measured settlements.
Disciplines :
Civil engineering
Author, co-author :
Hashash, Youssef
Levasseur, Séverine ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département Argenco : Secteur GEO3 > Géomécanique et géologie de l'ingénieur
Osouli, Abdolreza
Finno, Richard
Malécot, Yann
Language :
English
Title :
Comparison of two inverse analysis techniques for learning deep excavation response
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
ABAQUS. ABAQUS/Standard, A general purpose finite element code. Pawtucket (RI): ABAQUS, Inc., formerly Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc.; 2005.
Anandarajah A., and Agarwal D. Computer-aided calibration of a soil plasticity model. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 15 12 (1991) 835-856
Arai K., Ohta H., and Kojima K. Application of back analysis to several test embankments on soft clay deposits. Soil Found 26 2 (1986) 60-72
Brinkgreve RBJ. Plaxis v8; 2003.
Calvello M. Inverse analysis of a supported excavation through Chicago glacial clays (2002), Northwestern University, Evanston (IL)
Calvello M., and Finno R.J. Selecting parameters to optimize in model calibration by inverse analysis. Comput Geotech 31 5 (2004) 410-424
Chung C.K., and Finno R.J. Influence of depositional processes on the geotechnical parameters of Chicago glacial clay. Eng Geol 32 (1992) 225-242
Cividini A., and Rossi A.Z. The consolidation problem treated by a consistent (static) finite element approach. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 7 (1983) 435-455
Finno R.J., and Calvello M. Supported excavations: observational method and inverse modeling. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131 7 (2005) 826-836
Finno R.J., and Roboski J.F. Three-dimensional responses of a tiedback excavation through clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131 3 (2005) 272-283
Fu Q, Hashash YMA,Ghaboussi J. Non-uniformity of stress states within a dense sand specimen. In: Geo-Denver 2007, Denver, Co.; 2007.
Fu Q., Hashash Y.M.A., Jung S., and Ghaboussi J. Integration of laboratory testing and constitutive modeling of soils. Comput Geotech 34 5 (2007) 330-345
Gens A., Ledesma A., and Alonso E.E. Estimation of parameters in geotechnical back analysis. 2. Application to a tunnel excavation problem. Comput Geotech 18 1 (1996) 29-46
Ghaboussi J. Biologically inspired soft computing methods in structural mechanics and engineering. Struct Eng Mech 11 5 (2001) 485-502
Ghaboussi J., Garrett J.H., and Wu X. Knowledge-based modeling of material behaviour with neural networks. J Eng Mech Div 117 1 (1991) 132-153
Ghaboussi J., Pecknold D.A., Zhang M.F., and Haj-Ali R.M. Autoprogressive training of neural network constitutive models. Int J Numer Methods Eng 42 1 (1998) 105-126
Ghaboussi J, Sidarta DE. New method of material modeling using neural networks. In: Sixth international symposium on numerical models in geomechanics, Montreal, Canada; 1997.
Gioda G., and Locatelli L. Back analysis of the measurements performed during the excavation of a shallow tunnel in sand. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 23 (1999) 1407-1425
Gioda G., and Sakurai S. Back analysis procedures for the interpretation of field measurements in geomechanics. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 11 (1987) 555-583
Goldberg DE. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison Wesley Publishing Company; 1989.
Hashash YMA, Fu Q, Ghaboussi J, Lade PV, Saucier C. Inverse analysis based interpretation of sand behavior from triaxial shear tests subjected to full end restraint. Canadian Geotech J, in press.
Hashash Y.M.A., Marulanda C., Ghaboussi J., and Jung S. Systematic update of a deep excavation model using field performance data. Comput Geotech 30 (2003) 477-488
Hashash Y.M.A., Marulanda C., Ghaboussi J., and Jung S. Novel approach to integration of numerical modeling and field observations for deep excavations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132 8 (2006) 1019-1031
Hashash Y.M.A., and Whittle A.J. Ground movement prediction for deep excavations in soft clay. J Geotech Eng 122 6 (1996) 474-486
Hashash Y.M.A., and Whittle A.J. Mechanisms of load transfer and arching for braced excavations in clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128 3 (2002) 187-197
Honjo Y., Wen-Tsung L., and Guha S. Inverse analysis of an embankment on soft clay by extended Bayesian method. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 18 (1994) 709-734
Jollifle IT. Principal component analysis. NY; 2002.
Ladd CC, Edgers L. Consolidated-undrained direct simple shear test on Boston Blue Clay. Research report R72-82. Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA; 1972.
Levasseur S. Analyse inverse en geotechnique: developement d'une methode base d'algorithmes genetiques. Grenoble, France: Universite Joseph Fourier, 2007.
Levasseur S., Malecot Y., Boulon M., and Flavigny E. Soil parameter identification using a genetic algorithm. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32 2 (2008) 189-213
Levasseur S., Malecot Y., Boulon M., and Flavigny E. Statistical inverse analysis based on genetic algorithm and principal component analysis: method and developments using synthetic data. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 33 12 (2009) 1485-1511
Levasseur S, Malecot Y, Boulon M, Flavigny E. Statistical inverse analysis based on genetic algorithm and principal component analysis: applications to excavation problems and pressuremeter tests. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech, in press. doi: 10.1002/nag.776.
Marulanda C. Integration of numerical modeling and field observations of deep excavations. Civil and Environmental Engineering. Urbana, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2005. 269 p.
Osouli A. The interplay between field measurements and soil behavior for learning supported excavation response. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ph.D. Thesis, Urbana, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2009.
Osouli A, Hashash YMA. Learning of soil behavior from measured response of a full scale test wall in sandy soil. In: 6th International conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering, Arlington, VA, August 11-16, 2008.
Ou C.Y., and Tang Y.G. Soil parameter determination for deep excavation analysis by optimization. J Chinese Inst Eng 17 5 (1994) 671-688
Pande GN, Shin HS. Finite elements with artificial intelligence. In: Eighth international symposium on numerical models in geomechanics - NUMOG VIII. Italy: Balkema; 2002.
Pestana J.M., Whittle A.J., and Gens A. Evaluation of a constitutive model for clays and sands: part II - clay behaviour. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 26 11 (2002) 1123-1146
PLAXIS-B.V. PLAXIS: finite element package for analysis of geotechnical structures. Delft, Netherland; 2002.
Renders JM. Algorithmes genetiques et reseaux de neurones. Hermes; 1994.
Samarajiva P., Macari E.J., and Wathugala W. Genetic algorithms for the calibration of constitutive models of soils. Int J Geomech 5 3 (2005) 206-217
Shin H.S., and Pande G.N. On self-learning finite element codes based on monitored response of structures. Comput Geotech 27 7 (2000) 161-178
Sidarta D.E., and Ghaboussi J. Constitutive modeling of geomaterials from non-uniform material tests. Int J Comput Geotech 22 1 (1998) 53-71
Song H, Osouli A, Hashash Y. Soil behavior and excavation instrumentation layout. In: 7th International symposium on field measurements in geomechanics FMGM 2007, Boston, MA; 2007.
Tarantola A. Inverse problem theory. Elsevier Science BV; 1987.
Terzaghi K., Peck R.B., and Mesri G. Soil mechanics in engineering practice (1996), Wiley, New York
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.