One-year effectiveness and safety in young children aged 2-6 years with type 1 diabetes using an automated insulin delivery system: A real-world prospective cohort study. - 2026
One-year effectiveness and safety in young children aged 2-6 years with type 1 diabetes using an automated insulin delivery system: A real-world prospective cohort study.
De Meulemeester, Jolien; Valgaerts, Laura; Tenoutasse, Sylvieet al.
2026 • In Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 28 (1), p. 551-561
[en] AIMS: This study evaluated 1-year real-world changes in glycaemic management, parent-reported outcomes and safety with an automated insulin delivery (AID) system in young children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children aged 2-6 years whose parents agreed to initiate the Medtronic MiniMed™ 780G were enrolled at 15 centres between October 2022 and December 2023. Data were collected quarterly over 1 year during routine follow-up. Parent-reported outcomes were assessed using questionnaires (HAPPI-D [part of the HAPPI-D Protocol; Hvidøre, Adolescent, Parent, Professional, Instrument, Diabetes] and Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey [HFS]-Parent). The primary endpoint was the evolution of time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL) from start to 12 months after start. Data are reported as mean ± SD or least-squares mean (95% confidence interval). RESULTS: A total of 149 children were included (mean age 4.2 ± 1.4 years; 56.4% girls). Mean T1D duration was 22.0 ± 13.0 months and 75.2% used an insulin pump before. After 1 year, TIR increased from 56.8% (54.4-59.2) to 66.6% (64.7-68.5) and haemoglobin A1c decreased from 7.6% (7.4-7.8) to 7.2% (7.1-7.4) (all p < 0.001). Time <70 mg/dL remained stable (5.0% [4.2-5.8] at start vs. 4.6% [3.9-5.3] at 12 months, p = 0.172). Parents reported less diabetes burden on the HAPPI-D (22.9 points [21.7-24.0] at start vs. 21.7 points [20.5-22.8] at 12 months, p = 0.001), while scores on the HFS-Parent did not change significantly. There were no hospitalisations for severe hypoglycaemic events and one for diabetic ketoacidosis due to infusion set occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: One-year use of an AID system in young children with T1D was safe and associated with improved glycaemic management and reduced parental burden, with limited impact on time in hypoglycaemia and related parental fear.
Disciplines :
Pediatrics Endocrinology, metabolism & nutrition
Author, co-author :
De Meulemeester, Jolien ; Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven-Department of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Valgaerts, Laura ; Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven-Department of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Tenoutasse, Sylvie; Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola (HUDERF), Brussels, Belgium.
Gies, Inge; Department of Paediatrics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
den Brinker, Marieke; Department of Paediatric Endocrinology & Diabetology, University Hospital Antwerp-Lab of Experimental Medicine and Paediatrics, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Fudvoye, Julie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique
Mouraux, Thierry; Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, University Hospital Center UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium.
Louis, Jacques; Department of Paediatrics, Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium.
Lambert, Sophie; Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Clinique CHC Montlégia, Liège, Belgium.
Van Loocke, Marlies; Department of Paediatrics, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
Smeets, Goele; Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Lemay, Annelies; Department of Paediatrics, AZ Turnhout, Turnhout, Belgium.
Ryckx, Sofie; Department of Paediatrics, ZAS Paola, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Depoorter, Sylvia; Department of Paediatrics, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge, Bruges, Belgium.
Van Aken, Sara; Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Maris, Ellen; Department of Paediatrics, VITAZ, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Mathieu, Chantal ; Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven-Department of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gillard, Pieter ; Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven-Department of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Casteels, Kristina ; Department of Paediatrics, University Hospitals Leuven-Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
One-year effectiveness and safety in young children aged 2-6 years with type 1 diabetes using an automated insulin delivery system: A real-world prospective cohort study.
Sundberg F, DeBeaufort C, Krogvold L, et al. ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 2022: managing diabetes in preschoolers. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022;23(8):1496-1511. doi:10.1111/pedi.13427
Di Molfetta S, Di Gioia L, Caruso I, et al. Efficacy and safety of different hybrid closed loop systems for automated insulin delivery in people with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024;40(6):e3842. doi:10.1002/DMRR.3842
Biester T, Berget C, Boughton C, et al. International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2024: diabetes technologies – insulin delivery. Horm Res Paediatr. 2024;97(6):636-662. doi:10.1159/000543034
Boughton CK, Hovorka R. The role of automated insulin delivery technology in diabetes. Diabetologia. 2024;67(10):2034-2044. doi:10.1007/S00125-024-06165-W
Battelino T, Kuusela S, Shetty A, et al. Efficacy and safety of automated insulin delivery in children aged 2–6 years (LENNY): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, crossover trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2025;13:662-673. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(25)00091-9
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Use of Real-World Evidence to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Medical Devices. 2018. Accessed July 2, 2025 https://www.fda.gov/media/120060/download
Pulkkinen MA, Varimo TJ, Hakonen ET, et al. MiniMed 780G™ in 2-to 6-year-old children: safety and clinical outcomes after the first 12 weeks. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023;25(2):100-107. doi:10.1089/DIA.2022.0313
Pulkkinen MA, Varimo TJ, Hakonen ET, Hero MT, Miettinen PJ, Tuomaala AK. During an 18-month course of automated insulin delivery treatment, children aged 2 to 6 years achieve and maintain a higher time in tight range. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024;26(6):2431-2438. doi:10.1111/dom.15562
Tornese G, Carletti C, Lanzetta MA, Tamaro G, Barbi E, Faleschini E. Safety of real-life usage of advanced hybrid closed-loop system MiniMed 780G in children with type 1 diabetes younger than 7 years old. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(6):e123-e125. doi:10.2337/dc22-2046
Abraham MB, Smith GJ, Dart J, Davis EA, Jones TW. Clinical outcomes with MiniMedTM 780G advanced hybrid closed-loop therapy in 2- to 6-year-old children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024;26(5):341-345. doi:10.1089/dia.2023.0508
López-López S, Díaz-Martín C, García-de Pablo I, et al. Real world efficacy and safety of the advanced hybrid closed-loop system MiniMed 780G (SmartGuard) in children under 7 years of age. Front Med. 2024;11:11. doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1465800
Battelino T, Alexander CM, Amiel SA, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring and metrics for clinical trials: an international consensus statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023;11(1):42-57. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00319-9
Roelants M, Hauspie R, Hoppenbrouwers K. References for growth and pubertal development from birth to 21 years in Flanders, Belgium. Ann Hum Biol. 2009;36(6):680-694. doi:10.3109/03014460903049074
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.; 1988.
Ware J, Allen JM, Boughton CK, et al. Randomized trial of closed-loop control in very young children with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(3):209-219. doi:10.1056/NEJMOA2111673
Sherr JL, Bode BW, Forlenza GP, et al. Safety and glycemic outcomes with a tubeless automated insulin delivery system in very young children with type 1 diabetes: a single-arm multicenter clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(8):1907-1910. doi:10.2337/dc21-2359
Wadwa RP, Reed ZW, Buckingham BA, et al. Trial of hybrid closed-loop control in young children with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(11):991-1001. doi:10.1056/NEJMOA2210834
Omladič JŠ, Ozimič AS, Vovk A, et al. Acute hyperglycemia and spatial working memory in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(8):1941-1944. doi:10.2337/DC20-0171
Reiss AL, Jo B, Arbelaez AM, et al. A pilot randomized trial to examine effects of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system on neurodevelopmental and cognitive outcomes in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4940. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32289-x
Samuelsson U, Anderzen J, Åkesson K, Hanberger L. The importance of low HbA1c during childhood on glycaemic control in adulthood and the risk of late complications. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110(4):1264-1272. doi:10.1111/APA.15591
Castañeda J, Mathieu C, Aanstoot HJ, et al. Predictors of time in target glucose range in real-world users of the MiniMed 780G system. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022;24(11):2212-2221. doi:10.1111/DOM.14807
Arrieta A, Battelino T, Scaramuzza AE, et al. Comparison of MiniMed 780G system performance in users aged younger and older than 15 years: evidence from 12 870 real-world users. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022;24(7):1370-1379. doi:10.1111/DOM.14714
Monnier L, Colette C, Wojtusciszyn A, et al. Toward defining the threshold between low and high glucose variability in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(7):832-838. doi:10.2337/DC16-1769
Bombaci B, Hropot T, Bratina N, et al. Daily carbohydrate entries and glycemic outcomes following automated insulin delivery system initiation in youth with type 1 diabetes: a real-world multinational longitudinal study. Diabetes Care. 2025;48(8):1434-1437. doi:10.2337/DC25-0283
Dehn-Hindenberg A, Saßmann H, Berndt V, et al. Long-term occupational consequences for families of children with type 1 diabetes: the mothers take the burden. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(12):2656-2663. doi:10.2337/DC21-0740
Karakus KE, Sakarya S, Saßmann H, et al. Disparities in responsibility sharing and gender differences in diabetes care: changes in occupational life of parents of children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2023;2023:7166604. doi:10.1155/2023/7166604
Passanisi S, Salzano G, Bombaci B, et al. Sustained effectiveness of an advanced hybrid closed-loop system in a cohort of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a 1-year real-world study. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(6):1084-1091. doi:10.2337/DC23-2311
Lombardo F, Passanisi S, Alibrandi A, et al. MiniMed 780G six-month use in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: clinical targets and predictors of optimal glucose control. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023;25(6):404-413. doi:10.1089/DIA.2022.0491
Zhou Y, Boucsein A, Michaels VR, et al. Predictors of glycaemic improvement in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes and very elevated HbA1c using the MiniMed 780G system. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025;27(4):2138-2146. doi:10.1111/DOM.16210
Choudhary P, Arrieta A, van den Heuvel T, Castañeda J, Smaniotto V, Cohen O. Celebrating the data from 100,000 real-world users of the MiniMed™ 780G system in Europe, Middle East, and Africa collected over 3 years: from data to clinical evidence. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024;26(S3):32-37. doi:10.1089/DIA.2023.0433
Castañeda J, Arrieta A, van den Heuvel T, Battelino T, Cohen O. Time in tight glucose range in type 1 diabetes: predictive factors and achievable targets in real-world users of the MiniMed 780G system. Diabetes Care. 2024;47(5):790-797. doi:10.2337/DC23-1581
Passanisi S, Lombardo F, Mameli C, et al. Safety, metabolic and psychological outcomes of Medtronic MiniMed 780G™ in children, adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. Diabetes Ther. 2024;15(2):343-365. doi:10.1007/S13300-023-01501-6
Bombaci B, Passanisi S, Calderone M, Macrì F, Lombardo F, Salzano G. Long-term use of Minimed™ 780G in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes under real-world conditions: the benefits of optimal settings. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025;27(4):2309-2312. doi:10.1111/DOM.16226
Dekker P, van den Heuvel T, Arrieta A, et al. Twelve-month real-world use of an advanced hybrid closed-loop system versus previous therapy in a Dutch center for specialized type 1 diabetes care. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024;28:19322968241290259. doi:10.1177/19322968241290259
Johns G, Miraglia M. The reliability, validity, and accuracy of self-reported absenteeism from work: a meta-analysis. J Occup Health Psychol. 2015;20(1):1-14. doi:10.1037/A0037754
Keppens G, Spruyt B, Dockx J. Measuring school absenteeism: administrative attendance data collected by schools differ from self-reports in systematic ways. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2623. doi:10.3389/FPSYG.2019.02623