accretion; accretion disks; neutrinos; protoplanetary disks; Sun: abundances; Sun: evolution; Sun: interior; Accretion; Accretion discs; Neutrino; Neutrino fluxes; Protoplanetary disks; Solar modeling; Turbulent mixing; Astronomy and Astrophysics; Space and Planetary Science
Abstract :
[en] Context. Over the last two decades, no standard solar model (SSM) has been able to reproduce all observational data, resulting in active discussions regarding the so-called solar modeling problem. A recent study suggests that the accretion from the protosolar disk onto the proto-Sun could have left a large compositional gradient in the solar interior, in agreement with the low-metallicity (Z) solar surface and the high-Z solar core suggested by spectroscopic and neutrino observations, respectively. In addition, recent analyses have reported low lithium but high beryllium abundances on the solar surface; SSMs predict Li abundances that differ by ∼30σ from the observed value. Aims. We develop solar models and compare them with the Li and Be abundance constraints. Methods. We examined the effect of accretion and turbulent mixing below the base of the surface convective zone. We computed ∼200 solar evolutionary models for each case using target quantities to optimize input parameters, similar to the SSM framework. Results. We confirm that turbulent mixing helps reproduce the surface Li and Be abundances within ∼0.6σ by boosting burning. This suppresses gravitational settling, leading to a better matching of the He surface abundance (≲0.3σ) and a smaller compositional gradient. We derive a new protosolar helium abundance, Yproto = 0.2651 ± 0.0035. Turbulent mixing decreases the central metallicity (Zcenter) by ≈4.4%; meanwhile, our previous study suggests that accretion increases Zcenter by essentially the same percentage. Unfortunately, the reduction in Zcenter implies that our models do not reproduce constraints on observed neutrino fluxes, with differences of 6.2σ for 8B and 2.7σ for CNO. Conclusions. Including turbulent mixing in solar models appears indispensable to reproducing the observed atmospheric abundances of Li and Be. However, the resulting tensions in terms of neutrino fluxes, even in the models with protosolar accretion, show that the solar modeling problem remains, at least partly. We suggest that improved electron screening, as well as other microscopic properties, may help alleviate this problem. An independent confirmation of the neutrino fluxes as measured by the Borexino experiment would also be extremely valuable.
Research Center/Unit :
STAR - Space sciences, Technologies and Astrophysics Research - ULiège
Disciplines :
Space science, astronomy & astrophysics
Author, co-author :
Kunitomo, Masanobu ; Department of Physics, Kurume University, Kurume, Japan ; Université Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange, Nice, France
Buldgen, Gaël ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'astrophysique, géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Astrophysique stellaire théorique et astérosismologie
Guillot, Tristan ; Université Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange, Nice, France
Language :
English
Title :
Solar models with protosolar accretion and turbulent mixing
We thank the anonymous referee for helpful comments that improved this paper. We are also grateful to Ebraheem Farag for his valuable comments on MESA. M.K. thanks Observatoire de la C\u00F4te d\u2019Azur for the hospitality during his long-term stay in Nice. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. JP23K25923, JP24K07099, and JP24K00654. G.B. acknowledges fundings from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS) as a postdoctoral researcher. T.G. acknowledges funding from the Programme National de Plan\u00E9tologie. Numerical computations were carried out on the PC cluster at the Center for Computational Astrophysics, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. Software: MESA (version 12115; Paxton et al. 2011, 2013, 2015, 2018, 2019).We thank the anonymous referee for helpful comments that improved this paper. We are also grateful to Ebraheem Farag for his valuable comments on MESA. M.K. thanks Observatoire de la C\u00F4te d\u2019Azur for the hospiality during his long-term stay in Nice. This work was supported by JSPS KAK-ENHI Grant Nos. JP23K25923, JP24K07099, and JP24K00654. G.B. acknowledges fundings from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS) as a postdoctoral researcher. T.G. acknowledges funding from the Programme National de Plan\u00E9tologie. Numerical computations were carried out on the PC cluster at the Center for Computational Astrophysics, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. Software: MESA (version 12115; Paxton et al. 2011, 2013,2015, 2018, 2019).
Acharya, B., Aliotta, M., Balantekin, A. B., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints [arXiv:2405.06470]
Amard, L., & Matt, S. P. 2023, A&A, 678, A7
Amard, L., Palacios, A., Charbonnel, C., Gallet, F., & Bouvier, J. 2016, A&A, 587, A105
Amarsi, A. M., Ogneva, D., Buldgen, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A128
Amelin, Y., Krot, A. N., Hutcheon, I. D., & Ulyanov, A. A. 2002, Science, 297, 1678
Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481
Asplund, M., Amarsi, A. M., & Grevesse, N. 2021, A&A, 653, A141
Bahcall, J. N., & Ulmer, A. 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 53, 4202
Bahcall, J. N., Basu, S., Pinsonneault, M., & Serenelli, A. M. 2005, ApJ, 618, 1049
Bailey, J. E., Nagayama, T., Loisel, G. P., et al. 2015, Nature, 517, 56
Baraffe, I., & Chabrier, G. 2010, A&A, 521, A44
Baraffe, I., Pratt, J., Vlaykov, D. G., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, A126
Baraffe, I., Constantino, T., Clarke, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A53
Basilico, D., Bellini, G., Benziger, J., et al. 2023, Phys. Rev. D, 108, 102005
Basu, S., & Antia, H. M. 2004, ApJ, 606, L85
Basu, S., Chaplin, W. J., Elsworth, Y., New, R., & Serenelli, A. M. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1403
Borexino Collaboration (Agostini, M., et al.) 2020, Nature, 587, 577
Bouvier, J. 2008, A&A, 489, L53
Brun, A. S., Antia, H. M., Chitre, S. M., & Zahn, J. P. 2002, A&A, 391, 725
Buldgen, G., & Eggenberger, P. 2023, in The Sixteenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, eds. R. Ruffino, & G. Vereshchagin, On Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics, and Relativistic Field Theories, 2848
Buldgen, G., Salmon, S. J. A. J., Noels, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 621, A33
Buldgen, G., Eggenberger, P., Noels, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, L9
Buldgen, G., Noels, A., Scuflaire, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A108
Buldgen, G., Noels, A., Amarsi, A. M., et al. 2025a, A&A, 694, A285
Guillot, T., Fletcher, L. N., Helled, R., et al. 2023, in Protostars and Planets VII, eds. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 534, 947
Hartmann, L., Cassen, P., & Kenyon, S. J. 1997, ApJ, 475, 770
Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., Gullbring, E., & D’Alessio, P. 1998, ApJ, 495, 385
Herwig, F. 2000, A&A, 360, 952
Howard, S., Guillot, T., Bazot, M., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A33
Iess, L., Folkner, W. M., Durante, D., et al. 2018, Nature, 555, 220