Article (Scientific journals)
Comparison of Experimental Pain Modulation by Hypnosis, Virtual Reality and Virtual Reality Hypnosis in Healthy Individuals.
Rousseaux, Floriane; Giguère, Émilie; Landry, Mathieu et al.
2025In European Journal of Pain, 29 (10), p. 70166
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Rousseaux-Guigère_RIII-VRH_EurJofPain2025.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.91 MB) Creative Commons License - Attribution
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
acute pain; experimental pain; hypnosis; nociceptive flexion reflex; virtual reality; virtual reality hypnosis; Humans; Male; Female; Adult; Young Adult; Healthy Volunteers; Pain Measurement; Relaxation Therapy/methods; Hypnosis/methods; Virtual Reality; Pain Management/methods; Pain Perception/physiology; Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy/methods; Pain
Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: Hypnosis (H) and virtual reality (VR) are effective behavioural interventions to influence acute pain perception. Hypnotic suggestions have also been shown to modulate the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR), suggesting the activation of descending modulatory mechanisms affecting spinal nociceptive activity. The combination of these techniques, virtual reality hypnosis (VRH), may reduce pain, but research on their comparative efficacy and mechanisms requires further experimental investigation. This study compared the effects of relaxation hypnosis, VR and VRH on pain perception and nociceptive physiological responses. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy participants were tested at baseline followed by three experimental conditions (relaxation hypnosis, VR, VRH) in a counterbalanced order. Pain intensity and unpleasantness, as well as NFR amplitude evoked by noxious transcutaneous electrical stimulation, were measured. Bayesian statistics assessed evidence for analgesic effects on each variable. RESULTS: The strength of evidence in favour of our hypotheses was categorised as follow: BF = 1-3: anecdotal evidence; BF = 3-10: moderate evidence and BF > 10: strong evidence. For NFR values, Bayesian paired-sample T-tests provided anecdotal support for the efficacy of relaxation hypnosis (BF + 0 = 2.11) and stronger evidence for VR (BF + 0 = 10.94) and VRH (BF + 0 = 14). For pain intensity, moderate evidence supported reductions with relaxation hypnosis (BF + 0 = 9.18), while strong evidence was found for VR (BF + 0 = 27.99) and low to moderate for VRH (BF + 0 = 5.88). Similarly, unpleasantness showed anecdotal reduction with hypnosis (BF + 0 = 1.9), and moderate evidence supported VR (BF + 0 = 4.86) and VRH (BF + 0 = 7.18). Across all measures, no significant differences were found between hypnosis, VR and VRH. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that these techniques did not differentially affect NFR, pain intensity, or unpleasantness. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The strength of this fundamental study is to directly compare hypnosis, VR, and VRH on both pain perception and physiological responses. It shows that VR alone is effective, while adding hypnosis does not always lead to better results and the combination could even create interference in some cases. This article helps to nuance the existing literature and common assumptions about the tool's use. These findings help clarify how VRH works and to propose guidance for clinical practices and further VRH development.
Disciplines :
Alternative medicine
Author, co-author :
Rousseaux, Floriane  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Ergonomie et intervention au travail ; Medical Hypnosis Laboratory, Research Center of Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
Giguère, Émilie;  Research Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie, CRIUGM, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada ; Laboratory of Social Neuroscience and Electrophysiology (LENS), University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
Landry, Mathieu;  Medical Hypnosis Laboratory, Research Center of Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada ; Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience Laboratory (CoCoLab), University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada ; McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
Piché, Mathieu;  Research Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie, CRIUGM, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada ; Département d'Anatomie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada
Mostanadi, Maedeh;  Département d'Anatomie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada
Augier, Pierre;  Medical Hypnosis Laboratory, Research Center of Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
Simon, Jessica  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Psychologie quantitative
Bicego, Aminata Yasmina  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA Neurosciences - Conscious Care Lab ; Leiden University > Cognitive Unit > PRSM
Faymonville, Marie-Elisabeth ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques
Nyssen, Anne-Sophie ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Ergonomie et intervention au travail
Ogez, David;  Medical Hypnosis Laboratory, Research Center of Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Québec, Canada
Rainville, Pierre;  Research Centre, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie, CRIUGM, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada ; Département de Stomatologie, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques
More authors (3 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Comparison of Experimental Pain Modulation by Hypnosis, Virtual Reality and Virtual Reality Hypnosis in Healthy Individuals.
Publication date :
November 2025
Journal title :
European Journal of Pain
ISSN :
1090-3801
eISSN :
1532-2149
Publisher :
Wiley, England
Volume :
29
Issue :
10
Pages :
e70166
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
FRQS - Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
KBS - Koning Boudewijnstichting
Available on ORBi :
since 14 November 2025

Statistics


Number of views
22 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
13 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi