Keywords :
Care; Health outcomes; Nursing homes; Private vs public; Propensity score matching; Humans; Aged; Male; Female; Middle Aged; France; Aged, 80 and over; Propensity Score; Ownership; Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data; Nursing Homes/standards; Home Care Services/statistics & numerical data; Health Status; Home Care Services; Health (social science); History and Philosophy of Science
Abstract :
[en] In this paper, we present estimates of the effect of different care settings on health and well- being outcomes. We use data from the French CARE Survey, which interviews individuals aged 60 and above, to assess the differential effect of living at home or in a nursing home on mortality, morbidity and well-being indicators. In addition, we differentiate the effect between for-profit and non-profit nursing homes. To do so, we apply a propensity score matching approach that controls for selection on observables by matching people living at home with those living in nursing homes. Our results are threefold. First, we observe a positive effect of being in a nursing home on health outcomes but a negative effect on other well-being indicators such as happiness and nervousness. Second, the ownership status of the nursing home matters and the positive effect is stronger for non-profit and public nursing homes. Third, residents in for-profit nursing homes appear to to be worse off than those in nonprofit institutions. These findings raise important questions for the future organization and the funding of long-term care.
Funding text :
This work of the Interdisciplinary Thematic Institute MAKErS, as part of the ITI 2021\u20132028 program of the University of Strasbourg, CNRS and INSERM, was supported by IdEx Unistra (ANR-10-IDEX-0002), and by SFRI-STRAT'US project (ANR-20-SFRI-0012). Bassoli thanks funding from HI-GEN-SHARE GRA101066047.
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0