[en] Agrivoltaics integrates agricultural production with renewable electricity generation on the same land, addressing land-use conflicts while offering benefits for both sectors. However, as with other renewable energy technologies, its implementation risks reinforcing existing socioeconomic inequalities, such as unequal distribution of benefits, exclusion from decision-making, and marginalization of underrepresented voices. This could result in social and environmental harm, including landscape changes. To ensure a just energy transition, the implementation of agrivoltaics must tackle these challenges, balancing decarbonization goals with equity and inclusivity considerations. This study investigates experts' perceptions on the justice implications of agrivoltaics with insights from four European regions across Italy, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands. Building on in-depth semi-structured interviews, this study conducts a comparative analysis of the perceived justice implications of agrivoltaics by applying an environmental and energy justice framework. The findings indicate that while agrivoltaics is perceived to offer economic benefits like additional revenue for farmers and indirect environmental benefits such as improved soil quality, it also raises social and ecological challenges, with benefits often favoring large-scale farmers, landowners, and investors over small farmers and local communities. Excluding small farmers, residents, and ecosystems from decision-making processes exacerbates power imbalances. Early stakeholder involvement can mitigate negative impacts and foster public support by empowering communities. Local engagement, energy communities, financial contributions, and biodiversity restoration efforts are key to restoring fairness. The findings highlight the need for justice-oriented policy frameworks and regulations to ensure an equitable distribution of benefits, inclusive decision-making, and appropriate compensation for any environmental or social harm resulting from agrivoltaics implementation. Future research directions should prioritize further analyses of the restorative justice principle within agrivoltaics. Emphasis should be placed on assessing its capacity to mitigate environmental and social externalities, thereby supporting a more just transition toward renewable energy in rural areas.
Disciplines :
Sociology & social sciences
Author, co-author :
Tomasi, Silvia
Pellegrini, Chiara
Gaspari, Francesca
Vitale, Simone ; Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre
Macarulla Martí, Marcel
Gras, Anna
Gantioler, Sonja
Language :
English
Title :
Agrivoltaics as a win-win for rural regions? Energy and environmental justice perspectives across Italy, Spain, Belgium, and the Netherlands
“Global Market Outlook For Solar Power 2024–2028 - SolarPower Europe.” Accessed: Sep. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: .
I. E. A. IEA, “World Energy Outlook 2021 – Analysis,” Paris, 2021. [Online]. Available: .
“REPowerEU - 2 years on.” Accessed: Mar. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/markets-and-consumers/actions-and-measures-energy-prices/repowereu-2-years_en
C. Rösch and E. Fakharizadehshirazi, “The spatial socio-technical potential of agrivoltaics in Germany,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 202, p. 114706, Sep. 2024, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114706.
J. M. Kiesecker et al., “Land use and Europe'’s renewable energy transition: identifying low-conflict areas for wind and solar development,” Front. Environ. Sci., vol. 12, Apr. 2024, doi:10.3389/fenvs.2024.1355508.
S. Gorjian et al., “Progress and challenges of crop production and electricity generation in agrivoltaic systems using semi-transparent photovoltaic technology,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 158, p. 112126, Apr. 2022, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112126.
G. A. Barron-Gafford et al., “Agrivoltaics provide mutual benefits across the food–energy–water nexus in drylands,” Nat. Sustain., vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 848–855, Sep. 2019, doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0364-5.
H. Dinesh and J. M. Pearce, “The potential of agrivoltaic systems,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 54, pp. 299–308, Feb. 2016, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.024.
S. Amaducci, X. Yin, and M. Colauzzi, “Agrivoltaic systems to optimise land use for electric energy production,” Appl. Energy, vol. 220, pp. 545–561, Jun. 2018, doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.081.
B. A. Johnson, Y. Arino, D. B. Magcale-Macandog, X. Liu, and M. Yamanoshita, “Potential of agrivoltaics in ASEAN considering a scenario where agroforestry expansion is also pursued,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 209, p. 107808, Oct. 2024, doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107808.
A. Chatzipanagi, N. Taylor, and A. Jaeger-Waldau, “Overview of the potential and challenges for Agri-Photovoltaics in the European Union.,” JRC Publications Repository. Accessed: Sep. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC132879
A. Agostini, M. Colauzzi, and S. Amaducci, “Innovative agrivoltaic systems to produce sustainable energy: An economic and environmental assessment,” Appl. Energy, vol. 281, p. 116102, Jan. 2021, doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116102.
R. K. Chopdar, N. Sengar, N. C. Giri, and D. Halliday, “Comprehensive review on agrivoltaics with technical, environmental and societal insights,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 197, p. 114416, Jun. 2024, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114416.
H. Ahlborg et al., “Thirty-five years of research on energy and power: A landscape analysis,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 199, p. 114542, Jul. 2024, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114542.
SolarPower Europe, “Agrisolar Best Practices Guidelines Version 2.0,” 2023. Accessed: Sep. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: .
M. Taylor, J. Pettit, T. Sekiyama, and M. M. Sokołowski, “Justice-driven agrivoltaics: Facilitating agrivoltaics embedded in energy justice,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 188, p. 113815, Dec. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113815.
A. Scognamiglio, “‘Photovoltaic landscapes’: Design and assessment. A critical review for a new transdisciplinary design vision,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 55, pp. 629–661, Mar. 2016, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.072.
G. Torma and J. Aschemann-Witzel, “Social acceptance of dual land use approaches: Stakeholders'’ perceptions of the drivers and barriers confronting agrivoltaics diffusion,” J. Rural Stud., vol. 97, pp. 610–625, Jan. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.01.014.
R. Wüstenhagen, M. Wolsink, and M. J. Bürer, “Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept,” Energy Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2683–2691, May 2007, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001.
K. Langer, T. Decker, and K. Menrad, “Public participation in wind energy projects located in Germany: Which form of participation is the key to acceptance?,” Renew. Energy, vol. 112, pp. 63–73, Nov. 2017, doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.021.
B. K. Sovacool and P. Lakshmi Ratan, “Conceptualizing the acceptance of wind and solar electricity,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 5268–5279, Sep. 2012, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.048.
P. Devine-Wright, Ed., Renewable energy and the public: from NIMBY to participation. London: Routledge, 2015.
B. K. Sovacool, A. Hook, M. Martiskainen, and L. Baker, “The whole systems energy injustice of four European low-carbon transitions,” Glob. Environ. Change, vol. 58, p. 101958, Sep. 2019, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101958.
A. M. Levenda, I. Behrsin, and F. Disano, “Renewable energy for whom? A global systematic review of the environmental justice implications of renewable energy technologies,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 71, p. 101837, Jan. 2021, doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101837.
R. J. Heffron, “Applying energy justice into the energy transition,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 156, p. 111936, Mar. 2022, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111936.
B. K. Sovacool, B. Turnheim, A. Hook, A. Brock, and M. Martiskainen, “Dispossessed by decarbonisation: Reducing vulnerability, injustice, and inequality in the lived experience of low-carbon pathways,” World Dev., vol. 137, p. 105116, Jan. 2021, doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105116.
A. S. Pascaris, C. Schelly, L. Burnham, and J. M. Pearce, “Integrating solar energy with agriculture: Industry perspectives on the market, community, and socio-political dimensions of agrivoltaics,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 75, p. 102023, May 2021, doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102023.
P. Upham, C. Oltra, and À. Boso, “Towards a cross-paradigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 8, pp. 100–112, Jul. 2015, doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.003.
G. Walker, “Renewable energy and the public,” Land Use Policy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 49–59, Jan. 1995, doi:10.1016/0264-8377(95)90074-C.
A. Chalgynbayeva, Z. Gabnai, P. Lengyel, A. Pestisha, and A. Bai, “Worldwide Research Trends in Agrivoltaic Systems—A Bibliometric Review,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 611, Jan. 2023, doi:10.3390/en16020611.
M. Trommsdorff, I. S. Dhal, Ö. E. Özdemir, D. Ketzer, N. Weinberger, and C. Rösch, “Agrivoltaics: solar power generation and food production,” in Solar Energy Advancements in Agriculture and Food Production Systems, Elsevier, 2022, pp. 159–210. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-89866-9.00012-2.
K. Biró-Varga, I. Sirnik, and S. Stremke, “Landscape user experiences of interspace and overhead agrivoltaics: A comparative analysis of two novel types of solar landscapes in the Netherlands,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 109, p. 103408, Mar. 2024, doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103408.
M. Cossu, M. T. Tiloca, A. Cossu, P. A. Deligios, T. Pala, and L. Ledda, “Increasing the agricultural sustainability of closed agrivoltaic systems with the integration of vertical farming: A case study on baby-leaf lettuce,” Appl. Energy, vol. 344, p. 121278, Aug. 2023, doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121278.
R. Maity, K. Sudhakar, A. Abdul Razak, A. Karthick, and D. Barbulescu, “Agrivoltaic: A Strategic Assessment Using SWOT and TOWS Matrix,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 8, p. 3313, Apr. 2023, doi:10.3390/en16083313.
Ministero della Transizione Ecologica, “Linee guida in materia di impianti agrivoltaici,” 2022. [Online]. Available: .
A. V. Klokov, E. Y. Loktionov, Y. V. Loktionov, V. A. Panchenko, and E. S. Sharaborova, “A Mini-Review of Current Activities and Future Trends in Agrivoltaics,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 7, Art. no. 7, Jan. 2023, doi:10.3390/en16073009.
N. C. Giri and R. C. Mohanty, “Turmeric crop farming potential under Agrivoltaic system over open field practice in Odisha, India,” Environ. Dev. Sustain., May 2024, doi:10.1007/s10668-024-05086-3.
D. Ketzer, P. Schlyter, N. Weinberger, and C. Rösch, “Driving and restraining forces for the implementation of the Agrophotovoltaics system technology – A system dynamics analysis,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 270, p. 110864, Sep. 2020, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110864.
D. Ketzer, N. Weinberger, C. Rösch, and S. B. Seitz, “Land use conflicts between biomass and power production – citizens'’ participation in the technology development of Agrophotovoltaics,” J. Responsible Innov., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 193–216, May 2020, doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1647085.
S. Moore, H. Graff, C. Ouellet, S. Leslie, and D. Olweean, “Stakeholder Interactions Around Solar Siting on Agricultural Lands: Toward Socio-Agrivoltaic Interventions,” SSRN Electron. J., 2021, doi:10.2139/ssrn.3981518.
A. S. Pascaris, C. Schelly, M. Rouleau, and J. M. Pearce, “Do agrivoltaics improve public support for solar? A survey on perceptions, preferences, and priorities,” Green Technol. Resil. Sustain., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 8, Oct. 2022, doi:10.1007/s44173-022-00007-x.
M. Cotton, S. Langford, A. Kuria, and K. Parkhill, “A technology to solve the water-energy-food crisis? Mapping sociotechnical configurations of agrivoltaics using Q-methodology,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 119, p. 103872, Jan. 2025, doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103872.
P. Romero-Lankao et al., “A framework to centre justice in energy transition innovations,” Nat. Energy, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1192–1198, Sep. 2023, doi:10.1038/s41560-023-01351-3.
D. McCauley and R. Heffron, “Just transition: Integrating climate, energy and environmental justice,” Energy Policy, vol. 119, pp. 1–7, Aug. 2018, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.014.
X. Wang and K. Lo, “Just transition: A conceptual review,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 82, p. 102291, Dec. 2021, doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102291.
S. Gantioler, “THE RIGHT TO ECOLOGICAL SPACE / IN THE CITY. Operationalising ‘Green Infrastructure’ as strategic urban planning concept for a just access.,” Technical University of Munich, 2018. doi:10.14459/2018MD1428708.
K. Jenkins, “Setting energy justice apart from the crowd: Lessons from environmental and climate justice,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 39, pp. 117–121, May 2018, doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.015.
B. K. Sovacool, M. Martiskainen, A. Hook, and L. Baker, “Decarbonization and its discontents: a critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions,” Clim. Change, vol. 155, no. 4, pp. 581–619, Aug. 2019, doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02521-7.
S. Bouzarovski and N. Simcock, “Spatializing energy justice,” Energy Policy, vol. 107, pp. 640–648, Aug. 2017, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.064.
N. Van Uffelen, B. Taebi, and U. Pesch, “Revisiting the energy justice framework: Doing justice to normative uncertainties,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 189, p. 113974, Jan. 2024, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113974.
N. Van Uffelen, “Revisiting recognition in energy justice,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 92, p. 102764, Oct. 2022, doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102764.
B. K. Sovacool, M. Burke, L. Baker, C. K. Kotikalapudi, and H. Wlokas, “New frontiers and conceptual frameworks for energy justice,” Energy Policy, vol. 105, pp. 677–691, Jun. 2017, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.005.
L. M. Santos Ayllón, K. E. H. Jenkins, and S. Kerr, “Justice by Design: Integrating energy justice and responsible research and innovation (RRI) to deliver just energy futures,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 125, p. 103998, Jul. 2025, doi:.
D. Schlosberg, “Ecological Justice for the Anthropocene,” in Political Animals and Animal Politics, M. Wissenburg and D. Schlosberg, Eds., London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014, pp. 75–89. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-68308-6_6.
M. Forsyth et al., “A future agenda for environmental restorative justice?,” Int. J. Restor. Justice, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–40, Apr. 2021, doi:10.5553/TIJRJ.000063.
R. Killean, “Environmental Restorative Justice in Transitional Settings,” in The Palgrave Handbook of Environmental Restorative Justice, B. Pali, M. Forsyth, and F. Tepper, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 247–273. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04223-2_11.
K. Spangler, E. A. H. Smithwick, S. Buechler, and J. Baka, “Just energy imaginaries? Examining realities of solar development on Pennsylvania'’s farmland,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 108, p. 103394, Feb. 2024, doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103394.
A. Time et al., “Conservation agrivoltaics for sustainable food-energy production,” PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 558–569, May 2024, doi:10.1002/ppp3.10481.
D. Oudes, A. Van Den Brink, and S. Stremke, “Towards a typology of solar energy landscapes: Mixed-production, nature based and landscape inclusive solar power transitions,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 91, p. 102742, Sep. 2022, doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102742.
Department de Territori, Habitatge i Transiciò Ecològica, “Situaciò de les energies renovables a Catalunya y propostes per descarbonitzar la forma de viure y produir a Catalunya.” Generalitat de Catalunya, Sep. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: .
ASTAT, “Südtirol in Zahlen | Alto Adige in cifre,” Landesinstitut für Statistik. Accessed: Nov. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: .
Provincia Autonoma Bolzano, “Modifica del Decreto del Presidente della Provincia 8 aprile 2020, n. 13, ‘Uso dell'energia da fonti rinnovabili.’” Bollettino Ufficiale n. 2/Sez. gen. del 12/01/2023, Jan. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: .
“L'’agri-fotovoltaico sarà consentito per scopi scientifici | Tutte le news | News | Amministrazione provincia Bolzano.” Accessed: Nov. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://news.provincia.bz.it/it/news/l-agri-fotovoltaico-sara-consentito-per-scopi-scientifici
G. Torma and J. Aschemann-Witzel, “Sparking stakeholder support: Creating personas for renewable energy innovation adoption based on qualitative data analysis,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 109, p. 103407, Mar. 2024, doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103407.
A. S. Pascaris, C. Schelly, and J. M. Pearce, “A First Investigation of Agriculture Sector Perspectives on the Opportunities and Barriers for Agrivoltaics,” Agronomy, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 1885, Nov. 2020, doi:10.3390/agronomy10121885.
B. P. Koirala, Y. Araghi, M. Kroesen, A. Ghorbani, R. A. Hakvoort, and P. M. Herder, “Trust, awareness, and independence: Insights from a socio-psychological factor analysis of citizen knowledge and participation in community energy systems,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 38, pp. 33–40, Apr. 2018, doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.009.
M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice, Fourth edition. Los Angeles London New Delhi Singapore Washington DC: SAGE, 2015.
European Parliament & Council, “Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on common rules for the internal market for electricity (recast).” Official Journal of the European Union, L 158, Jun. 05, 2019. [Online]. Available: .
European Parliament & Council, “Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast).” Official Journal of the European Union, L 328, Dec. 11, 2018.
S. R. Arnstein, “A Ladder Of Citizen Participation,” J. Am. Inst. Plann., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 216–224, Jul. 1969, doi:10.1080/01944366908977225.
M. Forsyth, B. Pali, and F. Tepper, “Environmental Restorative Justice: An Introduction and an Invitation,” in The Palgrave Handbook of Environmental Restorative Justice, B. Pali, M. Forsyth, and F. Tepper, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 1–23. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04223-2_1.