2025 • In Turbomachinery: Deposition, Erosion, Fouling, and Icing; Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise and Component Interactions
[en] The purpose of outlet guide vanes in low-pressure compressors is to redirect the incoming airflow axially. As climate, energy, and environmental goals push for greater efficiency, there is increasing pressure to enhance the performance of modern aeronautical engines, resulting in more extreme flow conditions. However, high flow turning often leads to increased losses and a higher risk of flow separation. Tandem blade designs offer a solution by enabling large flow deviations while helping to maintain flow attachment. This is achieved by making the boundary layer on the rear blade more resilient to separation. Despite these benefits, tandem blade configurations are subject to complex flow phenomena, including interactions between the wake of the front blade and the boundary layer on the suction side of the rear blade, laminar separation bubbles on the front blade, laminar-to-turbulent transition, as well as turbulent mixing and merging of the wakes. These effects significantly influence performance and pose challenges for standard RANS models. This paper investigates the performance of tandem blades using wall-resolved Large-Eddy Simulations (wrLES), offering a detailed comparison with RANS results. Specifically, we present wrLES of a low-pressure compressor tandem blade in a cascade configuration, employing a high-order discontinuous Galerkin method (DGM) to capture the complex flow dynamics.
The authors gracefully acknowledge the financial support of this work by the Walloon Region in Belgium through the Technological Innovation Partnership \"Walloon Innovations for Green Skies\" (WINGS, Contract No. 8441) The present research benefited from computational resources made available on Lucia, the Tier-1 supercomputer of the Walloon Region, infrastructure funded by the Walloon Region under the grant agreement n\u00B01910247.
Brach, Mathias. “Numerical investigation of a variable tandem outlet guide vane in a low pressure compressor cascade.” Master’s thesis, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique, Liège, Belgium. 2024. Available at https://matheo.uliege.be/handle/2268.2/20423.
Piomelli, Ugo and Balaras, Elias. “Wall-layer models for large-eddy simulations.” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics Vol. 34 (2008): pp. 349–374. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:14097816.
Georgiadis, Nicholas, Rizzetta, Donald and Fureby, Christer. “Large-Eddy Simulation: Current Capabilities, Recommended Practices, and Future Research.” AIAA Journal Vol. 48 (2010): pp. 1772–1784. DOI 10.2514/1.J050232.
Akolekar, Harshal D., Waschkowski, Fabian, Zhao, Yaomin, Pacciani, Roberto and Sandberg, Richard D. “Transition Modeling for Low Pressure Turbines Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Driven Machine Learning.” Energies Vol. 14 No. 15 (2021). DOI 10.3390/en14154680.
Wu, Jin-Long, Xiao, Heng and Paterson, Eric. “Physics-informed machine learning approach for augmenting turbulence models: A comprehensive framework.” Phys. Rev. Fluids Vol. 3 (2018): p. 074602. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevFlu-ids.3.074602.
Gorlé, C., Zeoli, S., Emory, M., Larsson, J. and Iaccarino, G. “Epistemic uncertainty quantification for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes modeling of separated flows over streamlined surfaces.” Physics of Fluids Vol. 31 No. 3 (2019): p. 035101. DOI 10.1063/1.5086341.
Konrath, Liesbeth and Peitsch, Dieter. “Impact of Tip Clearance Variation of Highly Loaded Tandem Blades in Axial Compressors.” Turbomachinery — Axial Flow Fan and Compressor Aerodynamics, Vol. 13A: p. V13AT29A016. 2023. DOI 10.1115/GT2023-101865.
Eckel, Jannik, Heinrich, Alexander, Janke, Christian, Ortmanns, Jens and Peitsch, Dieter. “3D Numerical and Experimental Investigation of High Turning Compressor Tandem Cascade.” 2016.
McGlumphy, Jonathan, Ng, Wing-Fai, Wellborn, Steven R. and Kempf, Severin. “Numerical Investigation of Tandem Airfoils for Subsonic Axial-Flow Compressor Blades.” Journal of Turbomachinery Vol. 131 No. 2 (2009): p. 021018. DOI 10.1115/1.2952366.
Schneider, Tim and Kožulović, Dragan. “Flow characteristics of axial compressor tandem cascades at large off-design incidence angles.” Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Vol. 55225: p. V06AT35A011. 2013. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Liu, Baojie, Zhang, Chuanhai, An, Guangfeng, Fu, Du and Yu, Xianjun. “Using tandem blades to break loading limit of highly loaded axial compressors.” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics Vol. 35 No. 4 (2022): pp. 165–175. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2021.07.031.
Cockburn, Bernardo, Karniadakis, George and Eds, Shu. Discontinuous Galerkin Methods: Theory, Computation and Application. Vol. 11 (2000). DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-59721-3.
Carton de Wiart, Corentin, Hillewaert, Koen, Bricteux, Laurent and Winckelmans, Gregoire. “Implicit LES of free and wall-bounded turbulent flows based on the discontinuous Galerkin/symmetric interior penalty method.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids Vol. 78 (2015). DOI 10.1002/fld.4021.
Rasquin, Michel, Thomas, Jean-François, Bechlars, Patrick, Franke, Matthias, Hillewaert, Koen et al. “Direct numerical simulations of airfoil cascades for the improvment of turbulence models through database generation.” ETC15-15th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid dynamics & Thermodynamics. 2023. DOI 10.29008/ETC2023-316.
de Wiart, C. C. and Hillewaert, K. Development and Validation of a Massively Parallel High-Order Solver for DNS and LES of Industrial Flows. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2015): pp. 251–292. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-12886-3_13. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12886-3_13.
Palacios, Francisco, Colonno, Michael, Aranake, Aniket, Campos, Alejandro, Copeland, Sean, Economon, Thomas, Lonkar, Amrita, Lukaczyk, Trent, Taylor, Thomas and Alonso, Juan. “Stanford University Unstructured (SU2): An open-source integrated computational environment for multi-physics simulation and design.” 2013. DOI 10.2514/6.2013-287.
Sainvitu, C., Iliopoulou, V. and Lepot, I. “Global optimization with expensive functions – Sample turbomachinery design application.” Recent Advances in Optimization and its Applications in Engineering (2010): pp. 499–509DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12598-0_44.
Pope, Stephen B. Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press (2000).
Geuzaine, Christophe and Remacle, Jean-François. “Gmsh: A 3-D Finite Element Mesh Generator with Built-in Pre- and Post-Processing Facilities.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering Vol. 79 (2009): pp. 1309 – 1331. DOI 10.1002/nme.2579.
Menter, Florian, Langtry, RB and Völker, S. “Transition Modelling for General Purpose CFD Codes.” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion Vol. 77 (2006): pp. 277–303. DOI 10.1007/s10494-006-9047-1.
Langtry, Robin B. and Menter, Florian R. “Correlation-Based Transition Modeling for Unstructured Parallelized Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes.” AIAA Journal Vol. 47 No. 12 (2009): pp. 2894–2906. DOI 10.2514/1.42362.
“NASA Langley Research Center Turbulence Modeling Resource.” https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/index.html. Accessed: 2024-12-13.
Menter, Florian, Kuntz, M. and Langtry, RB. “Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model.” Heat and Mass Transfer Vol. 4 (2003).
Rasquin, M, Bauer, A and Hillewaert, Koen. “Scientific post hoc and in situ visualisation of high-order polynomial solutions from massively parallel simulations.” International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics (2019).
Ovchinnikov, Victor, M., Choudhari Meelan and Piomelli, Ugo. “Numerical simulations of boundary-layer bypass transition due to high-amplitude free-stream turbulence.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics Vol. 613 (2008): p. 135–169. DOI 10.1017/S0022112008003017.
Wellinger, Philipp, Uhl, Philipp, Weigand, Bernhard and Rodriguez, Jose. “Analysis of turbulence structures and the validity of the linear Boussinesq hypothesis for an infinite tube bundle.” International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow Vol. 91 (2021): p. 108779. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2021.108779.
Lumley, John L. and Newman, Gary R. “The return to isotropy of homogeneous turbulence.” Journal of Fluid Mechanics Vol. 82 No. 1 (1977): p. 161–178. DOI 10.1017/S0022112077000585.
S. Banerjee, F. Durst, R. Krahl and Zenger, Ch. “Presentation of anisotropy properties of turbulence, invariants versus eigenvalue approaches.” Journal of Turbulence Vol. 8 (2007): p. N32. DOI 10.1080/14685240701506896. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/14685240701506896, URL https://doi.org/10.1080/14685240701506896.
Emory, Michael and Iaccarino, Gianluca. “Visualizing turbulence anisotropy in the spatial domain with componentality contours.” Center for Turbulence Research. Annual Research Briefs 2014. 2014. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:29497825.
Jofre, Lluís, Domino, Stefan P. and Iaccarino, Gianluca. “A Framework for Characterizing Structural Uncertainty in Large-Eddy Simulation Closures.” Flow, Turbulence and Combustion Vol. 100 (2018): pp. 341–363. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:125458935.
Iaccarino, Gianluca, Mishra, Aashwin and Ghili, Saman. “Eigenspace perturbations for uncertainty estimation of single-point turbulence closures.” Physical Review Fluids Vol. 2 (2017). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.024605.
Thompson, Roney, Mishra, Aashwin, Iaccarino, Gianluca, Edeling, Wouter and Sampaio, Luiz. “Eigenvector perturbation methodology for uncertainty quantification of turbulence models.” Physical Review Fluids Vol. 4 (2019). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.4.044603.
