Article (Scientific journals)
Evaluating the robustness of three ring-width measurement methods for growth release reconstruction
Maes, Sybryn L.; Vannoppen, Astrid; Altman, Jan et al.
2017In Dendrochronologia, 46, p. 67 - 76
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Maes S. L. et al._Evaluating the robustness of three ring-width_Dendrochronologia_PR2017.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.72 MB) Creative Commons License - Attribution, Non-Commercial
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Dendrochronology; Diffuse-porous; Disturbance reconstruction; Forest disturbance; Growth release; Historical ecology; Lintab; measuRing; Methodological evaluation; Ring-porous; Ring-width measurement; TRADER; XCT; Ecology; Plant Science
Abstract :
[en] Growth release analysis on tree rings can be used to validate forest disturbances from the known past or reconstruct those beyond the time line or resolution of documentary evidence. Differences in ring-width measurements may result in incorrect disturbance reconstruction. Yet, little is known about how growth release detection is influenced by the ring-width measurement method. Methodological comparisons mostly do not take into account the ultimate objective of the measurements nor their practicalities, such as time consumption or sample preparation. We assessed differences in ring-width measurements between three methods (Lintab, measuRing, and DHXCT), in a ring-porous (Quercus robur) and diffuse-porous (Fagus sylvatica) species, and evaluated whether detection of growth releases was consistent among methods We also comprehensively compared the methods, including quantitative and qualitative criteria. Growth releases were consistent among methods despite small, but significant differences in ring-width values. The apparent robustness of the methods suggests that they may be substitutable in future growth release studies, although the highlighted drawbacks and necessary improvements may advocate combined approaches. Furthermore, we propose an evaluation framework for quantitative and qualitative methodological decision-making and advocate the need for similar methodological comparisons within other fields of dendrochronology.
Disciplines :
Agriculture & agronomy
Environmental sciences & ecology
Phytobiology (plant sciences, forestry, mycology...)
Author, co-author :
Maes, Sybryn L.;  Forest & Nature Lab, Ghent University, Belgium
Vannoppen, Astrid;  University of Leuven, Division Forest, Nature and Landscape, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
Altman, Jan;  Institute of Botany of The Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic
Van den Bulcke, Jan;  UGCT-Woodlab-UGent, Ghent University, Laboratory of Wood Technology, Department of Forest and Water Management, Gent, Belgium
Decocq, Guillaume;  Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés (EDYSAN, FRE 3498 CNRS—UPJV), Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens Cédex, France
De Mil, Tom  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Gestion des ressources forestières ; UGCT-Woodlab-UGent, Ghent University, Laboratory of Wood Technology, Department of Forest and Water Management, Gent, Belgium
Depauw, Leen;  Forest & Nature Lab, Ghent University, Belgium
Landuyt, Dries;  Forest & Nature Lab, Ghent University, Belgium
Perring, Michael P.;  Forest & Nature Lab, Ghent University, Belgium ; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
Van Acker, Joris;  UGCT-Woodlab-UGent, Ghent University, Laboratory of Wood Technology, Department of Forest and Water Management, Gent, Belgium
Vanhellemont, Margot;  Forest & Nature Lab, Ghent University, Belgium
Verheyen, Kris;  Forest & Nature Lab, Ghent University, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Evaluating the robustness of three ring-width measurement methods for growth release reconstruction
Publication date :
December 2017
Journal title :
Dendrochronologia
ISSN :
1125-7865
eISSN :
1612-0051
Publisher :
Elsevier GmbH
Volume :
46
Pages :
67 - 76
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Tags :
ForestIsLife
Funders :
ERC - European Research Council
FWO - Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen
Funding text :
We thank the European Research Council [ERC Consolidator grant no. 614839 : PASTFORWARD] for funding SLM, LD, KV, DL and MP for scientific research and fieldwork involved in this study. AV was supported by FWO [grant no. G.0C96.14N ]. JA was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [grants no. 14-12262S and 17-07378S ] and the long-term research development project no. RVO 67985939. TDM was supported by the Special Research Fund [grant no. BOF.DOC.2014.0037.01 ] from the University of Ghent. MV and DL were funded as postdoctoral fellows by FWO-Vlaanderen . We thank Kris and Filip Ceunen, Haben Blondeel and Jorgen Op de Beeck for their support with the fieldwork in Sweden and France. We are also grateful to J\u00F6rg Brunet and Ulf Johansson (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences) for their help in site selection, fieldwork and compiling historical information in Sk\u00E5ne and similarly to D\u00E9borah Closset-Kopp, J\u00E9r\u00F4me Buridant and the Office National des For\u00EAts for their help in Lyons-La-For\u00EAt.
Available on ORBi :
since 10 October 2025

Statistics


Number of views
29 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
11 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
24
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
16
OpenCitations
 
18
OpenAlex citations
 
23

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi