Article (Scientific journals)
Comparative assessment of transplantation methods and donor sources for the restoration of Posidonia oceanica meadows.
Boulenger, Arnaud; Marengo, Michel; Boissery, Pierre et al.
2025In Science of the Total Environment, 1000, p. 180488
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Boulenger2025c.pdf
Publisher postprint (7.59 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Anchoring; Root system; Seagrass; Structural complexity; Survival; Anchorings; Posidonia oceanica; Root development; Seagrasses; Environmental Engineering
Abstract :
[en] The restoration of coastal ecosystems, especially seagrass meadows, has become a key priority to support the recovery of ecosystem services. In the Mediterranean Basin, although many projects have been carried out to restore Posidonia oceanica meadows over the past 50 years, major knowledge gaps persist. This study is the first to simultaneously compare two donor sources, storm fragments versus donor meadow cuttings, and three sustainable transplantation methods. This three-year experiment involved transplanting 693 cuttings using three distinct transplantation methods (iron staples, coconut fiber mats, and BESE elements) in shallow (20 m) and deep (28 m) dead matte areas of Calvi Bay (Corsica, NW Mediterranean). Performance was assessed through survival, shoot production, leaf and root morphological traits, with particular attention given to root systems development, a critical but often overlooked component in seagrass restoration studies. Storm-fragments performed comparably to donor meadow cuttings, supporting their use as a sustainable, non-destructive source of planting material. Among transplantation methods, iron staples led to the best performance across survival, root development, and cost-efficiency. BESE elements ensured high survival but limited root development, while coconut fiber mats performed poorly overall. Despite encouraging survival rates (>80 % under optimal conditions), significant differences in leaf and root traits remained between transplants and natural meadows after 36 months, suggesting incomplete ecological recovery. This comparative approach provides a critical first benchmark for evaluating the feasibility, performance, and economic viability of different restoration techniques in P. oceanica meadows.
Research Center/Unit :
FOCUS - Freshwater and OCeanic science Unit of reSearch - ULiège
Disciplines :
Aquatic sciences & oceanology
Phytobiology (plant sciences, forestry, mycology...)
Environmental sciences & ecology
Author, co-author :
Boulenger, Arnaud  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Freshwater and OCeanic science Unit of reSearch (FOCUS)
Marengo, Michel ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Evolution > Océanographie biologique ; STAtion de REcherche Sous-marines et Océanographiques (STARESO), 20260, Calvi, France
Boissery, Pierre;  Agence de l'Eau Rhône Méditerranée Corse, 2, street Henri Barbusse, CS 90464, 13207, Marseille Cedex 01, France
Gobert, Sylvie  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Evolution > Océanographie biologique
Language :
English
Title :
Comparative assessment of transplantation methods and donor sources for the restoration of Posidonia oceanica meadows.
Publication date :
13 September 2025
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment
ISSN :
0048-9697
eISSN :
1879-1026
Publisher :
Elsevier, Netherlands
Volume :
1000
Pages :
180488
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Development Goals :
14. Life below water
13. Climate action
Name of the research project :
REPAIR
Funding text :
This work was supported by the University of Liege (grant FSR2021) and the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique\u2014FNRS (grants ASP 40006932 and CDR J.0076.23). This study is part of the STARECAPMED (STAtion of Reference and rEsearch on Change of local and global Anthropogenic Pressures on Mediterranean Ecosystems Drifts) project funded by the Territorial Collectivity of Corsica and by the Rhone-Mediterranean and Corsican Water Agency. Authors are grateful to the STARESO for facilities and field assistance. Authors are grateful to Karin Didderen and Wouter Lengkeek from BESE Ecosystem Restoration (Culemborg, the Netherlands) for designing the experimental set-up and field assistance for transplantation. Moreover, the authors are grateful to the two reviewers for their valuable suggestions.
Available on ORBi :
since 06 October 2025

Statistics


Number of views
67 (4 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
107 (5 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
1
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
1

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi