The Waiting Room Questionnaire, a Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument Including Pictograms for Facilitating the Diagnosis of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders - 2025
The Waiting Room Questionnaire, a Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument Including Pictograms for Facilitating the Diagnosis of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
[en] Introduction: Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) are a heterogeneous group of chronic conditions without a known organic etiology, with a significant socioeconomic impact. In clinical practice, challenges remain in accurately assessing DGBI symptoms. Accurate interpretation and communication of the symptom pattern are imperative for a correct diagnosis. Hence, our group recently developed a Rome criteria-based Waiting Room Questionnaire (WRQ) with pictograms for visual support to improve symptom identification. This cross-sectional study aims to validate the WRQ for symptom assessment and DGBI diagnosis. Methods: In a tertiary care multicentric study, 245 ambulatory patients (71% female, 41 ± 19.4 years old) completed the WRQ. The clarity and added value were recorded by the patients. The concordance between diagnosis based on the WRQ most bothersome symptom and the expert clinician's diagnosis were compared. Results: Based on the expert opinion of clinicians, 53 patients were primarily diagnosed with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), 66 with postprandial distress syndrome (PDS), 36 with epigastric pain syndrome (EPS), 57 with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and 26 with chronic nausea/vomiting syndrome (CNVS). Pictograms entailed an added value according to 88% of the patients, and 95% of the patients understood all questions. Overall, patients' answers on the WRQ were highly reliable. Interrater agreement was substantial (Cohen's kappa = 0.72) with an overall concordance of 78% between expert opinion and the most bothersome symptom reported on the WRQ. Conclusion: The WRQ is a comprehensive and reliable tool facilitating the diagnosis of patients with DGBI.
The Waiting Room Questionnaire, a Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument Including Pictograms for Facilitating the Diagnosis of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
“Rome IV Diagnostic Criteria for FGIDs,” https://theromefoundation.org/rome-iv/rome-iv-criteria/.
A. D. Sperber, S. I. Bangdiwala, D. A. Drossman, et al., “Worldwide Prevalence and Burden of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Results of Rome Foundation Global Study,” Gastroenterology 160, no. 1 (2021): 99–114.
N. J. Talley, M. M. Walker, and G. Holtmann, “Functional Dyspepsia,” Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 32, no. 6 (2016): 467–473.
J. Tack, R. Bisschops, and G. Sarnelli, “Pathophysiology and Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia,” Gastroenterology 127 (2004): 1239–1255.
J. Tack, F. Carbone, L. Holvoet, H. Vanheel, T. Vanuytsel, and A. Vandenberghe, “The Use of Pictograms Improves Symptom Evaluation by Patients With Functional Dyspepsia,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 40, no. 5 (2014): 523–530.
J. Tack, N. J. Talley, M. Camilleri, et al., “Functional Gastroduodenal Disorders,” Gastroenterology 130, no. 5 (2006): 1466–1479.
F. Carbone, L. Holvoet, T. Vanuytsel, and J. Tack, “Rome III Functional Dyspepsia Symptoms Classification: Severity vs Frequency,” Neurogastroenterology and Motility 29, no. 6 (2017): 13024.
J. Tack, P. Caenepeel, J. Arts, K.-J. Lee, D. Sifrim, and J. Janssens, “Prevalence of Acid Reflux in Functional Dyspepsia and Its Association With Symptom Profile,” Gut 54, no. 10 (2005): 1370–1376.
D. A. Drossman, “Rome III Diagnostic Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders,” 2006.
C. J. Black, Y. Yiannakou, L. A. Houghton, and A. C. Ford, “Epidemiological, Clinical, and Psychological Characteristics of Individuals With Self-Reported Irritable Bowel Syndrome Based on the Rome IV vs Rome III Criteria,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 18, no. 2 (2020): 392–398.
O. S. Palsson, W. E. Whitehead, M. A. L. Van Tilburg, et al., “Development and Validation of the Rome IV Diagnostic Questionnaire for Adults,” Gastroenterology 150, no. 6 (2016): 1481–1491.
A. C. Ford, P. Bercik, D. G. Morgan, C. Bolino, M. I. Pintos–Sanchez, and P. Moayyedi, “Validation of the Rome III Criteria for the Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Secondary Care,” Gastroenterology 145, no. 6 (2013): 1262–1270.
