Article (Scientific journals)
Influence of virtual reality with or without hypnosis on patient-related experience and functional recovery in outpatient foot surgery with regional anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.
Carella, Michele; Bicego, Aminata Yasmina; Beck, Florian et al.
2025In Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, p. 2025-106678
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Manuscript_VRH.foot_revised2.docx
Author postprint (107.03 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Ambulatory Care; Analgesia; Anxiety; Lower Extremity; Orthopedic Surgery
Abstract :
[en] [en] INTRODUCTION: Perioperative psychological stress significantly influences recovery after surgery. Sciatic nerve and ankle blocks are commonly used techniques for achieving postoperative analgesia in outpatient foot surgery. However, these procedures can cause discomfort for patients, potentially affecting their postoperative functional recovery. This study aims to assess the impact of virtual reality with or without hypnosis on patient satisfaction and postoperative functional recovery in patients undergoing peripheral nerve blocks for outpatient foot surgery. METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted involving 57 patients scheduled for outpatient foot surgery with combined sciatic popliteal and ankle nerve blocks. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group C (usual care with intravenous midazolam), group VR (virtual reality immersion through glasses and headsets), or group VRH (virtual reality immersion with prerecorded hypnosis-sedation session). Patient satisfaction with the regional anesthesia experience (evaluated using the EVAN-LR score, Evaluation du Vécu de l'Anesthésie LocoRégionale Score) was assessed 4 hours after surgery. The quality of recovery 15-item and perioperative anxiety (Numeric Rate Scale (NRS) and six-item Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6)) were evaluated at fixed time points: 1 hour before and after surgery for NRS-anxiety and STAI-6 and 1 day before surgery, and at day 1 and day 3 postoperatively for Quality-of-Recovery-15 items. RESULTS: Postoperative EVAN-LR scores were similar across groups (group C: 91 (86.5, 93.5) vs group VR: 90 (87.5, 93.5) vs group VRH: 91 (89, 93); p=0.64). There were no significant differences in the evolution of quality of recovery 15-item (p=0.25) nor perioperative anxiety (NRS and STAI-6: p=0.18 and p=0.14, respectively) among the groups. DISCUSSION: Virtual reality with or without hypnosis did not significantly impact satisfaction with regional anesthesia techniques in outpatient foot surgery. Additionally, there were no differences observed among the groups in terms of functional recovery during the first three postoperative days. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05558449.
Disciplines :
Anesthesia & intensive care
Author, co-author :
Carella, Michele  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service d'anesthésie - réanimation
Bicego, Aminata Yasmina  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA Neurosciences - Conscious Care Lab ; Cognitive Psychology Unit, Social Sciences Faculty, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
Beck, Florian  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA
Malta, Coraline ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Bloc opératoire - chirurgie de l'appareil locomoteur (+1BC)
Ardizzone, Lorris ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > > Service d'anesthésie - réanimation
Bonhomme, Vincent  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Anesthésie et réanimation
Vanhaudenhuyse, Audrey  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques
Language :
English
Title :
Influence of virtual reality with or without hypnosis on patient-related experience and functional recovery in outpatient foot surgery with regional anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.
Publication date :
22 June 2025
Journal title :
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
ISSN :
1098-7339
eISSN :
1532-8651
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, England
Pages :
rapm-2025-106678
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
ULiège - Université de Liège
Leon Fredericq Foundation
FERB - Fondazione Europea Ricerca Biomedica
EU - European Union
AstraZeneca
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine
Stichting Tegen Kanker
Funding text :
This work was supported by the University and University Hospital of Liege and its Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine and Algology Interdisciplinary Centre, AstraZeneca foundation, the Leon Fredericq Foundation, the Belgium Foundation Against Cancer (grant numbers: C/2020/1357 and 2023/081), and the European Foundation of Biomedical Research FERB Onlus and Wallonia as part of a 474 program of the BioWin Health Cluster framework. AB is funded by an EU Marie Curie postdoctoral grant ‘Hynpodelic’. Sponsors had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation, nor in the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit the paper for publication. The authors take full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the study.
Available on ORBi :
since 26 July 2025

Statistics


Number of views
108 (5 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
44 (3 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
1
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
1

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi