Budget impact analysis of cenobamate, a novel adjunctive therapy for the treatment of drug resistant focal onset seizures, from the Belgian healthcare payer perspective.
Budget impact analysis of cenobamate a novel adjunctive therapy for the treatment of drug resistant focal onset seizures from the Belgian healthcare.pdf
Belgium; Epilepsy; H51; I10; budget impact; cenobamate; health economics
Abstract :
[en] [en] OBJECTIVE: Cenobamate has recently been introduced as new anti-seizure medication (ASM) for patients with focal onset seizures (FOS) who are insufficiently controlled despite the use of three previous ASMs. To date, few evaluations have addressed the budgetary impact for the healthcare payer of add-on ASMs in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This study aims to assess the budgetary implications for the Belgian health insurer, the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI), if cenobamate were reimbursed for the adjuvant treatment of FOS in adults with DRE.
METHODS: A prevalence-based budget impact model (BIM) was developed from the perspective of the Belgian NIHDI, considering all direct healthcare costs over a three-year time horizon. A standardized expert elicitation process with experienced epileptologists was conducted to collect data on Belgian clinical practice. Source data uncertainty impact was investigated through a one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA).
RESULTS: Over a three-year period, considering the cumulative drug costs of cenobamate, replacement of other third-generation ASMs, and savings generated at medical cost level, the introduction of cenobamate as adjunctive treatment for the target population was estimated to reduce the NIHDI budget by -€8 105 616. The robustness of these savings was confirmed through an OWSA.
CONCLUSION: The savings at medical cost level fully offset the impact of cenobamate on the drug budget, leading to an overall healthcare budget saving of -€8 105 616 for NIHDI. This favourable outcome is largely due to cenobamate's high efficacy reflected in its high response rate and significant effect on reducing seizure frequency.
Disciplines :
Neurology Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
Vonck, Kristl ; Department Neurology - 4Brain, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
Bodart, Olivier ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Neurologie
Weckhuysen, Sarah; Neurology Department, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Tanghe, Ann; Hict NV, Ghent, Belgium
Callebaut, Britt; Hict NV, Ghent, Belgium
Verdonck, Caroline; Hict NV, Ghent, Belgium
Van den Bergh, Lynn; Angelini Pharma, Paris, France
Legros, Benjamin ; Neurology Department, HUB-Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Budget impact analysis of cenobamate, a novel adjunctive therapy for the treatment of drug resistant focal onset seizures, from the Belgian healthcare payer perspective.
Sciensano. Gezondheid en kwaliteit van leven–Samenvatting van de resultaten gezonheidsenquete 2018. 2018.
Hauser WA, Annegers JF, Kurland LT., Incidence of epilepsy and unprovoked seizures in Rochester, Minnesota: 1935-1984. Epilepsia. 1993;34(3):453–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1993.tb02586.x.
Hict. Expert opinion report–clinical practice of focal onset seizures in Belgium. Ghent (Belgium); 2021.
Leppik I, De Rue K, Edrich P, et al.Measurement of seizure freedom in adjunctive therapy studies in refractory partial epilepsy: the levetiracetam experience. Epileptic Disorders. 2006;8(2):118–130. doi: 10.1684/j.1950-6945.2006.tb00170.x.
Li N, Majoie M, Evers S, et al.Budget impact analysis of cenobamate for epilepsy patients with drug-resistant focal onset seizures in The Netherlands. J Med Econ. 2025;28(1):114–123. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2443338.
Neyt M, Thiry N, Cleemput I., Method. In: Belgian guidelines for economic evaluations and budget impact analyses: third edition. Brussels (Belgium): Belgian Healthare Knowledge Centre (KCE); 2025. KCE Report 400.
Mauskopf JA, Sullivan SD, Annemans L, et al.Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices-budget impact analysis. Value Health. 2007;10(5):336–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00187.x.
StatBel. Bevolkingsvooruitzichten (1992–2070) [Online]. [cited 2021]. Available from: https://statbel.fgov.be/nl/themas/bevolking/bevolkingsvooruitzichten#panel-13
StatBel. Structure of the population [Online]. 2020 [cited 2021]. Available from: https://statbel.fgov.be/en/themes/population/structure-population
Simoens S., Budget impact analysis of adjunctive therapy with lacosamide for partial-onset epileptic seizures in Belgium. J Med Econ. 2011;14(3):299–304. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.577852.
Schiller Y, Najjar Y., Quantifying the response to anti-epileptic drugs: effect of past treatment history. Neurology. 2008;70(1):54–65. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000286959.22040.6e.
Boon P, Ferrao Santos S, Jansen AC, et al.Recommendations for the treatment of epilepsy in adult and pediatric patients in Belgium: 2020 update. Acta Neurol Belg. 2021;121(1):241–257. doi: 10.1007/s13760-020-01488-y.
For a Healthy Belgium. Mortality and causes of death [Online]. [cited 2021]. Available from: https://www.healthybelgium.be/en/health-status/mortality-and-causes-of-death
IQVIA. Sales Data Belgium December 2022; 2023.
Laskier V, Agyei- Kyeremateng K, Eddy A, et al.Cost-effectiveness of cenobamate for focal seizures in people with drug-resistant epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2023;64(4):843–856. doi: 10.1111/epi.17506.
Arvelle Therapeutics UK Biostats team. Data on file–NCT01866111.
National Institute for Health and Care (NICE). Evidence review NICE guideline NG217 [Online]. NICE; 2022. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng217/evidence/f-addon-therapy-for-generalised-tonicclonic-and-focal-onset-seizures-pdf-398366282815
Krauss GL, Klein P, Brandt C, et al.Safety and efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate (YKP3089) in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-response trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(1):38–48. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30399-0.
National Institute for Health and Care (NICE). Epilepsies in children, young people–add-on therapy for generalised tonic-clonic–NICE guideline NG217 [Online]. NICE; 2022. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng217/resources/epilepsies-in-children-young-people-and-adults-pdf-66143780239813
Paoletti M, Ragonese A, Budassi L, et al.Cost-effectiveness of cenobamate as a therapeutic alternative for the treatment of focal epilepsy in adults with inadequate seizure control. Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2025;12(1):118–129. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2025.3341.
EMA. Product information–epar cenobamate [Online]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/vimpat-epar-product-information_en.pdf
EMA. Product information–epar brivaracetam [Online]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/community-register/2016/20160114133756/anx_133756_en.pdf
Sperling M, Klein P, Aboumatar S, et al.Cenobamate (YKP3089) as adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled focal seizures in a large, phase 3, multicenter, open-label safety study. Epilepsia. 2020;61(6):1099–1108. doi: 10.1111/epi.16525.
WHO. WHO–ATC/DDD Index (N03A antiepileptics) [Online]. [cited 2021 Mar]. Available from: https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/
EMA. Product information–epar lacosamide [Online]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/vimpat-epar-product-information_en.pdf
EMA. Product information–epar–perampanel [Online]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/fycompa-epar-product-information_en.pdf
Campone M, Yang H, Faust E, et al.Cost of adverse events during treatment with everolimus plus exemestane or single-agent chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer in Western Europe. J Med Econ. 2014;17(12):837–845. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.959589.
Technische Cel voor de verwerking van de gegevens (TCT). Nationale Databank Medische Diagnose/Zorg & Kost [Online]. [cited 2021 Mar]. Available from https://tct.fgov.be/webetct/etct-web/html/nl/index.jsp
Ángel Calleja M, Navarro A, Serratosa JM, et al.Determination of the economically justifiable price of cenobamate in the treatment of focal-onset seizures in adult patients with drug resistant epilepsy in Spain. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022;22(7):1127–1136. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2022.2107507.
Stern S, Wade C, Schabert V, et al.PND11 The budget impact of cenobamate for the treatment of uncontrolled focal epilepsy. Value Health. 2021;24(1):S160. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.04.795.
Privitera M, Richy F, Schabert V., Indirect treatment comparison of cenobamate to other ASMs for the treatment of uncontrolled focal seizures. Epilepsy Behav. 2022;126:108429. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108429.
Lattanzi S, Trinka E, Zaccara G, et al.Third-generation antiseizure medications for adjunctive treatment. Drugs. 2022;82(2):199–218. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01661-4.
Mulheron S, Leahy T, McStravick M, et al.A comparison of cenobamate with other newer antiseizure medications for adjunctive treatment of focal-onset seizures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Seizure. 2024;118:80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2024.04.004.
Thieffry S, Klein P, Baulac M, et al.Understanding the challenge of comparative effectiveness research in focal epilepsy: a review of network meta-analyses and real-world evidence on antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia. 2020;61(4):595–609. doi: 10.1111/epi.16476.
National Institute for Health and Care (NICE). Technology appraisal guidance [TA753]: cenobamate for treating focal onset seizures in epilepsy [Online]. NICE; 2021. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta753/resources/cenobamate-for-treating-focal-onset-seizures-in-epilepsy-pdf-82611373757893
Pietrafusa N, Falcicchio G, Russo E, et al.Cenobamate as add-on therapy for drug resistant epilepsies: effectiveness, drug to drug interactions and neuropsychological impact. What have we learned from real word evidence?Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1239152. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1239152.
Lasek-Bal A, Kściuk B, Zieliński T, et al.Long-term cenobamate retention, efficacy, and safety: outcomes from Expanded Access Programme. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2023;57(6):492–496. doi: 10.5603/pjnns.97121.
Lauxmann S, Heuer D, Heckelmann J, et al.Cenobamate: real-world data from a retrospective multicenter study. J Neurol. 2024;271(10):6596–6604. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12510-1.
Strzelczyk A, von Podewils F, Hamer HM, et al.Post-marketing experience with cenobamate in the treatment of focal epilepsies: a multicenter cohort study. CNS Drugs. 2025;39(3):321–331. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01158-8.
Peña-Ceballos J, Moloney P, Munteanu T, et al.Adjunctive cenobamate in highly active and ultra-refractory focal epilepsy: a “real-world” retrospective study. Epilepsia. 2023;64(5):1225–1235. doi: 10.1111/epi.17549.
Medlinskiene D, Tomlinson J, Marques J, et al.Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of new medicines into clinical practice: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1198. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07196-4.
WHO. WHO–ATC/DDD Index–N03AX22 [Online]. Available from: https://atcddd.fhi.no/atc_ddd_index/?code=N03AX22
WHO. WHO–ATC/DDD Index–N03AX23 [Online]. Available from: https://atcddd.fhi.no/atc_ddd_index/?code=N03AX23.
WHO. WHO–ATC/DDD Index–N03AX18 [Online]. Available from: https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/?code=N03AX18