Article (Scientific journals)
The pros and cons of axenic cultures in cyanobacterial research
Dextro, Rafael B.; Andreote, Ana P.D.; Vaz, Marcelo et al.
2024In Algal Research, 78, p. 103415
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
1-s2.0-S2211926424000274-main.pdf
Publisher postprint (2.08 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Axenicity; Co-cultivation; Cyanosphere; Metabolic network; Purification methods; Agronomy and Crop Science
Abstract :
[en] An ongoing issue among cyanobacteriologists is the sometimes-mandatory obligation of working with axenic cultures. Proponents of axenicity argue that it is the safest way to determine the true producer of a particular compound, as a contaminant-free pure culture possesses only the targeted strain's genetic material. For biotechnological applications, axenicity allows the produced biomass to be used in valuable and high-end purposes, such as pharmaceutics, agriculture, cosmetic and food sectors. Nevertheless, axenic cultures are expensive and hard to obtain, requiring constant surveillance. Some strains are described as recalcitrant to axenicity, dying off or ceasing the biosynthesis of some compounds. Axenic culturing greatly deviates from natural conditions, which may alter gene expression and fail to embody ecological relationships. In non-axenic cultures, a complex interaction network among microorganisms exists, with shared metabolic pathways generating biochemical diversity that allows strains to survive stress and laboratory conditions. On the other hand, a non-axenic condition may limit the final use of the biomass produced, as unknown contaminants might be present. Additionally, depending on the ecological interaction established, competition between different microorganisms can negatively influence the growth of the targeted population. This review discusses axenicity in cyanobacterial research and the feasibility of performing high-quality scientific research without axenic cultures, presenting both culturing approaches and shedding light on the intricate nature of microbial interactions.
Disciplines :
Biochemistry, biophysics & molecular biology
Author, co-author :
Dextro, Rafael B.;  University of São Paulo (USP), Centre for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture (CENA), Piracicaba, Brazil
Andreote, Ana P.D.;  University of São Paulo (USP), Centre for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture (CENA), Piracicaba, Brazil
Vaz, Marcelo ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la vie > Centre d'Ingénierie des Protéines (CIP)
Carvalho, Carolinne R.;  University of São Paulo (USP), Centre for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture (CENA), Piracicaba, Brazil ; College of Agriculture ‘Luiz de Queiroz’ (ESALQ), University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil
Fiore, Marli F.;  University of São Paulo (USP), Centre for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture (CENA), Piracicaba, Brazil
Language :
English
Title :
The pros and cons of axenic cultures in cyanobacterial research
Publication date :
2024
Journal title :
Algal Research
ISSN :
2211-9264
Publisher :
Elsevier
Volume :
78
Pages :
103415
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
BELSPO - Belgian Federal Science Policy Office
CNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
FAPESP - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Funding text :
Grants from the State of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, 2016/14227-5 ) and Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, 433166/2018-5 ) supported this research. R.B.D. received funding from the Brazilian Federal Agency for the Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES, Finance Code 001 ) and a doctoral scholarship from CNPq (140892/2020-6). M.G.M.V.V. thanks the Belgian Science Policy Office that is supporting the BCCM/ULC collection. M.F.F. received a research fellowship (306803/2018-6) from CNPq.Grants from the State of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, 2016/14227-5) and Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, 433166/2018-5) supported this research. R.B.D. received funding from the Brazilian Federal Agency for the Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES, Finance Code 001) and a doctoral scholarship from CNPq (140892/2020-6). M.G.M.V.V. thanks the Belgian Science Policy Office that is supporting the BCCM/ULC collection. M.F.F. received a research fellowship (306803/2018-6) from CNPq.
Available on ORBi :
since 22 May 2025

Statistics


Number of views
40 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
5
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
4
OpenCitations
 
3
OpenAlex citations
 
7

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi