Article (Scientific journals)
Meta-analysis on resected pancreatic cancer: a comparison between adjuvant treatments and gemcitabine alone.
Chen, Hua; He, Ruizhi; Shi, Xiuhui et al.
2018In BMC Cancer, 18 (1), p. 1034
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
2018_BMC Cancer.pdf
Author postprint (1.3 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Chemotherapy; Gemcitabine; Meta-analysis; Pancreatic cancer; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Deoxycytidine; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives; Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy; Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality; Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology; Pancreatic Neoplasms/physiopathology; Progression-Free Survival; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Oncology; Genetics; Cancer Research
Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy such as gemcitabine is still an important treatment. Gemcitabine (Gem) may prolong survival time and delay the development of recurrent disease after complete resection of pancreatic cancer. Currently, some control studies have been performed between certain drugs and gemcitabine monotherapy after pancreatic cancer surgery, but the outcomes were uncertain. Here, we implemented meta-analysis to compare the efficacy between adjuvant treatments and gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and the Central Registry of Controlled Trials of the Cochrane Library searches were undertaken to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Date of search ranged from January 1997 to December 2017. The meta-analysis included six RCTs. The major endpoints involved overall survival (OS), disease-free survival/progress free survival/relapse-free survival (DFS/PFS/RFS) and grade 3-4 toxicity. RESULTS: Pooled meta-analytic estimates were derived using random-effects model. Subgroup analysis used fixed-effects model. The outcome showed that there was no difference in OS (hazard ratio (HR), 0.87; 95% CI, 0.70-1.07; P = 0.19) and DFS (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-1.02; P = 0.08) between the adjuvant treatments group (fluorouracil+folinic acid, S-1, gemcitabine+capecitabine, gemcitabine+erlotinib and gemcitabine+uracil/tegafur) and Gem monotherapy group. However, the subgroup analysis showed that only S-1 chemotherapy, which is an oral fluoropyrimidine agent containing tegafur, gimeracil and oteracil, was significant in OS (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.74; P < 0.0001) and DFS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.75; P < 0.00001) compared with Gem alone. Toxicity analysis showed there was an increased incidence of grade 3/4 diarrhea (risk ratio (RR), 5.11; 95%CI, 3.24-8.05; P < 0.00001) and decreased incidence of grade 3/4 leucopenia (RR, 0.55; 95%CI, 0.31-0.98; P = 0.04), thrombocytopenia (RR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.39-0.97; P = 0.04) in adjuvant treatments group. Neutropenia (RR, 0.69; 95%CI, 0.36-1.29; P = 0.24) and fatigue (RR, 1.29; 95%CI, 0.95-1.77; P = 0.11) for patients between the two groups were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In our meta-analysis, a significant survival benefit is only observed in the S-1 regimen, but the results are yet to be determined. Optimal cytotoxicity or targeted drug regimens need further validation in clinical trials in the future.
Disciplines :
Oncology
Author, co-author :
Chen, Hua;  Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
He, Ruizhi;  Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
Shi, Xiuhui ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de pharmacie ; Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
Zhou, Min;  Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
Zhao, Chunle;  Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
Zhang, Hang;  Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. 172356995@qq.com
Qin, Renyi;  Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. ryqin@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn
Language :
English
Title :
Meta-analysis on resected pancreatic cancer: a comparison between adjuvant treatments and gemcitabine alone.
Publication date :
23 October 2018
Journal title :
BMC Cancer
eISSN :
1471-2407
Publisher :
BioMed Central Ltd, England
Volume :
18
Issue :
1
Pages :
1034
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 16 April 2025

Statistics


Number of views
24 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
11 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
5
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
5
OpenCitations
 
7
OpenAlex citations
 
8

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi