[en] With the incorporation of effective therapies for myelofibrosis (MF), accurately predicting outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is crucial for determining the optimal timing for this procedure. Using data from 5,183 MF patients who underwent first allo-HCT between 2005 and 2020 at EBMT centers, we examined different machine learning (ML) models to predict overall survival (OS) after transplant. The cohort was divided into a training set (75%) and a test set (25%) for model validation. A Random Survival Forests (RSF) model was developed based on 10 variables: patient age, comorbidity index, performance status, blood blasts, hemoglobin, leukocytes, platelets, donor type, conditioning intensity, and graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Its performance was compared with a four-level Cox regression-based score and other ML-based models derived from the same dataset, and with the CIBMTR score. The RSF outperformed all comparators, achieving better concordance indices across both primary and post-essential thrombocythemia/polycythemia vera MF subgroups. The robustness and generalizability of the RSF model was confirmed by Akaike's Information Criterion and time-dependent Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) metrics in both sets. While all models were prognostic for non-relapse mortality, the RSF provided better curve separation, effectively identifying a high-risk group comprising 25% of patients. In conclusion, ML enhances risk stratification in MF patients undergoing allo-HCT, paving the way for personalized medicine. A web application (https://gemfin.click/ebmt) based on the RSF model offers a practical tool to identify patients at high risk for poor transplantation outcomes, supporting informed treatment decisions and advancing individualized care.
Disciplines :
Hematology
Author, co-author :
Hernandez-Boluda, Juan Carlos ; Hospital Clínico Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Mosquera Orgueira, Adrian ; University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA, Spain
Gras, Luuk; EBMT Statistical Unit, Leiden, Netherlands
Koster, Linda; EBMT Data Office, Leiden, Netherlands
Tuffnell, Joe; EBMT Leiden Study Unit, Leiden, Netherlands
Kröger, Nicolaus ; University Medical Center Hamburg_Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Gambella, Massimiliano; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
Schroeder, Thomas; University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
Robin, Marie ; Hopital Saint Louis, Paris, France
Sockel, Katja; University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Passweg, Jakob R ; University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Blau, Igor Wolfgang; Charité, Berlin, Germany
Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim ; Cellular therapy unit, Lille, France
Van Dijck, Ruben ; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Stelljes, Matthias ; University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
Sengeloev, Henrik; Rigshospitalet
Vydra, Jan ; Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Prague, Czech Republic
Platzbecker, Uwe ; University Hospital Leipzig, Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Leipzig, Germany
Passamonti, F, Mora, B, Myelofibrosis. Blood 141:16 (2023), 1954–1970.
Tefferi, A, Primary myelofibrosis: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 98:5 (2023), 801–821.
Kröger, N, Bacigalupo, A, Barbui, T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol 11:1 (2024), e62–e74.
Vachhani, P, Verstovsek, S, Bose, P, Disease modification in myelofibrosis: an elusive goal?. J Clin Oncol 40:11 (2022), 1147–1154.
England, J, Gupta, V, Novel therapies vs hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: who, when, how?. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2021:1 (2021), 453–462.
Maze, D, Arcasoy, MO, Henrie, R, et al. Upfront allogeneic transplantation versus JAK inhibitor therapy for patients with myelofibrosis: a North American collaborative study [published correction appears in Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024;59(2):196-202]. Bone Marrow Transpl 59:2 (2024), 196–202.
Gagelmann, N, Ditschkowski, M, Bogdanov, R, et al. Comprehensive clinical-molecular transplant scoring system for myelofibrosis undergoing stem cell transplantation. Blood 133:20 (2019), 2233–2242.
Tamari, R, McLornan, DP, Ahn, KW, et al. A simple prognostic system in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a CIBMTR/EBMT analysis. Blood Adv 7:15 (2023), 3993–4002.
McLornan, D, Eikema, DJ, Czerw, T, et al. Trends in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in Europe between 1995 and 2018: a CMWP of EBMT retrospective analysis. Bone Marrow Transpl 56:9 (2021), 2160–2172.
Hernández-Boluda, JC, Pereira, A, Alvarez-Larran, A, et al. Predicting survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: performance of the myelofibrosis transplant scoring system (MTSS) and development of a new prognostic model. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 26:12 (2020), 2237–2244.
Mosquera-Orgueira, A, Pérez-Encinas, M, Hernández-Sánchez, A, et al. Machine learning improves risk stratification in myelofibrosis: an analysis of the Spanish Registry of Myelofibrosis. Hemasphere, 7(1), 2023, e818.
Mosquera-Orgueira, A, Arellano-Rodrigo, E, Garrote, M, et al. Integrating AIPSS-MF and molecular predictors: a comparative analysis of prognostic models for myelofibrosis. Hemasphere, 8(3), 2024, e60.
Bacigalupo, A, Ballen, K, Rizzo, D, et al. Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 15:12 (2009), 1628–1633.
Hernández-Boluda, JC, Pereira, A, Kröger, N, et al. Determinants of survival in myelofibrosis patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Leukemia 35:1 (2021), 215–224.
Polverelli, N, Bonneville, EF, de Wreede, LC, et al. Impact of comorbidities and body mass index on the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: a study on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT. Am J Hematol 99:5 (2024), 993–996.
Copelan, E, Casper, JT, Carter, SL, et al. A scheme for defining cause of death and its application in the T cell depletion trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 13:12 (2007), 1469–1476.
Fine, JP, Gray, RJ, A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 94:446 (1999), 496–509.
R Foundation. The R Project for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/. (Accessed 23 April 2024)
Therneau, TM, Lumley, T, Elizabeth, A, Cynthia, C, A package for survival analysis in R. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival. (Accessed 23 April 2024)
Gerds, TA, prodlim: product-limit estimation for censored event history analysis. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=prodlim. (Accessed 23 April 2024)
Gray, B, cmprsk: subdistribution analysis of competing risks. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cmprsk. (Accessed 23 April 2024)
Ishwaran, H, Kogalur, UB, Blackstone, EH, Lauer, MS, Random survival forests. Ann Appl Stat 2:3 (2008), 841–860.
Jaeger, BC, Long, DL, Long, DM, et al. Oblique random survival forests. Ann Appl Stat 13:3 (2019), 1847–1883.
Chen, T, Guestrin, C, XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, Association for Computing Machinery, 785–794.
Chen, Bingshu E, A package of deep neural network tools for probability models. Accessed 1 May 2024 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dnn.
Harrell, FE Jr, Lee, KL, Mark, DB, Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:4 (1996), 361–387.
Blanche, P, Dartigues, JF, Jacqmin-Gadda, H, Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks. Stat Med 32:30 (2013), 5381–5397.
Akaike, H, A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 19:6 (1974), 716–723.
Wal, WMvd, Geskus, RB, ipw: an R package for inverse probability weighting. J Stat Softw 43:13 (2011), 1–23.
Kröger, N, Wolschke, C, Gagelmann, N, How I treat transplant-eligible patients with myelofibrosis. Blood 142:20 (2023), 1683–1696.
Mussetti, A, Rius-Sansalvador, B, Moreno, V, et al. Artificial intelligence methods to estimate overall mortality and non-relapse mortality following allogeneic HCT in the modern era: an EBMT-TCWP study. Bone Marrow Transpl 59:2 (2024), 232–238.
Kröger, N, Panagiota, V, Badbaran, A, et al. Impact of molecular genetics on outcome in myelofibrosis patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 23:7 (2017), 1095–1101.
Ali, H, Aldoss, I, Yang, D, et al. MIPSS70+ v2.0 predicts long-term survival in myelofibrosis after allogeneic HCT with the Flu/Mel conditioning regimen. Blood Adv 3:1 (2019), 83–95.
Tamari, R, Rapaport, F, Zhang, N, et al. Impact of high-molecular-risk mutations on transplantation outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 25:6 (2019), 1142–1151.