[en] In low permeability environments, transport by advection is often neglected based on a Peclet number criterion. Such a criterion usually states that if the Peclet number (Pe) is much smaller than 1, diffusion dominates over advection and transport may be modeled considering diffusion only. Unfortunately, up to 10 different Peclet number definitions exist and for a particular case these different definitions lead to very diverse Peclet number values, differing several orders of magnitude from each other. In this paper, the different Peclet number definitions are therefore evaluated on their ability to determine the relative importance of transport by advection and by diffusion in low permeability environments. This is done by comparing the results of the analytical solution for pure diffusion with the analytical solution for diffusion, advection and dispersion for a large number of different input parameter values. The relation between the different Peclet numbers and the difference between the calculated concentration considering diffusion only and the calculated concentration considering both diffusion and advection is studied. These calculations show that some Peclet number definitions are not well suited to decide whether advection may be neglected in low permeability media.
Research Center/Unit :
Aquapôle - ULiège
Disciplines :
Geological, petroleum & mining engineering
Author, co-author :
Huysmans, Marijke; Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - KUL > Geologie-Geografie > Hydrogeologie en Ingenieursgeologie
Dassargues, Alain ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département Argenco : Secteur GEO3 > Hydrogéologie & Géologie de l'environnement
Language :
English
Title :
Review of the use of Peclet numbers to determine the relative importance of advection and diffusion in low permeability environments
Aertsens M, Put M and Dierckx A (2003) An analytical model for the interpretation of pulse injection experiments performed for testing the spatial variability of clay formations. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 61: 423-436 10.1016/S0169-7722(02)00118-3
Bear J and Verruijt A (1994) Modeling groundwater flow and pollution, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
Boisson J-Y, Bertrand L, Heitz J-F and Moureau-Le Golvan Y (2001) In situ and laboratory investigations of fluid flow through an argillaceous formation at different scales of space and time, Tournemire tunnel, southern France. Hydrogeology Journal 9 108-123 10.1007/s100400000119
Castany G (1967) Traité pratique des eaux souterraines: 2nd edition, Dunod, Paris
de Marsily G (1986) Quantitative hydrogeology: Groundwater hydrology for engineers, Academic press, Inc., San Diego, California
Fetter CW (1999) Contaminant hydrogeology, Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Fetter CW (2001) Applied hydrogeology, Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Freeze RA and Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater, Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Garges JA and Baehr AL (1998) Type curves to determine the relative importance of advection and dispersion for solute and vapor transport. Ground Water 36 959-965 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXntl2rurY%3D
Hendry MJ and Wassenaar LI (1999) Implications of the distribution of δD in pore waters for groundwater flow and the timing of geologic events in a thick aquitard system. Water Resources Research 35 1751-1760 10.1029/1999WR900046
Horseman ST, Higgo JJW, Alexander J and J.F. H (1996) Water, Gas and Solute Movement Through Argillaceous Media, Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
Keller CK, van der Kamp G and Cherry JA (1989) A multiscale study of the permeability of a thick clayey till. Water Resources Research 25 2299-2317
Mallants D, Marivoet J and Sillen X (2001) Performance assessment of the disposal of vitrified high-level waste in a clay layer. Journal of Nuclear Materials 298 125-135 10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00577-3
Neuzil CE (1986) Groundwater flow in low-permeability environments. Water Resources Research 22 1163-1195
Ogata A and Banks RB (1961) A solution of the differential equation of longitudinal dispersion in porous media, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 411-A
ONDRAF/NIRAS (2002) Safety Assessment and Feasibility Interim Report 2 - SAFIR 2, NIROND 2001-06 E
Remenda VH, van der Kamp G and Cherry JA (1996) Use of vertical profiles of d18O to constrain estimates of hydraulic conductivity in a thick, unfractured aquitard. Water Resources Research 32 2979-2987 10.1029/ 96WR01778
Sauty J-P (1980) An analysis of hydrodispersive transfer in aquifers. Water Resources Research 16 145-158
Soler JM (2001)The effect of coupled transport phenomena in the Opalinus Clay and implications for radionuclide transport, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 53 63-84 10.1016/S0169-7722(01)00140-1
Spitz K and Moreno J (1996) A practical guide to groundwater and solute transport modeling, John Wiley and Sons, New York
van der Kamp G, Van Stempvoort DR and Wassenaar LI (1996) The radial diffusion method 1. Using intact cores to determine isotopic composition, chemistry and effective porosities for groundwater in aquitards. Water Resources Research 32 1815-1822 10.1029/95WR03719
Wemaere I, Marivoet J, Labat S, Beaufays R and Maes T (2002) Mol-1 borehole (April-May 1997): Core manipulations and determination of hydraulic conductivities in the laboratory (R-3590), SCK-CEN, Mol, Belgium
Wilson JL, Li C-H and Hofmann P (1993) Laboratory validation of new mathematical models of groundwater pollution transport phenomena, Technical completion report WERC 01423143, Sorcorro, New Mexico
Zheng C and Bennet GD (2002) Applied contaminant transport modeling: second edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York