Article (Scientific journals)
External validation of the MidiCAT variant of thrombography: Comparison with calibrated automated thrombography and study of the centrifugation scheme.
Charles, Sébastien; Guyotat, Denis; Fontana, Pierre et al.
2022In Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 9, p. 998687
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Charles et al. - 2022 - External validation of the MidiCAT variant of thro.pdf
Author postprint (982.66 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
blood coagulation tests; centrifugation; laboratory/methods; thrombin generation assay; thrombomodulin; Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Abstract :
[en] INTRODUCTION: To perform Calibrated Automated Thrombography (CAT), the use of reduced plasma volumes (referred to as "MidiCAT") makes it possible to more efficiently use limited volumes of valuable biobanked plasma samples and decreases expenses for reagents. It is, however, unclear whether the MidiCAT procedure is suitable when thrombin generation (TG) is studied in the presence of added thrombomodulin (TG-TM). Moreover, a simplified centrifugation scheme would facilitate biobanking, if appropriate, for more sensitive coagulation studies. We aimed to compare the results of "MidiCAT" (halved plasma and reagent volumes) with those from regular CAT, in the absence or presence of TM, as well as to study the impact of a single-centrifugation scheme for plasma preparation before freezing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plasma samples were prepared from the citrated blood from 20 Geneva hospital diverse patients without gross coagulation abnormalities with a single- or double-centrifugation scheme. Samples were kept frozen at -80°C and thawed just before the TG assay in duplicate under two conditions: 1 pM tissue factor (TF) or 5 pM TF + TM. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: (1) We externally validated "MidiCAT" and also extended the validation to TG-TM. Whatever the method (CAT or MidiCAT), intra-assay (assessed with duplicates) CV was below 6% (1 pM TF) or below 10% (5 pM TF + TM) for ETP. Agreement between the MidiCAT and CAT results was satisfactory; the p coefficients were above 0.95 for ETP and above 0.90 for most other parameters; biases for ETP were +10.0% (1 pM FT) and +13.5% (5 pM + TM). (2) The centrifugation scheme markedly affected the results obtained in the presence of TM, whereas the bias and limit of agreement (difference plots) were low for the no TM condition. The bias in the presence of TM was obvious, more marked with plasma samples sensitive to TM when double centrifuged: the lower the ETP-TM, the greater the relative difference between the ETP-TM of plasma samples prepared with just single centrifugation and the reference plasma samples. Thus, a single-centrifugation procedure, as is often used for plasma biobanking, is suitable for TG study only if it is not performed in the presence of TM.
Disciplines :
Hematology
Author, co-author :
Charles, Sébastien  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA Immunobiology - Hematology ; INSERM UMR 1059, Equipe SAINBIOSE, Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Étienne, France ; Centre d’Investigation Clinique CIC 1408, CHU Saint Etienne, Saint-Étienne, France
Guyotat, Denis;  Département d'Hématologie et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Institut de Cancérologie Universitaire, CHU Saint Etienne, Saint-Étienne, France
Fontana, Pierre;  Geneva Platelet Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland ; Division of Angiology and Haemostasis, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
Tardy, Bernard;  Centre d'Investigation Clinique CIC 1408, CHU Saint Etienne, Saint-Étienne, France
Lecompte, Thomas;  Geneva Platelet Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland ; Division of Angiology and Haemostasis, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
Chalayer, Emilie;  INSERM UMR 1059, Equipe SAINBIOSE, Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Étienne, France ; Département d'Hématologie et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Institut de Cancérologie Universitaire, CHU Saint Etienne, Saint-Étienne, France
Language :
English
Title :
External validation of the MidiCAT variant of thrombography: Comparison with calibrated automated thrombography and study of the centrifugation scheme.
Publication date :
2022
Journal title :
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
eISSN :
2297-055X
Publisher :
Frontiers, Switzerland
Volume :
9
Pages :
998687
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funding text :
We thank the Center of Laboratory Medicine in Geneva for providing the devices, as well as Oana Bulla for the technical assistance. We thank the Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Center in Saint-Priest-en-Jarez for supporting the work performed by EC during her postdoctoral stay in Geneva, Switzerland. We also thank Daniel Petrov for the English language corrections.
Available on ORBi :
since 07 April 2025

Statistics


Number of views
33 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
19 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi