Article (Scientific journals)
Straight leg raise versus knee extension angle: which structure limits the test in asymptomatic subjects?
Pesesse, Pierre; Wolfs, Sébastien; Colman, David et al.
2025In Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy, p. 1 - 9
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
To share Straight Leg Raise versus Knee Extension Angle which structure limits the test in asymptomatic subjects.pdf
Author preprint (1.05 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Straight leg raise test; hamstring muscles; knee extension angle test; mechanosensitivity; range of motion articular; structural differentiation
Abstract :
[en] [en] OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine if the first onset of symptoms (discomfort) during the straight leg raise (SLR) (hip flexion with an extended knee) and the Knee Extension Angle (KEA) tests (knee extension with 90°of hip flexion) results from nervous or muscular structures in asymptomatic individuals. The secondary objective was to investigate if the gender influences the structure related to the discomfort. METHODS: This cross-sectional study consisted of a single assessment session during which the structure related to participants' discomfort during the KEA and SLR was identified. For this identification, a structural differentiation (SD) was conducted during both tests using passive mobilization of the cervicothoracic spine in flexion and extension. Changes in participants' discomfort were monitored during the SD to determine whether a change or lack of change was consistent with variations in the load applied to the suspected structures either muscular or neural. If the structure related to the participants' discomfort could not be identified, two additional tests were conducted: the lateral SLR and the Slump test. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-eight individuals were included. Median [IQR] age was 21 years [20;23], and 57.3% were female. The structure related to participants' discomfort was similar for the SLR and the KEA (p = 0.451): neural for 72.5% of participants in the SLR and 75.8% in the KEA. Gender only influenced the structure identified in the KEA test, with a significantly higher rate of nerve-related discomfort in females than males and a significantly higher rate of muscle-related discomfort in males (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic individuals, the discomfort induced by the SLR and the KEA tests could be related to either muscular or neural structures. Therefore, structural differentiation is necessary to identify the structure causing the discomfort in both research and clinical practice.
Research Center/Unit :
EVAREVA - Évaluation‐Revalidation - ULiège
Disciplines :
Orthopedics, rehabilitation & sports medicine
Author, co-author :
Pesesse, Pierre  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des Sciences de l'activité physique et de la réadaptation
Wolfs, Sébastien ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des Sciences de l'activité physique et de la réadaptation
Colman, David  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des Sciences de l'activité physique et de la réadaptation
Grosdent, Stéphanie  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des Sciences de l'activité physique et de la réadaptation
Vanderthommen, Marc ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des Sciences de l'activité physique et de la réadaptation > Kinésithérapie spécifique et réadaptation motrice
Demoulin, Christophe  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des Sciences de l'activité physique et de la réadaptation > Kinésithérapie spécifique et réadaptation motrice
Language :
English
Title :
Straight leg raise versus knee extension angle: which structure limits the test in asymptomatic subjects?
Publication date :
24 February 2025
Journal title :
Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy
ISSN :
1066-9817
Publisher :
Informa UK Limited, England
Pages :
1 - 9
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 03 April 2025

Statistics


Number of views
70 (5 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
49 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi