diagnosis; disorders of consciousness; follow-up tool; prognosis; telephone follow-up; Humans; Follow-Up Studies; Prognosis; Patients; Consciousness Disorders/rehabilitation; Consciousness; Consciousness Disorders; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: The significant lack of rehabilitation prognostic data is the main reason that affects the treatment decision-making and ethical issues of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC). Currently, the clinic's consciousness assessment tools cannot satisfy DoC patients' follow-up needs.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to construct a sensitive, professional, and simple telephone follow-up scale for DoC patients to follow up on the prognosis, especially the recovery of consciousness, of prolonged DoC patients transferred to community hospitals or at home.
METHODS: This study is to adopt expert consultation to construct and to verify the validity and feasibility of the scale on-site.
CONCLUSION: At present, there is a strong demand for portable, accurate, and easily operated scales. It is helpful to improve the rehabilitation data of prolonged DoC patients and provide more basis for their treatment and rehabilitation.
Disciplines :
Neurosciences & behavior
Author, co-author :
Shou, Fangfang; International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China ; Faculty of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
Wang, Jing; International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
Laureys, Steven ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques
Cheng, Lijuan; International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
Huang, Wangshan; International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
Di, Haibo; International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
Language :
English
Title :
Study protocol: Developing telephone follow-up scale for patients with disorders of consciousness.
Publication date :
2023
Journal title :
Frontiers in Public Health
eISSN :
2296-2565
Publisher :
Frontiers, Switzerland
Volume :
11
Pages :
1071008
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funding text :
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 81920108023).
Bruno MA Vanhaudenhuyse A Thibaut A Moonen G Laureys S. From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness. J Neurol. (2011) 258:1373–84. 10.1007/s00415-011-6114-x21674197
Giacino JT Ashwal S Childs N Cranford R Jennett B Katz DI et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. (2002) 58:349–53. 10.1212/WNL.58.3.34912434799
Giacino JT Schnakers C Rodriguez-Moreno D Kalmar K Schiff N Hirsch J. Behavioral assessment in patients with disorders of consciousness: gold standard or fool's gold? Prog Brain Res. (2009) 177:33–48. 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17704-X19818893
Seel RT Sherer M Whyte J Katz DI Giacino JT Rosenbaum AM et al. Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2010) 91:1795–813. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.21821112421
Giacino JT Kalmar K Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2004) 85:2020–9. 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.03315605342
Di H He M Zhang Y Cheng L Wang F Nie Y et al. Chinese translation of the Coma recovery scale-revised. Brain Inj. (2017) 31:363–5. 10.1080/02699052.2016.125578028125307
Zhang Y Wang J Schnakers C He M Luo H Cheng L et al. Validation of the Chinese version of the coma recovery scale-revised (CRS-R). Brain Inj. (2019) 33:529–33. 10.1080/02699052.2019.156683230663434
Wannez S Heine L Thonnard M Gosseries O Laureys S. The repetition of behavioral assessments in diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol. (2017) 81:883–9. 10.1002/ana.2496228543735
Zou B Li X Huang X Xiong D Liu Y. Telephone follow-up design and practice for advanced cancer pain patients. J Cancer Educ. (2020) 35:751–9. 10.1007/s13187-019-01523-430989478
Bakker WJ Roos MM Kerkman T Burgmans JPJ. Experience with the PINQ-PHONE telephone questionnaire for detection of recurrences after endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. (2019) 23:685–91. 10.1007/s10029-019-01909-930778858
Kuprasertkul A Christie AL Zimmern P A. standardized telephone interview with validated questionnaires for very long-term evaluation of women lost to follow-up after a stress urinary incontinence procedure. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. (2021) 13:366–71. 10.1111/luts.1237833783127
Danko KJ Dahabreh IJ Ivers NM Moher D Grimshaw JM. Contacting authors by telephone increased response proportions compared with emailing: results of a randomized study. J Clin Epidemiol. (2019) 115:150–9. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.02731152865
Thakkar J Kurup R Laba TL Santo K Thiagalingam A Rodgers A et al. Mobile telephone text messaging for medication adherence in chronic disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. (2016) 176:340–9. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.766726831740
Xin Y Li X Du J Cheng J Yi C Mao H. Efficacy of telephone follow-up in children tonsillectomy with day surgery. Indian J Pediatr. (2019) 86:263–6. 10.1007/s12098-018-2813-y30547424
Rochette C Michallet AS Malartre-Sapienza S Rodier S. Telephone follow-up of oncology patients: the contribution of the nurse specialist for a Service-Dominant Logic in hospital. BMC Health Serv Res. (2021) 21:580. 10.1186/s12913-021-06552-834134672
Qiao J Liu X Shan Y. Research progress of telephone follow-up in continuing care of discharged patients. J Nurs Sci. (2012) 27:95–7. 10.3969/j.isn.1672-5921.2009.12.002
Carrière M Cassol H Aubinet C Panda R Thibaut A Larroque SK et al. Auditory localization should be considered as a sign of minimally conscious state based on multimodal findings. Brain Commun. (2020) 2:fcaa195. 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa19533426527
Martens G Bodien Y Sheau K Christoforou A Giacino JT. Which behaviours are first to emerge during recovery of consciousness after severe brain injury? Ann Phys Rehabil Med. (2020) 63:263–9. 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.10.00431783144
Cortese MD Arcuri F Nemirovsky IE Lucca LF Tonin P Soddu A et al. Nociceptive response is a possible marker of evolution in the level of consciousness in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome patients. Front Neurosci. (2021) 15:771505. 10.3389/fnins.2021.77150534975378
Wang J Zhang S Liu W Zhang Y Hu Z Sun Z et al. Olfactory stimulation and the diagnosis of patients with disorders of consciousness: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Front Neurosci. (2022) 16:712891. 10.3389/fnins.2022.71289135250440
Arzi A Rozenkrantz L Gorodisky L Rozenkrantz D Holtzman Y Ravia A et al. Olfactory sniffing signals consciousness in unresponsive patients with brain injuries. Nature. (2020) 581:428–33. 10.1038/s41586-020-2245-532461641
Vetter TR Schober P. Agreement analysis: what he said, she said vs. you said. Anesth Analg. (2018) 126:2123–8. 10.1213/ANE.000000000000292429677066
Gao D Su Y Zhang Y Wang L Gao R Zhao J et al. Prognostic prediction of acute stroke patients with disturbance of consciousness by different coma scales. Chin J Cerebrovasc Dis. (2009) 6:620–5. 10.3870/hlxz.2012.20.09534538231
Wang J Hu X Hu Z Sun Z Laureys S Di H. The misdiagnosis of prolonged disorders of consciousness by a clinical consensus compared with repeated coma-recovery scale-revised assessment. BMC Neurol. (2020) 20:343. 10.1186/s12883-020-01924-932919461
Wang F He Y Qu J Xie Q Lin Q Ni X et al. Enhancing clinical communication assessments using an audiovisual BCI for patients with disorders of consciousness. J Neural Eng. (2017) 14:046024. 10.1088/1741-2552/aa6c3128393761
Teasdale G Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale Lancet. (1974) 2:81–4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)91639-04136544
Wijdicks EF Bamlet WR Maramattom BV Manno EM McClelland RL. Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Ann Neurol. (2005) 58:585–93. 10.1002/ana.2061121505790
Shiel A Horn SA Wilson BA Watson MJ Campbell MJ McLellan DL. The Wessex Head Injury Matrix (WHIM) main scale: a preliminary report on a scale to assess and monitor patient recovery after severe head injury. Clin Rehabil. (2000) 14:408–16. 10.1191/0269215500cr326oa10945425
Wilson SL Gill-Thwaites H. Early indication of emergence from vegetative state derived from assessments with the SMART—a preliminary report. Brain Inj. (2000) 14:319–31. 10.1080/02699050012061910815840
Ansell BJ Keenan JE. The Western Neuro Sensory Stimulation Profile: a tool for assessing slow-to-recover head-injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (1989) 70:104–8. 10.1037/t28459-0002916926
Pape TL Tang C Guernon A Lundgren S Blahnik M Wei Y et al. Predictive value of the disorders of consciousness scale (DOCS). Pmr. (2009) 1:152–61. 10.1016/j.pmrj.2008.11.00219627889
Pistoia F Sacco S Sarà M Carolei A. The perception of pain and its management in disorders of consciousness. Curr Pain Headache Rep. (2013) 17:374. 10.1007/s11916-013-0374-324078014
Wang J Di H Hua W Cheng L Xia Z Hu Z et al. A study of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the nociception coma scale-revised. Clin Rehabil. (2020) 34:1112–21. 10.1177/026921552092744532571099
Rémi J Pfefferkorn T Owens RL Schankin C Dehning S Birnbaum T et al. The crossed leg sign indicates a favorable outcome after severe stroke. Neurology. (2011) 77:1453–6. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318232abe421987641
Sattin D Giovannetti AM Ciaraffa F Covelli V Bersano A Nigri A et al. Assessment of patients with disorder of consciousness: do different Coma Recovery Scale scoring correlate with different settings? J Neurol. (2014) 261:2378–86. 10.1007/s00415-014-7478-525239389
Formisano R Contrada M Aloisi M Ferri G Schiattone S Iosa M et al. Nociception Coma Scale with personalized painful stimulation vs. standard stimulus in non-communicative patients with disorders of consciousness. Neuropsychol Rehabil. (2020) 30:1893–904. 10.1080/09602011.2019.161446431088203
Sattin D Magnani FG Cacciatore M Leonardi M. Towards a new assessment tool for caregivers of patients with disorders of consciousness: the social and family evaluation scale (SAFE). Brain Sci. (2022) 12:323. 10.3390/brainsci1203032335326279
Bossers SM van der Naalt J Jacobs B Schwarte LA Verheul R Schober P. Face-to-face vs. telephonic extended glasgow outcome score testing after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. (2021) 36:E134–e8. 10.1097/HTR.000000000000062233201032
Hermann B Salah AB Perlbarg V Valente M Pyatigorskaya N Habert MO et al. Habituation of auditory startle reflex is a new sign of minimally conscious state. Brain. (2020) 143:2154–72. 10.1093/brain/awaa15932582938
Magliacano A Rosenfelder M Hieber N Bender A Estraneo A Trojano L. Spontaneous eye blinking as a diagnostic marker in prolonged disorders of consciousness. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:22393. 10.1038/s41598-021-01858-334789832
