Seed. Commodification, decommodification and commoning

Girard, Fabien; Frison, Christine; Noiville, Christine

doi:10.4324/9781003188742-34

No full text

Contribution to collective works (Parts of books)

Seed. Commodification, decommodification and commoning

Girard, Fabien; Frison, Christine; Noiville, Christine

2023 • In Bertrand, Elodie; Panitch, Vida (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Commodification

Editorial reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/329880

DOI
10.4324/9781003188742-34

Files (0)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

No document available.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Economics; Finance; Business & Industry; Humanities; Social Sciences

Abstract :

[en] The chapter aims to re-contextualize the polarity between the commodification and decommodification of seeds, highlighting reactions and resistances to market pressures. It begins by discussing the emergence of the seed market and its main drivers, such as the biotechnological revolution, intellectual property rights, and the consolidation of the seed industry. The chapter then emphasizes that discontent with changes in agricultural production and economic integration has primarily led to discussions on so-called market failures rather than restricting market transactions. The preservation of public goods, specifically innovation and crop diversity, through the handling of purportedly market failures, has remained a key focus. Additionally, the chapter explores proposals advocating for the radical decommodification of seeds. This perspective aligns with research in ethics and economics on the concept of noxious markets. By examining the ethical and economic aspects of seeds as commodities, the exploration of decommodification (through “open source” and commons-based initiatives) aims to challenge the prevailing market-driven approach to seed production and seed provisioning. The chapter closes with a discussion on the coexistence between market society and peasant farming, examining the feasibility and desirability of maintaining control over innovations and agricultural production models while resisting the complete commodification of seeds.

Disciplines :

European & international law

Author, co-author :

Girard, Fabien

Frison, Christine ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Cité ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de droit > EcoLAWgy

Noiville, Christine

Language :

English

Title :

Seed. Commodification, decommodification and commoning

Publication date :

2023

Main work title :

The Routledge Handbook of Commodification

Publishing director :

Bertrand, Elodie

Panitch, Vida

Publisher :

Routledge, Oxford, United Kingdom

ISBN/EAN :

9781003188742

Peer reviewed :

Editorial reviewed

Available on ORBi :

since 24 March 2025

Statistics

Number of views

26 (0 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

0 (0 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Alabrese, M. et al. (2022) The United Nations’ Declaration on Peasants’ Rights. 1st edn. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003139874
Bavikatte, K.S., Robinson, D.F. and Oliva, M.J. (2015) “Biocultural Community Protocols: Dialogues on the Space Within”, IK: Other Ways of Knowing, 1(2), pp. 1-31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18113/P8ik159704
Bonneuil, C. (2006) “Mendelism, Plant Breeding and Experimental Cultures: Agriculture and the Development of Genetics in France”, Journal of the History of Biology, 39(2), pp. 281-308. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-006-0005-5
Bonneuil, C. (2019) “Seeing Nature as a ‘Universal Store of Genes’: How Biological Diversity Became ‘Genetic Resources’, 1890-1940", Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 75, pp. 1-14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2018.12.002
Bonneuil, C. and Thomas, F. (2009) Gènes, pouvoirs et profits: recherche publique et régimes de production des savoirs de Mendel aux OGM. Versailles: Quae.
Bonny, S. (2014) “Taking stock of the genetically modified seed sector worldwide: market, stakeholders, and prices”, Food Security, 6(4), pp. 525-540. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-014-0357-1
Bonny, S. (2017) “Corporate Concentration and Technological Change in the Global Seed Industry”, Sustainability, 9(9), p. 1632. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091632
Brennan, J. and Jaworski, P.M. (2015) “Markets without Symbolic Limits”, Ethics, 125(4), pp. 1053-1077. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/680907
Calvert, J. and Joly, P.-B. (2011) “How did the gene become a chemical compound? The ontology of the gene and the patenting of DNA”, Social Science Information, 50(2), pp. 157-177. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018411399512
Capra, F. and Mattei, U. (2015) The ecology of law: toward a legal system in tune with nature and community. San Francisco, Calif.: Berrett-Koehler.
Claeys, P. and Peschard, K. (2020) “Transnational Agrarian Movements, Food Sovereignty, and Legal Mobilization”, in Claeys, P. and Peschard, K., The Oxford Handbook of Law and Anthropology. Edited by M.-C. Foblets et al. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198840534.013.40
Congretel, M. and Pinton, F. (2020) “Local knowledge, know-how and knowledge mobilized in a globalized world: A new approach of indigenous local ecological knowledge”, People and Nature, 2(3), pp. 527-543. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10142
Coomes, O.T. et al. (2015) “Farmer seed networks make a limited contribution to agriculture? Four common misconceptions”, Food Policy, 56, pp. 41-50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.07.008
Dardot, P. and Laval, C. (2019) Common on revolution in the 21st century. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
De Jonge, B. and Munyi, P. (2016) “A Differentiated Approach to Plant Variety Protection in Africa: A Differentiated Approach to PVP in Africa”, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 19(1-2), pp. 28-52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12053
De Schutter, O. (2009) Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to food. Seed policies and the right to food: enhancing agrobiodiversity and encouraging innovation. A /64/170. United Nations, General Assembly.
Demeulenaere, É. (2014) “A political ontology of seeds: The transformative frictions of a farmers’ movement in Europe”, Focaal, 2014(69), pp. 45-61.
Demeulenaere, E. and Piersante, Y. (2020) “In or out? Organisational dynamics within European “peasant seed” movements facing opening-up institutions and policies”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(4), pp. 767-791. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1753704
Egelie, K.J. et al. (2016) “The emerging patent landscape of CRISPR-Cas gene editing technology”, Nature Biotechnology, 34(10), pp. 1025-1031. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3692
Friedmann, H. (1980) “Household production and the national economy: Concepts for the analysis of Agrarian formations”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 7(2), pp. 158-184. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066158008438099
Frison, C. (2018) Redesigning the global seed commons: law and policy for agrobiodiversity and food security. London: Routledge.
Girard, F. (2015) "‘Though the treasure of nature’s germens tumble all together’: the EPO and patents on native traits or the bewitching powers of ideologies”, Prometheus, 33(1), pp. 43-65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2015.1061258
Girard, F. and Frison, C. (2018) The commons, plant breeding and agricultural research: challenges for food security and agrobiodiversity. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.
Girard, F. and Frison, C. (2021) “From Farmers’ Rights to the Rights of Peasants: Seeds and the Biocultural Turn”, Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, 102, pp. 461-476.
Girard, F., Hall, I. and Frison, C. (2022) Biocultural Rights, Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. London: Routledge.
Godt, C. (2018) “Technology, Patents and Markets: The Implied Lessons of the EU Commission’s Intervention in the Broccoli/Tomatoes Case of 2016 for Modern (Plant) Genome Editing”, IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 49(5), pp. 512-535. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-018-0710-6
Graff, G.D. et al. (2004) “Access to intellectual property is a major obstacle to developing transgenic horticultural crops”, California Agriculture, 58(2), pp. 120-126.
Gray, B.N. and Spruill, W.M. (2017) “CRISPR-Cas9 claim sets and the potential to stifle innovation”, Nature Biotechnology, 35(7), pp. 630-633. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3913
Gudeman, S. (2016) Anthropology and economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gutiérrez Escobar, L. and Fitting, E. (2016) “The ‘Red de Semillas Libres’: Contesting Biohegemony in Colombia”, Journal of Agrarian Change, 16(4), pp. 711-719. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12161
Halpert, M.-T. and Chappell, M.J. (2017) “Prima facie reasons to question enclosed intellectual property regimes and favor open-source regimes for germplasm”, F1000Research, 6, p. 284. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10497.1
Hardison, P. (2009) “Appendix 2. Indigenous Peoples & the Commons”, in E. Abrell and Natural Justice (eds) Implementing A Traditional Knowledge Commons. Opportunities and Challenges. Cape Town: Natural Justice, pp. 40-44.
Haugen, H.M. (2020) “The UN Declaration on Peasants’ Rights (UNDROP): Is Article 19 on seed rights adequately balancing intellectual property rights and the right to food?", The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 23(3-4), pp. 288-309. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12152
Heller, M.A. and Eisenberg, R.S. (1998) “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research”, Science, 280(5364), pp. 698-701. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5364.698
Hendrickson, M., Howard, P.H. and Constance, D. (2017) Power, Food and Agriculture: Implications for Farmers, Consumers and Communities. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3066005. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3066005
Herforth, A. et al. (2019) “Agrobiodiversity and Feeding the World: More of the Same Will Result in More of the Same”, in Agrobiodiversity: Integrating Knowledge for a Sustainable Future. Cambridge (Mass.); London: MIT Press, pp. 185-211. Available at: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/101250 (Accessed: 24 April 2021).
Herpers, S. et al. (2017) The support for farmer-led seed systems in African seed laws. ISSD Africa: Synthesis paper. ISSD Africa, Wageningen University, KIT, Future Agricultures, Tegemeo Institute of Agricultural Policy and Development.
Howard, P.H. (2009) “Visualizing Consolidation in the Global Seed Industry: 1996-2008", Sustainability, 1(4), pp. 1266-1287. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su1041266
Howard, P.H. (2015) “Intellectual Property and Consolidation in the Seed Industry”, Crop Science, 55(6), pp. 2489-2495. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.09.0669
Howard, P.L. (2010) “Culture and Agrobiodiversity: Understanding the Links”, in S. Pilgrim and J.N. Pretty (eds) Nature and Culture. Rebuilding Lost Connections. London; Washington (DC): Routledge, pp. 163-184. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849776455
IPBES (2019) Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Zenodo. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3553579
Janis, M.D., Jervis, H.H. and Peet, R. (2014) Intellectual property law of plants. First edition. Oxford, United Kingdom; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Jarvis, D.I. (2016) Crop genetic diversity in the field and on the farm: principles and applications in research practices. Yale University Press. New Haven.
Jarvis, D.I. et al. (2011) “An Heuristic Framework for Identifying Multiple Ways of Supporting the Conservation and Use of Traditional Crop Varieties within the Agricultural Production System”, Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30(1-2), pp. 125-176. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.554358
Jarvis, D.I. et al. (2016) Crop genetic diversity in the field and on the farm: principles and applications in research practices. New Haven: Yale University Press. Available at: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1193647
Jodha, N.S. (1985) “Market forces and erosion of common property resources”, in Agricultural Markets in the Semi-Arid Tropics. Proceedings of the International Workshop held at ICRISAT Center, India, 24-28 October 1983. Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India: ICRISAT, pp. 263-227.
Joseph, S.K. (2020) Customary rights of farmers in neoliberal India: a legal and policy analysis. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Juma, C. (1989) The gene hunters: biotechnology and the scramble for seeds. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University.
Kaul, I., Grunberg, I. and Stern, M. (1999) Global Public Goods. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195130529.001.0001
Khoury, C.K. et al. (2015) Estimation of countries’ interdependence in plant genetic resources provisioning national food supplies and production systems. Rome: The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
Khoury, C.K. et al. (2022) “Crop genetic erosion: understanding and responding to loss of crop diversity”, New Phytologist, 233(1), pp. 84-118. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17733
Kloppenburg, J. (2010) “Impeding Dispossession, Enabling Repossession: Biological Open Source and the Recovery of Seed Sovereignty: Biological Open Source and the Recovery of Seed Sovereignty”, Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(3), pp. 367-388. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00275.x
Kloppenburg, J. (2014) “Re-purposing the master’s tools: the open source seed initiative and the struggle for seed sovereignty”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(6), pp. 1225-1246. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2013.875897
Kloppenburg, J.R. (2005) First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology. Madison; Chicago: University of Wisconsin Press Chicago Distribution Center. Available at: http://site.ebrary.com/id/10217039
Kock, M.A. (2021) “Open Intellectual Property Models for Plant Innovations in the Context of New Breeding Technologies”, Agronomy, 11(6), p. 1218. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061218
Kock, M.A. and ten Have, F. (2016) “The ‘International Licensing Platform-Vegetables’: A prototype of a patent clearing house in the life science industry”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 11(7), pp. 496-515. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpw073
Kotschi, J. and Horneburg, B. (2018) “The Open Source Seed Licence: A novel approach to safeguarding access to plant germplasm”, PLOS Biology, 16(10), p. e3000023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000023
Le Teno, S., Cogolati, S. and Frison, C. (2022) “The right to seeds: using the Commons as a sustainable governance scheme to implement peasants’ rights?", in M. Alabrese et al. (eds) The United Nations Declaration on the rights of peasants and other people working in rural areas in perspective. New international standards on natural resources and food systems. Oxon, New York: Routledge, pp. 119-133.
Llewelyn, M. and Adcock, M. (2006) European plant intellectual property. Portland: Hart Publishing.
Louwaars, N.P. (2018) “Plant breeding and diversity: A troubled relationship?", Euphytica, 214(7), p. 114. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-018-2192-5
Luby, C.H. et al. (2015) “Enhancing Freedom to Operate for Plant Breeders and Farmers through Open Source Plant Breeding”, Crop Science, 55(6), pp. 2481-2488. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.10.0708
McGuire, S. and Sperling, L. (2016) “Seed systems smallholder farmers use”, Food Security, 8(1), pp. 179-195. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0528-8
Metzger, A. and Zech, H. (2020) A Comprehensive Approach to Plant Variety Rights and Patents in the Field of Innovative Plants. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3675534. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3675534
Mgbeoji, I. (2003) “Beyond Rhetoric: State Sovereignty, Common Concern, and the Inapplicability of the Common Heritage Concept to Plant Genetic Resources”, Leiden Journal of International Law, 16(4), pp. 821-837. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S092215650300147X
Montenegro de Wit, M. (2019) “Beating the bounds: how does ‘open source’ become a seed commons?", The Journal of Peasant Studies, 46(1), pp. 44-79. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1383395
O’Grady Walshe, C. (2020) Globalisation and Seed Sovereignty in Sub-Saharan Africa. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
O’Neill, J. (2007) Markets, deliberation and environment. London; New York: Routledge.
OECD (2018) Concentration in Seed Markets: Potential Effects and Policy Responses. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264308367-en
Peschard, K. (2017) “Seed wars and farmers’ rights: comparative perspectives from Brazil and India”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(1), pp. 144-168. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1191471
Peschard, K. and Randeria, S. (2020) "‘Keeping seeds in our hands’: the rise of seed activism”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(4), pp. 613-647. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1753705
Peukert, A. (2019) “Fictitious Commodities: A Theory of Intellectual Property Inspired by Karl Polanyi’s ‘Great Transformation’ ", Fordham intellectual property, media & entertainment law journal, 29(4), pp. 1151-1200.
Pistorius, R. (1997) Scientists, plants and politics: a history of the plant genetic resources movement. Rome: IPGRI.
Pistorius, R. and Wijk, J. van (1999) The exploitation of plant genetic information: political strategies in crop development. Wallingford: CABI publ.
Polanyi, K. (2001[1944]) The Great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. 2nd edn. Boston: Beacon Press.
Prifti, V. (2015) The Breeder’s Exception to Patent Rights: Analysis of Compliance with Article 30 of the TRIPS Agreement. Cham: Springer International Publishing (International Law and Economics). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15771-9
Rangnekar, D. (1996) “Commodification of seeds”, Science as Culture, 6(2), pp. 301-312. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439609526469
Rangnekar, D. (2000) Innovative appropriation: the role of law, economics and science in transforming plants into products-a case study of wheat breeding in the UK. Kingston University.
Reyes-García, V. et al. (2018) “Governing landraces and associated knowledge as a commons: from theory to practice”, in F. Girard and C. Frison (eds) The commons, plant breeding and agricultural research: challenges for food security and agrobiodiversity. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 197-209.
Rogan, T. (2019) The moral economists: R.H. Tawney, Karl Polanyi, E.P. Thompson, and the critique of capitalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Sanderson, J. (2017) Plants, People and Practices: The Nature and History of the UPOV Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316411216
Santos, B. de S. and Rodríguez-Garavito, C.A. (2005) “Law, politics, and the subaltern in counter-hegemonic globalization”, in B. de S. Santos and C.A. Rodríguez-Garavito (eds) Law and Globalization from Below. 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494093.001
Satz, D. (2010) Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311594.001.0001
Schenkelaars, P., de Vriend, H. and Kalaitzandonakes, N. (2011) Drivers of Consolidation in the Seed Industry and its Consequences for Innovation | Forum Grüne Vernunft. COGEM. Available at: www.gruenevernunft.de/meldung/drivers-consolidation-seed-industry-and-its-consequences-innovation
Schlager, E. and Ostrom, E. (1992) “Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis”, Land Economics, 68(3), pp. 249-262. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3146375
Sedjo, R.A. (1992) “Property Rights, Genetic Resources, and Biotechnological Change”, The Journal of Law & Economics, 35(1), pp. 199-213.
Sengupta, N. (1995) “Common Property Institutions and Markets”, Indian Economic Review, 30(2), pp. 187-201.
Sievers-Glotzbach, S. and Christinck, A. (2021) “Introduction to the symposium: seed as a commons-exploring innovative concepts and practices of governing seed and varieties”, Agriculture and Human Values, 38(2), pp. 499-507. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10166-x
Toledo, V.M. (1990) “The Ecological Rationality of Peasant Production”, in M.A. Altieri and S.B. Hecht (eds) Agroecology and Small Farm Development. Boca Raton, FL; Ann Arbor: CRC Press, pp. 53-60.
Tordjman, H. (2008) “La construction d’une marchandise: le cas des semences”, Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 63(6), pp. 1341-1368. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0395264900038154
Tsioumani, E. (2020) Fair and Equitable Benefit-Sharing in Agriculture: Reinventing Agrarian Justice. 1st edn. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429198304
van der Ploeg, J.D. (2010) “The peasantries of the twenty-first century: the commoditisation debate revisited”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(1), pp. 1-30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150903498721
van der Ploeg, J.D. (2018) The new peasantries: struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. Abingdon [England]: Routledge.
Wattnem, T. (2016) “Seed laws, certification and standardization: outlawing informal seed systems in the Global South”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(4), pp. 850-867. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2015.1130702
Weston, B.H. and Bollier, D. (2014) Green governance: ecological survival, human rights, and the law of the commons. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.