access and benefit sharing; biodiversity; committee; Digital Sequence Information (DSI); genomics; plant genetic resources; Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA); Forestry; Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics; Plant Science; Horticulture
Abstract :
[en] Societal Impact Statement: Reading and writing DNA is now possible with an unprecedented speed and ease. To catch up with digitization of genetic resources, scientists need to join with all relevant stakeholders and design new global governance mechanisms for digital sequence information. We propose the establishment of a Multi-stakeholder Committee on the Governance of Digital Sequence Information (DSI). This multi-disciplinary body will be dedicated to mitigate governance issues associated with the digitization of genetic resources. Solving the DSI conundrum is sorely needed given the forthcoming multilateral meetings of the Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) framework (the next CBD COP is scheduled in 2021) that are central to tackle the global loss of biodiversity, global warming, pandemic risk and food insecurity. Summary: Contemporary research is increasingly data-centric and the rise of genomics revolutionized our approach and use of genetic resources. However, genomics developed relatively independently from the international instruments on the conservation of biological diversity, in particular the Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) framework. The legal and political status of Digital Sequence Information (DSI) derived from genetic resources emerged recently as a contentious point in the various ABS instruments dealing with genetic resources. In view of the multiple parallel and uncoordinated debates that occurred in various forums dealing with plants, animals, terrestrial, microbial, marine and agricultural biodiversity, we propose here to take a step back in the discussion. We argue that DSI should be considered as an overarching issue to be addressed through a coordinated and inclusive Multi-stakeholder Committee that would assess its position and role within the existing ABS regime complex. This Multi-stakeholder Committee on the Governance of Digital Sequence Information, that may run under the auspices of the United Nations, will be dedicated to mitigate global governance issues associated with the digitization of genetic resources. In this paper, we sketch this body as a transversal and inclusive tool to facilitate long-term coherence in all ABS policy forums.
Disciplines :
European & international law
Author, co-author :
Aubry, Sylvain ; Federal Office for Agriculture, Bern, Switzerland ; Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
Frison, Christine ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Cité ; Government and Law Research Group, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium ; F.R.S-FNRS, University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Medaglia, Jorge C.; University of Costa Rica, San Pedro, Costa Rica
Frison, Emile ; Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Maccarese, Italy
Jaspars, Marcel ; Marine Biodiscovery Centre, Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
Rabone, Muriel ; Life Sciences Department, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom
Sirakaya, Aysegul ; Faculty of Law, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
Saxena, Devanshi ; Government and Law Research Group, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
van Zimmeren, Esther; Government and Law Research Group, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Bringing access and benefit sharing into the digital age
FWO - Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen SNF - Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Funding text :
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policies or positions of their affiliated institutions. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (#31003A_172977) and the Research Foundation (FWO) Flanders (grant n°12X8318N).
Aubry, S. (2019). The future of digital sequence information for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01046
Belanger, J., & Pilling, D. (2019). The state of the world’s biodiversity for food and agriculture. http://www.fao.org/state-of-biodiversity-for-food-agriculture/en/
Blasiak, R., Wynberg, R., Grorud-Colvert, K., Thambisetty, S., Bandarra, N. M., Canário, A. V. M., da Silva, J., Duarte, C. M., Jaspars, M., Rogers, A. et al (2020). The ocean genome and future prospects for conservation and equity. Nature Sustainability, 3, 588–596. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0522-9
Boesch, D. F. (1999). The role of science in ocean governance. Ecological Economics, 31(2), 189–198.
Bond, M. R., & Scott, D. (2020). Digital biopiracy and the (dis)assembling of the Nagoya Protocol. Geoforum, 117, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.001
Cabrera Medaglia, J. (2020). Digital Sequence Information (DSI) and benefit-sharing arising from its use: An unfinished discussion. GRUR International, 69, 565–566. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa057
Cabrera Medaglia, J., & Perron-Welch, F. (2019). The benefit-sharing principle in international law. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 14, 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpy162
CBD. (1992). Convention on biological diversity. http://www.CBD.int/
CBD. (2019). CBD ATHEG studies on Digital Sequence Informations. https://www.CBD.int/meetings/DSI-AHTEG-2020-01
CFS. (2017). The global strategic framework for food security and nutrition. http://www.fao.org/cfs/home/products/onlinegsf/en/
De Schutter, O. (2013). The reform of the committee on world food security: The quest for coherence in global governance. https://cridho.uclouvain.be/documents/Working.Papers/CRIDHO-WP-2013-8-ODeSchutter-CFS-GolbalGovernance.pdf
Deplazes-Zemp, A., Abiven, S., Schaber, P., Schaepman, M., Schaepman-Strub, G., Schmid, B., Shimizu, K. K., & Altermatt, F. (2018). The Nagoya Protocol could backfire on the Global South. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, 917–919. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0561-z
dos S. Ribeiro, C., Koopmans, M. P., & Haringhuizen, G. B. (2018). Threats to timely sharing of pathogen sequence data. Science, 362, 404–406. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5229
Finkelstein, L. S. (1995). What is global governance? Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 1(3), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-001-03-90000007
Frison, C. (2018). Redesigning the global seed commons law and policy for agrobiodiversity and food security. Routledge.
Frison, C. (2021). Biodiversity. In K. De Feyter, S. De Moerloose, & G. Türkelli (Eds.), Law & development encyclopaedia (pp. 1–32). Edward Elgar.
Halewood, M., Lopez Noriega, I., Ellis, D., Roa, C., Rouard, M., & Sackville, H. R. (2018). Using genomic sequence information to increase conservation and sustainable use of crop diversity and benefit-sharing. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 16, 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2018.0043
Herz, M. (2018). Formal and informal groups. In G. W. Weiss & S. Daws (Eds.), The Oxford Hanbook on the United Nations (pp. 332–345). Oxford University Press.
Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2003). Ideas, artifacts, and facilities: Information as a common-pool resource. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66, 111–146.
Humphries, F., Gottlieb, H. M., Laird, S., Wynberg, R., Lawson, C., Rourke, M., Tvedt, M. W., Oliva, M. J., & Jaspars, M. (2020). A tiered approach to the marine genetic resource governance framework under the proposed UNCLOS agreement for biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ). Marine Policy, 122, 103910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103910
IPBES. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. https://ipbes.net/global-assessment
ITPGRFA. (2004). International treaty on plant genetic resources for food of the food and agriculture organization. www.fao.org/3rd/a-i0510e.pdf%0A%0A
Jungcurt, S. (2008). Institutional interplay in international environmental governance: Policy interdependence and strategic interaction in the regime complex on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Shaker Verlag.
Laird, S., Wynberg, R., Rourke, M., Humphries, F., Muller, M. R., & Lawson, C. (2020). Rethink the expansion of access and benefit sharing. Science, 367, 1200–1202. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba9609
Lawson, C., Burton, H., & Humphries, F. (2018). The important place of information in the evolving legal and policy framework for the conservation and sustainable use of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. European Intellectual Property Review, 40.
Leonelli, S. (2014). Data interpretation in the digital age. Perspectives on Science, 22, 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00140
Lewin, H. A., Robinson, G. E., Kress, W. J., Baker, W. J., Coddington, J., Crandall, K. A., Durbin, R., Edwards, S. V., Forest, F., Gilbert, M. T. P., Goldstein, M. M., Grigoriev, I. V., Hackett, K. J., Haussler, D., Jarvis, E. D., Johnson, W. E., Patrinos, A., Richards, S., Castilla-Rubio, J. C., … Zhang, G. (2018). Earth BioGenome Project: Sequencing life for the future of life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 4325–4333. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720115115
Mehrabi, Z., McDowell, M. J., Ricciardi, V., Levers, C., Martinez, J. D., Mehrabi, N., Wittman, H., Ramankutty, N., & Jarvis, A. (2020). The global divide in data-driven farming. Nature Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00631-0
Morgera, E. (2016). The need for an international legal concept of fair and equitable benefit sharing. European Journal of International Law, 27, 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chw014
Morgera, E. (2017). Fair and equitable benefit-sharing: History, normative content and status in International Law. In E. Orlando & L. Krämer (Eds.), Encyclopedia of environmental law (pp. 1–15). Principles of Environmental Law.
Morgera, E., Switzer, S., & Geelhoed, M. (2020). Study for the european commission on ‘possible ways to address digital sequence information – legal and policy aspects’. Consultancy project conducted for the European Commission (pp. 1–74). Strathclyde Centre for Environmental.
Oberthür, S., & Pożarowska, J. (2013). Managing institutional complexity and fragmentation: The Nagoya protocol and the global governance of genetic resources. Global Environmental Politics, 13, 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00185
Peres, S. (2016). Saving the gene pool for the future: Seed banks as archives. Studies in History of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 55, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.09.002
Pistorius, R., & van Wijk, J. (1999). The exploitation of plant genetic information: Political strategies in crop development. CABI Publishing.
Rourke, M. (2019). Access by design, benefits if convenient: A closer look at the pandemic influenza preparedness framework’s standard material transfer agreements. The Millbank Quarterly, 97(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12364
Sirakaya, A. (2019). Balanced options for access and benefit-sharing: stakeholder insights on provider country legislation. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01175
Stephens, Z. D., Lee, S. Y., Faghri, F., Campbell, R. H., Zhai, C., Efron, M. J., Iyer, R., Schatz, M. C., Sinha, S., & Robinson, G. E. (2015). Big data: Astronomical or genomical? PLoS Biology, 13, e1002195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002195
Stoll, P. (2009). Access to GRs and benefit sharing: Underlying concepts and the idea of justice. In G. Winter & E. Kamau (Eds.), Genetic resources, traditional knowledge and the law: Solutions for access and benefit sharing (pp. 3–18). Routledge.
Thacker, E. (2005). The global genome. The MIT Press.
UNESCO. (1998). Universal declaration on the human genome and human rights. https://www.ohchr.org/
UNESCO. (2003). International declaration on human genetic data. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000133171.page=45
Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), 795–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/713701075
WILDSI. (2020). WILDSI white paper. https://www.dsmz.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Collection_allg/Final_WiLDSI_White_Paper_Oct7_2020.pdf
WHO (2011). Pandemic influenza preparedness Framework for the sharing of influenza viruses and access to vaccines and other benefits. https://www.who.int/influenza/resources/pip_framework/en/
