Article (Scientific journals)
Mapping of dust source susceptibility by remote sensing and machine learning techniques (case study: Iran-Iraq border).
Pourhashemi, Sima; Asadi, Mohammad Ali Zangane; Boroughani, Mahdi et al.
2023In Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30 (10), p. 27965 - 27979
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
s11356-022-23982-x.pdf
Author postprint (2.5 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Dust storm; Logistic regression (LR); Multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS); Random forest (RF); Dust; Iran; Iraq; Machine Learning; Remote Sensing Technology; Environmental Chemistry; Pollution; Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Abstract :
[en] A dust storm is a major environmental problem affecting many arid regions worldwide. The novel contribution of this study is combining indicators extracted from RS- and statistic-based predictive models to spatial mapping of land susceptibility to dust emissions in a very important dust source area in the borders of Iran and Iraq (Khuzestan province in Iran and Al-Basrah and Maysan provinces in Iraq). In this research, remote sensing (RS) techniques and machine learning techniques, including multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR), were used for dust source identification and susceptibility map preparation. To this end, 152 DSA for the period of 2005-2020 were identified in the study area. Of these DSA data, 70% was assigned to the Dust Source Susceptibility Mapping (DSSM) (training dataset) and 30% to model validation. Consequently, six factors (i.e., soil, lithology, slope, normalized vegetation differential index (NDVI), geomorphology, and land use units) were prepared as DSA's independent and effective variables. The results of all three models indicated that land use had the most impact on DSA. The validation results of these models using the test data showed sub-curves of 0.92, 0.86, and 0.76 for the RF, MARS, and LR models, respectively. Also, results showed that the RF model outperformed MARS (AUC = 0.89) and LR (AUC = 0.78) methods. In all three models, high and very high susceptibility classes generally covered a large percentage of the case study. The highest percentage of dust source points was also in this susceptibility category. Overall, the results of this study can be useful for planners and managers to control and reduce the risk of negative dust consequences.
Disciplines :
Agriculture & agronomy
Author, co-author :
Pourhashemi, Sima;  Department of Geography, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran
Asadi, Mohammad Ali Zangane;  Department of Geography, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran. ma.zanganehasadi@hsu.ac.ir
Boroughani, Mahdi;  Research Center for Geosciences and Social Studies, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran
Azadi, Hossein  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Modélisation et développement ; Department of Geography, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Mapping of dust source susceptibility by remote sensing and machine learning techniques (case study: Iran-Iraq border).
Publication date :
February 2023
Journal title :
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
ISSN :
0944-1344
eISSN :
1614-7499
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, Germany
Volume :
30
Issue :
10
Pages :
27965 - 27979
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
Hakim Sabzevari University
Funding text :
This work was supported by Mohammad Ali Zangane Asadi (Grant) from Hakim Sabzevari University.
Available on ORBi :
since 25 February 2025

Statistics


Number of views
9 (1 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
4 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
10
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
8
OpenCitations
 
3
OpenAlex citations
 
12

publications
0
supporting
0
mentioning
0
contrasting
0
Smart Citations
0
0
0
0
Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi