Article (Scientific journals)
Does Contract Length Matter? The Impact of Various Contract-Farming Regimes on Land-Improvement Investment and the Efficiency of Contract Farmers in Pakistan
Mazhar, Rabia; Azadi, Hossein; Van Passel, Steven et al.
2023In Agriculture, 13 (9), p. 1651
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
agriculture-13-01651-v2.pdf
Author postprint (677.29 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
contract-farming regimes; land-improvement investment; land-use policy; organic farming; productivity; technical efficiency; Food Science; Agronomy and Crop Science; Plant Science
Abstract :
[en] Land-tenure security is integral to local communities’ socioeconomic development. It has been a center of debate in academia and for legislators and advocates to implement reforms to enhance efficient and sustainable development in land management. Yet, knowledge gaps remain in how various contract-farming regimes contribute to land-improvement investment and technical efficiency. This study used a data set of 650 farm households collected through a two-stage stratified sampling to investigate the influence of three contract-farming regimes: long-term, medium-term, and short-term contracts, on the land-improvement investment, productivity, and technical efficiency of contract farmers in Punjab, Pakistan. The study used multivariate probit and ordinary least square regression models to examine the posit relationships. The findings highlight that farmers with long-term land contracts have higher per hectare yield, income and profit than those with medium-term and short-term contracts. The results confirm that farmers with medium- and long-term contracts tend to invest more in land-improvement measures, i.e., organic and green manure. Further, the study findings demonstrate that long-term land tenures are more effective when farmers make decisions regarding the on-farm infrastructure, like tube-well installation, tractor ownership, and holding farm logistics. Last, the study results confirm that long-term contracts are more robust regarding technical efficiency. Moreover, the findings support the Marshallian inefficiency hypothesis and extend the literature on contract farming, land-improvement investment, and land use policy, and offer coherent policy actions for stakeholders to improve farmers’ productivity, technical efficiency, and income.
Disciplines :
Agriculture & agronomy
Author, co-author :
Mazhar, Rabia;  College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
Azadi, Hossein  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Modélisation et développement
Van Passel, Steven ;  Department of Engineering Management, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Värnik, Rando;  Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Rural Economics, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia
Pietrzykowski, Marcin ;  Department of Ecological Engineering and Forest Hydrology, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow, Poland
Skominas, Rytis;  Institute of Hydraulic Engineering, Vytautas Magnus University Agriculture Academy, Kaunas, Lithuania
Wei, Zou;  College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
Xuehao, Bi;  College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
Language :
English
Title :
Does Contract Length Matter? The Impact of Various Contract-Farming Regimes on Land-Improvement Investment and the Efficiency of Contract Farmers in Pakistan
Publication date :
September 2023
Journal title :
Agriculture
eISSN :
2077-0472
Publisher :
MDPI
Volume :
13
Issue :
9
Pages :
1651
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
NSCF - National Natural Science Foundation of China
Funding text :
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China (grant number 42071221): under project named: The Impact of Environment Regulation of Hog reduction on Rural Land Use Change.
Available on ORBi :
since 25 February 2025

Statistics


Number of views
48 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
30 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
3
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
3
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
4

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi