Reference : Attaining per flow QoS with Class-based Differentiated Services
Scientific congresses and symposiums : Paper published in a book
Engineering, computing & technology : Computer science
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/32880
Attaining per flow QoS with Class-based Differentiated Services
English
Tufail, Musassir [Université de Liège - ULiège > Dép. d'électric., électron. et informat. (Inst.Montefiore) > Réseaux informatiques > > > >]
Jennes, Geoffroy [Université de Liège - ULiège > Dép. d'électric., électron. et informat. (Inst.Montefiore) > Réseaux informatiques > > > >]
Leduc, Guy mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > Dép. d'électric., électron. et informat. (Inst.Montefiore) > Réseaux informatiques >]
Sep-1999
Internet II: Quality of Service and Future Directions
Onvural, R.
Civanlar, S.
Luciani, J.
International Society for Optical Engineering
101-112
Yes
No
International
USA
SPIE'99 conference
Sept. 1999
Boston, Massachussetts
USA
[en] adaptable scheduling ; differentiated services
[en] The Differentiated Services (DiffServ or DS) framework takes an edge over IntServ because it is scalable and lesser complex. On the other hand, the application level end-to-end quality o f service, in DiffServ, may get compromised because: 1) network resources are not allocated at microflow level (a data stream pertaining to a single connection) but at aggregate level (collection of one or more microflows), 2) the DiffServ working group does not specify algorithms for PHBs but their output behavio urs and 3) end-to-end quality is function of Service Level Agreements (SLAs) between the adjacent domains transited by the connection and a large diversity in SLAs is quite evident as each DS domain would have different service provision policies. We focus, in this paper, on the first two issues. Our goal is to ha ve DiffServ deployed with all its simplicity and still be able to provide application level end-to-end qu ality of service. For that, we study a PHB for AF classes. A PHB comprises a packet scheduler and a packe t accept/discard algorithm. For packet scheduler, we use the Extended-VirtualClock (Ex-VC) algorithm. Ex-VC perfo rms delay-based service differentiation among the aggregates while selecting a packet for service. The reasons for having delay-based definition for service differentiation are: it is adaptable to load per aggr egate and it does not need to be microflow aware. Other definitions like bandwidth and loss may also be u sed but the former requires microflow aware management and the latter lacks in simplicity. For packet accept/discard algorithm, we use RED when all packets have the same drop precedence level and DI-RO (Deterministic for In-RED for Out) when packets are policed at the ingress DS node and packets viol ating the Service Level Agreement (SLA) are marked OUT. In DI-RO, IN packets are always accepted (except buffer overflow) whereas OUT packets are accepted probabilistically.
Researchers
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/32880

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
RUN-PP99-03.pdfAuthor preprint240.38 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.