Re-imagining client learning and knowledge sharing of architectural services through a multi-layered journey map tool

[en] PurposeIn this paper, we investigate the current conditions as well as possibilities of a better interaction between architects and user–clients in the Belgian single-family housing context. We specifically focus on issues around client learning and knowledge sharing of architectural services.Design/methodology/approachFollowing the research through design methodology, we report on a co-design process converging towards a multi-layered journey map tool. We analyze the discussions held between architects and user-clients during “Ideation & Design” workshops that led to this specific tool idea, within a broader co-design process context.FindingsIn terms of client learning and knowledge sharing, there is a need for (1) sharing the process knowledge, (2) clarifying responsibilities and missions of both parties and (3) considering different levels of engagement of user-clients. Current ways of interaction around these issues are mostly based on verbal exchanges during meetings and written explanations in contracts. In terms of future expectations, it has been revealed that both parties are in favor of (1) keeping the relationship trustworthy but informal, (2) using visual ways of representing the architectural journey and (3) providing additional “pedagogical” support when needed.Originality/valueOur work not only discusses current practices regarding client learning and knowledge sharing of architectural services but also highlights the future-oriented aspirations of architects and user-clients. It proposes actionable design criteria and a multi-layered journey map tool to support the relationship between architects and user-clients, both transferable to architectural education.

Disciplines :

Architecture

Author, co-author :

Yonder, Cigdem ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Urban and Environmental Engineering

Mertens, Audrey ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Urban and Environmental Engineering

Hamarat, Yaprak ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > Composition architecturale

Elsen, Catherine ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > Composition architecturale

Language :

English

Title :

Re-imagining client learning and knowledge sharing of architectural services through a multi-layered journey map tool

Publication date :

10 January 2025

Journal title :

Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research

ISSN :

2631-6862

eISSN :

1938-7806

Publisher :

Emerald

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ARCH-05-2024-0211/full/xml

Available on ORBi :

since 29 January 2025

Statistics

Number of views

119 (9 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

39 (8 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Angral, A. (2019), “Architect–client relationship and value addition in private residential projects”, Archnet-IJAR, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 58-71, doi: 10.1108/ARCH-12-2018-0026.
Boehm, B. (1989), Software Risk Management, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA.
Boer, L., Donovan, J. and Buur, J. (2013), “Challenging industry conceptions with provotypes”, CoDesign, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 73-89, doi: 10.1080/15710882.2013.788193.
Bowen, S., Sustar, H., Wolstenholme, D. and Dearden, A. (2013), “Engaging teenagers productively in service design”, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1 Nos 3-4, pp. 71-81, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.02.001.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 77-10, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2019), “Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis”, Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 589-597, doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2021), “To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales”, Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 201-216, doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846.
Brondino, M., Dodero, G., Gennari, R., Melonio, A., Pasini, M., Raccanello, D. and Torello, S. (2015), “Emotions and inclusion in co-design at school: let's measure them!”, in Mascio, T., Gennari, R., Vittorini, P. and De la Prieta, F. (Eds), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing: Methodologies & Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol. 374, Springer, Cham, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19632-9_1.
Carlile, P.R. (2002), “A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development”, Organization Science, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 442-455, doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953.
Chiu, M.-L. (2002), “An organizational view of design communication in design collaboration”, Design Studies, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 187-210, doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00019-9.
Chuang, C.-L. and Chien, S.-F. (2021), “Facilitating architect-client communication in the pre-design phase”, PROJECTIONS, Proceedings of the 26th International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), Hong Kong, Vol. 2, pp. 71-80, doi: 10.52842/conf.caadria.2021.2.071.
Cummings, J. (2003), “Knowledge sharing: A review of the literature”, The World Bank Operations Evaluation Department, Washington, DC, Working Paper [82089].
Curtis, B., Krasner, H. and Iscoe, N. (1988), “A field study of the software design process for large systems”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 31 No. 11, pp. 1268-1287.
Dansoh, A. and Frimpong, S. (2016), “Client perspectives on relationships with architects on private house projects”, International Journal of Qualitative Research in Services, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 155-179, doi: 10.1504/IJQRS.2016.082643.
Defays, A. and Elsen, C. (2018), “Architecte et maître d’ouvrage: main dans la main, ou dos à dos”, Archinews, Vol. 18, pp. 15-21.
Diana, C., Pacenti, E. and Tassi, R. (2012), “Visualtiles Communication tools for (service) design”, Conference Proceedings ServDes. 2009, DeThinking Service ReThinking Design, Oslo Norway, 24-26 November 2009, Vol. 59, Linköping University Electronic Press, pp. 65-76.
Dzurilla, D., Sopher, H. and Dorta, T. (2023), “Architect-client communication during Co-ideation with 2D digital and 3D immersive sketches”, in eCAADe 2023: Digital Design Reconsidered, Graz, Austria, pp. 221-230.
European Council of Architects (2022), The Architectural Profession in Europe: 2022 Sector Study, Mirza & Nacey Research Ltd, West Sussex, available at: https://www.ace-cae.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/2022_Sector_Study_EN.pdf
Fragnière, E., Pellaton, C., Ramseyer, R., Sokhn, M. and Unternährer, C. (2021), “The Student Journey Map (SJM): a scenario-based approach to professionalizing digital education”, IEEE 8th International Conference on e-Learning in Industrial Electronics (ICELIE), Toronto, ON, Canada, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/ICELIE53900.2021.9765549.
Frayling, C. (1993), “Research in art and design”, Royal College of Art research papers, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1-5.
Gibbons, S. (2018), Journey Mapping 101, Nielsen Norman Group, available at: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/journey-mapping-101/ (accessed 12 January 2023).
Godin, D. and Zahedi, M. (2014), “Aspects of research through design: a literature review”, in Lim, Y., Niedderer, K., Redströ m, J., Stolterman, E. and Valtonen, A. (Eds), Design's Big Debates - DRS International Conference 2014, pp. 16-19, June, Umeå, Sweden, available at: https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2014/researchpapers/85
He, Q., Lianne, F.D. and Simonse, W.L. (2021), “A patient journey map to improve the home isolation experience of persons with mild COVID-19: design research for service touchpoints of artificial intelligence”, eHealth JMIR Med Inform, Vol. 9 No. 4, e23238, doi: 10.2196/29794.
Howard, T. (2014), “Journey mapping: a brief overview”, Communication Design Quarterly, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 10-13, doi: 10.1145/2644448.2644451.
Katić, E.K., Hmelo-Silver, C.E. and Weber, K.H. (2009), “Material mediation: tools and representations supporting collaborative problem‐solving discourse”, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 13-24.
Khaled, R. and Vasalou, A. (2014), “Bridging serious games and participatory design”, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 93-100, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.03.001.
Lallemand, C., Lauret, J. and Drouet, L. (2022), “Physical journey maps: staging users' experiences to increase stakeholders' empathy towards users”, Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '22), New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1-7, Article 344.
Lawrence, R.J. (1993), “Architectural design tools: simulation, communication and negotiation”, Design Studies, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 299-313, doi: 10.1016/0142-694X(93)80026-9.
Luck, R. and McDonnell, J. (2006), “Architect and user interaction: the spoken representation of form and functional meaning in early design conversations”, Design Studies, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 141-166, doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2005.09.001.
Macpherson, A., Jones, O. and Oakes, H. (2006), “Mediating artefacts, boundary objects and the social construction of knowledge”, The first international conference on organizational learning, knowledge and capabilities, OLKC. 2006, pp. 20-22.
Mahdavi, A., Feurer, S., Redlein, A. and Suter, G. (2003), “An inquiry into the building performance simulation tools usage by architects in Austria”, in Augenbroe, G. and Hensen, J. (Eds), Proceedings of the Building Simulation 2003: 8th Conference of IBPSA, Vol. 2, Eindhoven, pp. 777-784, doi: 10.26868/25222708.2007.0777-784.
Majchrzak, A., Beath, C.M., Lim, R.A. and Chin, W.W. (2005), “Managing client dialogues during information systems design to facilitate client learning”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 653-672, doi: 10.2307/25148704.
Malterud, K., Siersma, V.D. and Guassora, A.D. (2016), “Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power”, Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 26 No. 13, pp. 1753-1760, doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444.
McAvinia, C. (2016), ‘Activity Theory’, Online Learning and its Users: Lessons for Higher Education, Chandos Publishing, Kidlington, pp. 59-100.
McDonnell, J. (2009), “Collaborative negotiation in design: a study of design conversations between architect and building users”, CoDesign, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 35-50, doi: 10.1080/15710880802492862.
Mertens, A., Hamarat, Y. and Elsen, C. (2023), “Interactions between architects and end-users during housing design processes: a systematic literature review”, Archnet-IJAR, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 703-724, doi: 10.1108/ARCH-03-2022-0079.
Moretti, D.M., Baum, C.M., Wustmans, M. and Bröring, S. (2022), “Application of journey maps to the development of emergent sustainability‐oriented technologies: lessons for user involvement in agriculture”, Business Strategy and Development, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 209-221, doi: 10.1002/bsd2.192.
Nobre, H. and Faria, J. (2017), “Exploring marketing strategies in architectural services: the case of the architecture firms in Portugal”, International Journal of Business Excellence, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 275-293, doi: 10.1504/IJBEX.2017.084438.
Norouzi, N., Shabak, M., Embi, M.R.B. and Khan, T.H. (2015a), “The architect, the client and effective communication in architectural design practice”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 172, pp. 635-642, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.413.
Norouzi, N., Shabak, M., Embi, M.R.B. and Khan, T.H. (2015b), “A new insight into design approach with focus to architect-client relationship”, Asian Social Science, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 108-120, doi: 10.5539/ass.v11n5p108.
Parker, S. and Heapy, J. (2006), The Journey to the Interface: How Public Service Design Can Connect Users to Reform, Demos, London.
Pomeroy-Stevens, A., Afdhal, M., Mishra, N., Farnham Egan, K., Christianson, K. and Bachani, D. (2020), “Engaging citizens via journey maps to address urban health issues”, Environmental Health Insight, Vol. 14, pp. 1-9, doi: 10.1177/117863022096312.
Raposo, M., Eloy, S. and Dias, M.S. (2024), “Housing customization: envisioning an interface to support co-design processes”, Archnet-IJAR, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print, doi: 10.1108/ARCH-04-2024-0144.
Rosenbaum, M.S., Otalora, M.L. and Ramírez, G.C. (2017), “How to create a realistic customer journey map”, Business Horizons, Vol. 60 No. 1, pp. 143-150, doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2016.09.010.
Russell, D. (2002), “Looking beyond the interface: activity theory and distributed learning”, in Lea, M. and Nicoll, K. (Eds), Distributed Learning: Social and Cultural Approaches to Practice, London, Routledge Falmer, pp.64-82.
Russell, H., Aeli, R. and Niamh, M. (2017), Architect-client Interactions Research Project - Summary of Findings. The Bartlett School of Construction & Project Management, UCL, London.
Samuel, F. (2018), Why Architects Matter: Evidencing and Communicating the Value of Architects, Taylor & Francis, London.
Segelström, F. (2009), “Communicating through visualizations: service designers on visualizing user research”, Conference Proceedings ServDes. 2009, DeThinking Service ReThinking Design, Oslo Norway, 24-26 November 2009, Vol. 59, Linköping University Electronic Press, pp. 175-185.
Segelström, F. and Holmlid, S. (2009), “Visualizations as tools for research: service Designers on visualizations”, in Nordes 2009: Engaging Artifacts, The Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Oslo, Norway, pp. 1-9, 29 August - 01 September.
Segers, N.M., Achten, H.H., Timmermans, H.J.P., Vries and de, B. (2000), “A comparison of computer-aided tools for architectural design”, in Timmermans, H.J.P., Vries, B. and de (Eds), Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture; Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on Nijkerk, August 2000, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven/EIRASS, pp. 325-340.
Siva, J.P.S. and London, K. (2011), “Investigating the role of client learning for successful architect-client relationships on private single dwelling projects”, Architectural Engineering and Design Management, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 177-189, doi: 10.1080/17452007.2011.594570.
Smulders, F., Lousberg, L. and Dorst, K. (2008), “Towards different communication in collaborative design”, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 352-367, doi: 10.1108/17538370810883819.
Sperano, I., Roberge, J., Bénech, P., Trgalova, J. and Andruchow, R. (2019), “Exploring new usages of journey maps: introducing the pedagogical and the project planning journey maps”, in Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T. and Fujita, Y. (Eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), IEA 2018, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 824, pp. 964-982, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_99.
Star, S.L. and Griesemer, J.R. (1989), “Institutional ecology, translations' and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 387-420, 1907-39, doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001.
Taleb, H., Ismail, S., Wahab, M.H. and Rani, W.N.M.W.M. (2017), “Communication management between architects and clients”, The 2nd International Conference On Applied Science And Technology 2017 (ICAST’17), Kedah, Malaysia, Vol. 1891, 020136, doi: 10.1063/1.5005469.
Thompson, M. (2016), “Common pitfalls in customer journey maps”, Interactions, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 71-73, doi: 10.1145/3001753.
Tobar-Munoz, H., Baldiris, S. and Fabregat, R. (2016), “Co design of augmented reality game-based learning games with teachers using Co-CreaARGBL method”, IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 120-122, doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2016.32.
Weytjens, L., Verdonck, E. and Verbeeck, G. (2009), “Classification and use of design tools: the roles of tools in the architectural design process”, Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal - Annual Review, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 289-302, doi: 10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v03i01/37572.
Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Bidwell, N.J. and Blake, E. (2012), “Altering participation through interactions and reflections in design”, CoDesign, Vol. 8 Nos 2-3, pp. 163-182, doi: 10.1080/15710882.2012.672580.
Winter, S.J. and Butler, B.S. (2011), “Creating bigger problems: grand challenges as boundary objects and the legitimacy of the information systems field”, Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 99-108, doi: 10.1057/jit.2011.6.
Yönder, Ç., Hamarat, Y. and Elsen, C. (2023), “Les cartographies de parcours et leurs usages: revue systématique de la littérature [Journey maps and their use: a systematic review of the literature]”, ModACT 2023 [Online], doi: 10.25518/modact2023.64.
Yönder, Ç., Hamarat, Y. and Elsen, C. (2025a), “Connaissance et ses enjeux dans le co-design: implications méthodologiques [Matters of knowledge in co-design: methodological implications]”, Journal Sciences du Design, Vol. 21, Manuscript under review.
Yönder, Ç., Mertens, A., Castel, K., Heine, M. and Elsen, C. (2025b), “A review of tools supporting architect and user-client interactions”, Manuscript in preparation.
YouGov (2012), “An archi-what”, available at: https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/4265-archi-what (accessed 18 January 2024).