Article (Scientific journals)
Number of passes and outcome of endovascular treatment of anterior circulation large core ischemic stroke: insights from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry.
Lambrou, Victoria; Gory, Benjamin; Lapergue, Bertrand et al.
2024In Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, p. 2024-021857
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
jnis-2024-021857.full.pdf
Author postprint (683.26 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Stroke; Technique; Thrombectomy; Surgery; Neurology (clinical)
Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: The effect of multiple attempts on the outcome of endovascular treatment (EVT) of anterior circulation large ischemic core (LIC) stroke has not been fully explored. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry, a prospective, observational, multicenter study of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT at 21 centers in France between January 1, 2015 and June 31, 2023. We included patients with proximal intracranial occlusion and LIC defined as Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 0-5 up to 24 hours after last being seen well. We divided patients according to the number of passes with successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥2b) into seven groups, according to the corresponding number of passes. We compared them to the group of patients with unsuccessful reperfusion. RESULTS: A total of 1235 patients with LIC constituted the study cohort. The rate of a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 3 at 90 days was significantly higher for the one-pass successful recanalization category compared to no recanalization (48.1% vs 17.2%; adjusted OR (aOR) 7.99, 95% CI 4.30 to 14.8, P<0.001) and remained so even after six or more attempts (27.7% vs 17.2%; aOR 3.59, 95% CI 1.37 to 9.39, P=0.009). The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was lower for successful recanalization up to two passes (11.1% vs 18.8%; aOR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.69, P=0.002) without any significant differences for a higher number of passes. CONCLUSION: In anterior circulation LIC patients, successful reperfusion, even after six passes, is associated with favorable clinical outcomes with no increased hemorrhagic risk when compared to unsuccessful reperfusion.
Disciplines :
Neurology
Author, co-author :
Lambrou, Victoria;  Neuroradiology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessalonike, Kentrikḗ Makedonía, Greece
Gory, Benjamin;  Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, CHRU Nancy, Nancy, France
Lapergue, Bertrand;  Hôpital Foch Suresnes FR, University of Versailles Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
Marnat, Gaultier ;  Interventional and Diagnostic Neuroradiology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
Pop, Raoul ;  Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospitals Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ; Interventional Radiology, Institut de Chirurgie Guidée par l'Image, Strasbourg, France
Calviere, Lionel;  CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Anadani, Mohammad;  Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
Blanc, Raphael;  Interventional Neuroradiology, Fondation Rothschild, Paris, France
Finitsis, Stephanos Nikolaos ;  Neuroradiology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessalonike, Kentrikḗ Makedonía, Greece stefanosfin@yahoo.com
ETIS Study Group
Other collaborator :
Delvoye, François  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques
Language :
English
Title :
Number of passes and outcome of endovascular treatment of anterior circulation large core ischemic stroke: insights from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry.
Publication date :
30 May 2024
Journal title :
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
ISSN :
1759-8478
eISSN :
1759-8486
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, England
Pages :
jnis-2024-021857
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 20 January 2025

Statistics


Number of views
5 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
1

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi