Article (Scientific journals)
Assessing traditional and machine learning methods to smooth and impute device-based body condition score throughout the lactation in dairy cows
Chelotti, J.; Atashi, Hadi; Ferrero, M. et al.
2024In Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 227, p. 109599
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
kkk1-s2.0-S0168169924009906-main.pdf
Author postprint (4.17 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Body condition score; Dairy cows; Data imputation; Machine learning; Bi-directional; Dairy cattles; Dairy cow; Machine learning methods; Machine-learning; Performance; Root mean squared errors; Short term memory; Forestry; Agronomy and Crop Science; Computer Science Applications; Horticulture
Abstract :
[en] Regular monitoring of body condition score (BCS) changes during lactation is an essential management tool in dairy cattle; however, the current BCS measurements are often discontinuous and unevenly spaced in time. The imputation of BCS values is useful for two main reasons: i) achieving completeness of data is necessary to be able to relate BCS to other traits (e.g. milk yield and milk composition) that have been routinely recorded at different times and with a different frequency, and ii) having expected BCS values provides the possibility to trigger early warnings for animals with certain unexpected conditions. The contribution of this study was to propose and evaluate potential methods useful to smooth and impute device-based BCS values recorded during lactation in dairy cattle. In total, 26,207 BCS records were collected from 3,038 cows (9,199 and 14,462 BCS records on 1,546 Holstein and 1,211 Montbéliarde cows respectively, and the rest corresponded to other minority cattle breeds). Six methods were evaluated to predict BCS values: the traditional methods of test interval method (TIM), and multiple-trait procedure (MTP), and the machine learning (ML) methods of multi-layer perceptron (MLP), Elman network (Elman), long-short term memories (LSTM) and bi-directional LSTM (BiLSTM). The performance of each method was evaluated by a hold-out validation approach using statistics of the root mean squared error (RMSE) and Pearson correlation (r). TIM, MTP, MLP, and BiLSTM were assessed for the imputation of intermediate missing values, while MTP, Elman, and LSTM were evaluated for the forecasting of future BCS values. Regarding the machine learning methods, BiLSTM demonstrated the best performance for the intermediate value imputation task (RMSE = 0.295, r = 0.845), while LSTM demonstrated the best performance for the future value forecasting task (RMSE = 0.356, r = 0.751). Among the methods evaluated, MTP showed the best performance for imputation of intermediate missing values in terms of RMSE (0.288) and r (0.856). MTP also achieved the best performance for forecasting of future BCS values in terms of RMSE (0.348) and r (0.760). This study demonstrates the ability of MTP and machine learning methods to impute missing BCS data and provides a cost-effective solution for the application area.
Disciplines :
Animal production & animal husbandry
Author, co-author :
Chelotti, J.;  TERRA Teaching and Research Center, University of Liège, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (ULiège-GxABT), Gembloux, Belgium ; Instituto de Investigación en Señales, Sistemas e Inteligencia Computacional, sinc(i), FICH-UNL/CONICET, Santa Fe, Argentina
Atashi, Hadi  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Animal Sciences (AS) ; Department of Animal Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Ferrero, M.;  Instituto de Investigación en Señales, Sistemas e Inteligencia Computacional, sinc(i), FICH-UNL/CONICET, Santa Fe, Argentina
Grelet, C.;  Walloon Agricultural Research Center (CRA-W), Gembloux, Belgium
Soyeurt, Hélène  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Modélisation et développement
Giovanini, L.;  Instituto de Investigación en Señales, Sistemas e Inteligencia Computacional, sinc(i), FICH-UNL/CONICET, Santa Fe, Argentina
Rufiner, H.L.;  Instituto de Investigación en Señales, Sistemas e Inteligencia Computacional, sinc(i), FICH-UNL/CONICET, Santa Fe, Argentina ; Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos, Argentina
Gengler, Nicolas  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Animal Sciences (AS)
Language :
English
Title :
Assessing traditional and machine learning methods to smooth and impute device-based body condition score throughout the lactation in dairy cows
Publication date :
December 2024
Journal title :
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
ISSN :
0168-1699
eISSN :
1872-7107
Publisher :
Elsevier B.V.
Volume :
227
Pages :
109599
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
Interreg North-West Europe
Funding text :
Acknowledgment, The authors acknowledge the INTERREG NWE HappyMoo project, grant agreement NWE 730, co-financed by the Walloon Government (Service Public de Wallonie, Namur, Belgium). The providing of BCS data by the DHI organizations 3CE (Strasbourg, France) and Conseil \u00C9levage 25-90 (Roulans, France) is recognized. Nicolas Gengler, as a former senior research associate, acknowledges the support of the National Fund for Scientific Research (Brussels, Belgium) also through the grant no. T.0095.19 (PDR \u201CDEEPSELECT\u201D). The authors have not stated any conflicts of interest.The authors acknowledge the INTERREG NWE HappyMoo project, grant agreement NWE 730, co-financed by the Walloon Government ( Service Public de Wallonie , Namur, Belgium). The providing of BCS data by the DHI organizations 3CE (Strasbourg, France) and Conseil \u00C9levage 25-90 (Roulans, France) is recognized. Nicolas Gengler, as a former senior research associate, acknowledges the support of the National Fund for Scientific Research (Brussels, Belgium) also through the grant no. T.0095.19 (PDR \u201CDEEPSELECT\u201D). The authors have not stated any conflicts of interest.
Available on ORBi :
since 03 January 2025

Statistics


Number of views
8 (0 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
5 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi