Sexual Health and Quality of Life in Patients With Low-Risk Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Results From GCIG/CCTG CX.5/SHAPE Trial Comparing Simple Versus Radical Hysterectomy.
Ferguson, Sarah E; Brotto, Lori A; Kwon, Janiceet al.
2024 • In Journal of Clinical Oncology, p. 2400440
[en] [en] PURPOSE: Simple hysterectomy and pelvic node assessment (SHAPE) is a phase III randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01658930) reporting noninferiority of simple compared with radical hysterectomy for oncologic outcomes in low-risk cervical cancer. This study presents secondary outcomes of sexual health and quality of life (QOL) of the SHAPE trial.
METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive either radical or simple hysterectomy. Sexual health was assessed up to 36 months postoperatively using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised and QOL using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and Cervical Cancer-Specific Module (QLQ-CX24) questionnaires.
RESULTS: Among participants with at least one QOL measure, clinical and pathologic characteristics were balanced and with no differences in preoperative baseline scores for sexual health or QOL between groups. FSFI total score met the cutoff for dysfunction up to 6 months (P = .02) in the radical hysterectomy group. Group differences favored simple hysterectomy for FSFI subscales: desire and arousal at 3 months (P ≤ .001) and pain and lubrication up to 12 months (P ≤ .018). Both groups met the cutoff for sexual distress but was higher in radical hysterectomy at 3 months (P = .018). For QLQ-CX24, symptom experience was significantly better up to 24 months (P = .031) and body image better at 3, 24, and 36 months (P ≤ .01) for simple hysterectomy. Sexual-vaginal functioning was significantly better up to 24 months (P ≤ .022) and more sexual activity up to 36 months (P = .024) in the simple hysterectomy arm. Global health status was significantly higher at 36 months for simple hysterectomy (P = .025).
CONCLUSION: Simple hysterectomy was associated with lower rates of sexual dysfunction than radical hysterectomy, with a lower proportion of women having sustained sexual-vaginal dysfunction. These results further support the benefit of surgical de-escalation for low-risk cervical cancer.
Disciplines :
Reproductive medicine (gynecology, andrology, obstetrics) Oncology
Author, co-author :
Ferguson, Sarah E ; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Brotto, Lori A ; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Kwon, Janice ; University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Samouelian, Vanessa; Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Ferron, Gwenael; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
Maulard, Amandine; Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
Kroon, Cor de ; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
Driel, Willemien Van ; Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Tidy, John; Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Williamson, Karin; Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Mahner, Sven; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
Sexual Health and Quality of Life in Patients With Low-Risk Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Results From GCIG/CCTG CX.5/SHAPE Trial Comparing Simple Versus Radical Hysterectomy.
Publication date :
01 October 2024
Journal title :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
ISSN :
0732-183X
eISSN :
1527-7755
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), United States
Bakker RM, Kenter GG, Creutzberg CL, et al: Sexual distress and associated factors among cervical cancer survivors: A cross-sectional multicenter observational study. Psychooncology 26: 1470-1477, 2017
Kirchheiner K, Smet S, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, et al: Impact of vaginal symptoms and hormonal replacement therapy on sexual outcomes after definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: Results from the EMBRACE-I study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 112: 400-413, 2022
Park SY, Bae DS, Nam JH, et al: Quality of life and sexual problems in disease-free survivors of cervical cancer compared with the general population. Cancer 110: 2716-2725, 2007
Bergmark K, Åvall-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW, et al: Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 340: 1383-1389, 1999
Bae H, Park H,: Sexual function, depression, and quality of life in patients with cervical cancer. Support Care Cancer 24: 1277-1283, 2016
Biewenga P, van der Velden J, Mol BWJ, et al: Prognostic model for survival in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Cancer 117: 768-776, 2011
Frumovitz M, Sun CC, Schover LR, et al: Quality of life and sexual functioning in cervical cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 23: 7428-7436, 2005
Jensen PT, Groenvold M, Klee MC, et al: Early-stage cervical carcinoma, radical hysterectomy, and sexual function. A longitudinal study. Cancer 100: 97-106, 2004
Plante M, Kwon J, Ferguson S, et al: Simple versus radical hysterectomy in women with low risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 390: 819-829, 2024
Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al: The female sexual function index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26: 191-208, 2000
Baser RE, Li Y, Carter J,: Psychometric validation of the female sexual function index (FSFI) in cancer survivors. Cancer 118: 4606-4618, 2012
Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R,: The female sexual function index (FSFI): Cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther 31: 1-20, 2005
Derogatis LR, Rosen R, Leiblum S, et al: The female sexual distress scale (FSDS): Initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. J Sex Marital Ther 28: 317-330, 2002
DeRogatis L, Clayton A, Lewis-D'Agostino D, et al: Validation of the female sexual distress scale-revised for assessing distress in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Med 5: 357-364, 2008
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in Oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 365-376, 1993
Fayers P, Bottomley A,: Quality of life research within the EORTC-The EORTC QLQ-C30. Eur J Cancer 38: 125-133, 2002
Greimel ER, Kuljanic Vlasic K, Waldenstrom AC, et al: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life questionnaire cervical cancer module: EORTC QLQ-CX24. Cancer 107: 1812-1822, 2006
Singer S, Kuhnt S, Momenghalibaf A, et al: Patients' acceptance and psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-CX24 after surgery. Gynecol Oncol 116: 82-87, 2010
EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf
Stokes ME, Davis CS, Koch GG,: Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System (ed 2). Cary, NC, SAS Institute, 2000
Cohen J,: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (ed 2). New York, NY, Routledge, 1988, p 567
Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, et al: Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 16: 139-144, 1998
Butler-Manuel SA, Buttery LD, A'Hern RP, et al: Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical hysterectomy and simple hysterectomy: The nerve content of the uterine supporting ligaments. Cancer 89: 834-841, 2000
Bakker RM, Pieterse QD, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, et al: A controlled study on vaginal blood flow during sexual arousal among early-stage cervical cancer survivors treated with conventional radical or nerve-sparing surgery with or without radiotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 27: 1051-1057, 2017
Maas CP, Kenter GG, Trimbos JB, et al: Anatomical basis for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: Immunohistochemical study of the pelvic autonomic nerves. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84: 868-874, 2005
Kietpeerakool C, Aue-Aungkul A, Galaal K, et al: Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD012828, 2019
Brennen R, Lin KY, Denehy L, et al: The effect of pelvic floor muscle interventions on pelvic floor dysfunction after gynecological cancer treatment: A systematic review. Phys Ther 100: 1357-1371, 2020
Mohammadi Z, Maasoumi R, Vosoughi N, et al: The effect of the EX-PLISSIT model-based psychosexual counseling on improving sexual function and sexual quality of life in gynecologic cancer survivors: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Support Care Cancer 30: 9117-9126, 2022
Kovacevic N, Cilensek I, Merlo S, et al: Modern approach to the management of genitourinary syndrome in women with gynecological malignancies. Radiol Oncol 57: 292-298, 2023
Cusimano MC, Chiu M, Ferguson SE, et al: Association of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with all cause and cause specific mortality: Population based cohort study. BMJ 375: e067528, 2021