[en] In managed populations—whether for production or conservation—management practices can interfere with natural eco‐evolutionary processes, providing opportunities to mitigate immediate impacts of disturbances or enhance selection on tolerance traits. Here, we used a modelling approach to explore the interplay and feedback loops among drought regimes, natural selection and tree thinning in naturally regenerated monospecific forests. We conducted a simulation experiment spanning three nonoverlapping generations with the individual‐based demo‐genetic model Luberon2. Luberon2 integrates forest dynamics processes driving survival and mating success, including tree growth, competition, drought impacts and regeneration, with genetic variation in quantitative traits related to these processes. We focused on two variable traits: individual vigour, determining diameter growth potential without stress as the deviation from average stand growth, and individual sensitivity to drought stress as the slope of the relationship between diameter growth and drought stress level. We simulated simplified thinning scenarios, tailored to even‐aged stands. Considering plausible genetic variation and contrasting drought regimes, the predicted evolutionary rates for both traits aligned with documented rates in wild plant and animal populations. Thinning considerably reduced natural selective pressures caused by competition and drought compared to unthinned stands. However, the conventional thinning practice of retaining the larger trees resulted in indirect anthropogenic selection that enhanced genetic gain in vigour and lowered sensitivity by up to 30%. More intensive thinning aimed at reducing drought stress by reducing stand density hampered the selection against sensitivity to drought, potentially hindering long‐term adaptation. Conversely, avoiding the early, nonselective thinning step—thereby promoting both natural and anthropogenic selection—ultimately resulted in better stand performance while maintaining long‐term evolvability. This study emphasises the potential of evolution‐oriented forestry strategies to combine drought stress mitigation with genetic adaptation. It provides general insights into how population management, disturbance regimes and eco‐evolutionary responses interfere, aiding sustainable decision‐making amid environmental uncertainties.
Disciplines :
Environmental sciences & ecology
Author, co-author :
Fririon, Victor ; INRAE, UR 629 Ecologie des Forêts Méditerranéennes (URFM), Domaine Saint Paul–Site Agroparc Avignon France
Davi, Hendrik; INRAE, UR 629 Ecologie des Forêts Méditerranéennes (URFM), Domaine Saint Paul–Site Agroparc Avignon France
Oddou‐Muratorio, Sylvie ; INRAE, UR 629 Ecologie des Forêts Méditerranéennes (URFM), Domaine Saint Paul–Site Agroparc Avignon France ; INRAE, UMR 1224 Ecologie Comportementale et Biologie des Populations de Poissons (ECOBIOP), Aquapôle Saint‐Pée‐sur‐Nivelle France
Ligot, Gauthier ; Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Gestion des ressources forestières
Lefèvre, François ; INRAE, UR 629 Ecologie des Forêts Méditerranéennes (URFM), Domaine Saint Paul–Site Agroparc Avignon France
Language :
English
Title :
Can Thinning Foster Forest Genetic Adaptation to Drought? A Demo‐Genetic Modelling Approach With Disturbance Regimes
HE - 101081774 - OptFORESTS - Harnessing forest genetic resources for increasing options in the face of environmental and societal challenges H2020 - 773383 - B4EST - Adaptive BREEDING for productive, sustainable and resilient FORESTs under climate change
Funders :
EU - European Union
Funding text :
This work was funded by the European Union's research and innovation
programmes Horizon 2020, as part of the B4EST project (Grant No.
773383); Horizon Europe, as part of the OptFORESTS project (Grant No.
101081774); and by the French National Forests Office (ONF). We thank
our colleagues at ONF, Y. Rousselle, S. Fournier and T. Cordonnier, for
their comments and suggestions on the model. Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the authors only and do not necessarily
reflect those of the European Union. Neither the European Union nor
the granting authority can be held responsible for them.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Achim, A., G. Moreau, N. C. Coops, et al. 2022. “The Changing Culture of Silviculture.” Forestry 95, no. 2: 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpab047.
Aitken, S. N., and M. C. Whitlock. 2013. “Assisted Gene Flow to Facilitate Local Adaptation to Climate Change.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 44: 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135747.
Alberto, F. J., S. N. Aitken, R. Alía, et al. 2013. “Potential for Evolutionary Responses to Climate Change—Evidence From Tree Populations.” Global Change Biology 19, no. 6: 1645–1661. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12181.
Alfaro, R. I., B. Fady, G. G. Vendramin, et al. 2014. “The Role of Forest Genetic Resources in Responding to Biotic and Abiotic Factors in the Context of Anthropogenic Climate Change.” Forest Ecology and Management 333: 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.006.
Aluome, C., S. Martel, C. Moisy, and D. Loustau. 2019. “Le Projet Forêts-21.” https://forets21.inra.fr/pelican3.1/.
Banks, S. C., G. J. Cary, A. L. Smith, et al. 2013. “How Does Ecological Disturbance Influence Genetic Diversity?” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28, no. 11: 670–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.08.005.
Bansal, S., C. A. Harrington, and J. B. St. Clair. 2016. “Tolerance to Multiple Climate Stressors: A Case Study of Douglas-Fir Drought and Cold Hardiness.” Ecology and Evolution 6, no. 7: 2074–2083. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2007.
Bennett, A. C., N. G. McDowell, C. D. Allen, and K. J. Anderson-Teixeira. 2015. “Larger Trees Suffer Most during Drought in Forests Worldwide.” Nature Plants 1, no. 10: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2015.139.
Bone, E., and A. Farres. 2001. “Trends and Rates of Microevolution in Plants.” Genetica 112, no. 1: 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013378014069.
Bonnet, T., M. B. Morrissey, P. de Villemereuil, et al. 2022. “Genetic Variance in Fitness Indicates Rapid Contemporary Adaptive Evolution in Wild Animals.” Science 376, no. 6596: 1012–1016. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk0853.
Bréda, N., A. Granier, and G. Aussenac. 1995. “Effects of Thinning on Soil and Tree Water Relations, Transpiration and Growth in an Oak Forest (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.).” Tree Physiology 15, no. 5: 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/15.5.295.
Brunet-Navarro, P., F. J. Sterck, J. Vayreda, J. Martinez-Vilalta, and G. M. J. Mohren. 2016. “Self-Thinning in Four Pine Species: An Evaluation of Potential Climate Impacts.” Annals of Forest Science 73, no. 4: 1025–1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-016-0585-y.
Bugmann, H. K. M. 1996. “A Simplified Forest Model to Study Species Composition Along Climate Gradients.” Ecology 77, no. 7: 2055–2074. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265700.
Cailleret, M., M. Nourtier, A. Amm, M. Durand-Gillmann, and H. Davi. 2014. “Drought-Induced Decline and Mortality of Silver Fir Differ Among Three Sites in Southern France.” Annals of Forest Science 71, no. 6: 643–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0265-0.
Carlson, S. M., C. J. Cunningham, and P. A. H. Westley. 2014. “Evolutionary Rescue in a Changing World.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29, no. 9: 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.06.005.
Chianucci, F., L. Salvati, T. Giannini, U. Chiavetta, P. Corona, and A. Cutini. 2016. “Long-Term Response to Thinning in a Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Coppice Stand Under Conversion to High Forest in Central Italy.” Silva Fennica 50, no. 3: 1549. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1549.
Curtis, R. O. 1982. “A Simple Index of Stand Density for Douglas-Fir.” Forest Science 28, no. 1: 92–94.
Curtis, R. O., and D. D. Marshall. 2000. “Technical Note: Why Quadratic Mean Diameter?” Western Journal of Applied Forestry 15, no. 3: 137–139. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/15.3.137.
Davi, H., and M. Cailleret. 2017. “Assessing Drought-Driven Mortality Trees With Physiological Process-Based Models.” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 232: 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.08.019.
Deleuze, C., O. Pain, J.-F. Dhôte, and J.-C. Hervé. 2004. “A Flexible Radial Increment Model for Individual Trees in Pure Even-Aged Stands.” Annals of Forest Science 61, no. 4: 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2004026.
Depardieu, C., M. P. Girardin, S. Nadeau, P. Lenz, J. Bousquet, and N. Isabel. 2020. “Adaptive Genetic Variation to Drought in a Widely Distributed Conifer Suggests a Potential for Increasing Forest Resilience in a Drying Climate.” New Phytologist 227, no. 2: 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16551.
DeSoto, L., M. Cailleret, F. Sterck, et al. 2020. “Low Growth Resilience to Drought Is Related to Future Mortality Risk in Trees.” Nature Communications 11, no. 1: 545. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14300-5.
Dufrêne, E., H. Davi, C. François, G. le Maire, V. Le Dantec, and A. Granier. 2005. “Modelling Carbon and Water Cycles in a Beech Forest.” Ecological Modelling 185, no. 2–4: 407–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.004.
Duncker, P., K. Raulund-Rasmussen, P. Gundersen, et al. 2012. “How Forest Management Affects Ecosystem Services, Including Timber Production and Economic Return: Synergies and Trade-Offs.” Ecology and Society 17: 50. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05066-170450.
Forrester, D. I., T. G. Baker, S. R. Elms, et al. 2021. “Self-Thinning Tree Mortality Models That Account for Vertical Stand Structure, Species Mixing and Climate.” Forest Ecology and Management 487: 118936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.118936.
Forrester, D. I., J. J. Collopy, C. L. Beadle, C. R. Warren, and T. G. Baker. 2012. “Effect of Thinning, Pruning and Nitrogen Fertiliser Application on Transpiration, Photosynthesis and Water-Use Efficiency in a Young Eucalyptus nitens Plantation.” Forest Ecology and Management 266: 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.019.
Fririon, V., H. Davi, S. Oddou-Muratorio, F. Lebourgeois, and F. Lefèvre. 2023. “Within and Between Population Phenotypic Variation in Growth Vigor and Sensitivity to Drought Stress in Five Temperate Tree Species.” Forest Ecology and Management 531: 120754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120754.
Gavinet, J., J.-M. Ourcival, J. Gauzere, L. García de Jalón, and J.-M. Limousin. 2020. “Drought Mitigation by Thinning: Benefits From the Stem to the Stand Along 15 Years of Experimental Rainfall Exclusion in a Holm Oak Coppice.” Forest Ecology and Management 473: 118266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118266.
Gingerich, P. D. 1993. “Quantification and Comparison of Evolutionary Rates.” American Journal of Science 293, no. A: 453–478. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.293.A.453.
Gingerich, P. D. 2009. “Rates of Evolution.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40, no. 1: 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173457.
Gloy, J., U. Herzschuh, and S. Kruse. 2023. “Evolutionary Adaptation of Trees and Modelled Future Larch Forest Extent in Siberia.” Ecological Modelling 478: 110278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110278.
Godineau, C., V. Fririon, N. Beudez, et al. 2023. “A Demo-Genetic Model Shows How Silviculture Reduces Natural Density-Dependent Selection in Tree Populations.” Evolutionary Applications 16, no. 11: 1830–1844. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13606.
Gomulkiewicz, R., and R. D. Holt. 1995. “When Does Evolution by Natural Selection Prevent Extinction?” Evolution 49, no. 1: 201–207.
Govaert, L., E. A. Fronhofer, S. Lion, et al. 2019. “Eco-Evolutionary Feedbacks—Theoretical Models and Perspectives.” Functional Ecology 33, no. 1: 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13241.
Gwaze, D. P., F. E. Bridgwater, T. D. Byram, J. A. Woolliams, and C. G. Williams. 2000. “Predicting Age-Age Genetic Correlations in Tree-Breeding Programs: A Case Study of Pinus taeda L.” Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100, no. 2: 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050027.
Hendry, A. P. 2017. Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hendry, A. P., T. J. Farrugia, and M. T. Kinnison. 2008. “Human Influences on Rates of Phenotypic Change in Wild Animal Populations.” Molecular Ecology 17, no. 1: 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03428.x.
Jactel, H., B. C. Nicoll, M. Branco, et al. 2009. “The Influences of Forest Stand Management on Biotic and Abiotic Risks of Damage.” Annals of Forest Science 66, no. 7: 701. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009054.
Jansson, G., J. K. Hansen, M. Haapanen, H. Kvaalen, and A. Steffenrem. 2017. “The Genetic and Economic Gains From Forest Tree Breeding Programmes in Scandinavia and Finland.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 32, no. 4: 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2016.1242770.
Kleinhentz, M., H. Jactel, and A. Raffin. 1998. “Genetic Parameters and Gain Expected From Direct Selection for Resistance to Dioryctria sylvestrella Ratz. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Pinus pinaster Ait., Using a Full Diallel Mating Design.” International Journal of Forest Genetics 5: 147–154.
Lamarins, A., V. Fririon, D. Folio, et al. 2022. “Importance of Interindividual Interactions in Eco-Evolutionary Population Dynamics: The Rise of Demo-Genetic Agent-Based Models.” Evolutionary Applications 15, no. 12: 1988–2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13508.
Lefèvre, F., T. Boivin, A. Bontemps, et al. 2014. “Considering Evolutionary Processes in Adaptive Forestry.” Annals of Forest Science 71, no. 7: 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0272-1.
Legay, M., C. Bastien, J. C. Bastien, et al. 2015. “Adaptation: Vers Un Enrichissement Du Dialogue Recherche-Gestion.” Innovations Agronomiques 47: 121–130. https://doi.org/10.15454/1.462269223291339E12.
Ligot, G., T. Gheysen, J. Perin, et al. 2023. “From the Simulation of Forest Plantation Dynamics to the Quantification of Bark-Stripping Damage by Ungulates.” European Journal of Forest Research 142: 899–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-023-01565-w.
Lytle, D. A. 2001. “Disturbance Regimes and Life-History Evolution.” American Naturalist 157, no. 5: 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1086/319930.
Mäkinen, H., and A. Isomäki. 2004. “Thinning Intensity and Growth of Scots Pine Stands in Finland.” Forest Ecology and Management 201, no. 2: 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.016.
Malíková, L., V. Latzel, P. Šmilauer, and J. Klimešová. 2016. “Local Adaptation of Annual Weed Populations to Habitats Differing in Disturbance Regime.” Evolutionary Ecology 30, no. 5: 861–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-016-9845-4.
Mauri, A., G. Strona, and J. San-Miguel-Ayanz. 2017. “EU-Forest, a High-Resolution Tree Occurrence Dataset for Europe.” Scientific Data 4, no. 1: 160123. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.123.
Metz, J., P. Annighöfer, P. Schall, et al. 2016. “Site-Adapted Admixed Tree Species Reduce Drought Susceptibility of Mature European Beech.” Global Change Biology 22, no. 2: 903–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13113.
Montwé, D., H. Spiecker, and A. Hamann. 2015. “Five Decades of Growth in a Genetic Field Trial of Douglas-Fir Reveal Trade-Offs Between Productivity and Drought Tolerance.” Tree Genetics & Genomes 11, no. 2: 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-015-0854-1.
Moran, E., J. Lauder, C. Musser, A. Stathos, and M. Shu. 2017. “The Genetics of Drought Tolerance in Conifers.” New Phytologist 216, no. 4: 1034–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14774.
Moreau, G., C. Chagnon, A. Achim, et al. 2022. “Opportunities and Limitations of Thinning to Increase Resistance and Resilience of Trees and Forests to Global Change.” Forestry 95: 595–615. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpac010.
Nicotra, A. B., O. K. Atkin, S. P. Bonser, et al. 2010. “Plant Phenotypic Plasticity in a Changing Climate.” Trends in Plant Science 15, no. 12: 684–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008.
Nyland, R. D., L. S. Kenefic, K. K. Bohn, and S. L. Stout. 2016. Silviculture: Concepts and Applications, Third Edition. 3rd ed. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press Inc.
Oddou-Muratorio, S., H. Davi, and F. Lefèvre. 2020. “Integrating Evolutionary, Demographic and Ecophysiological Processes to Predict the Adaptive Dynamics of Forest Tree Populations Under Global Change.” Tree Genetics & Genomes 16, no. 5: 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-020-01451-1.
Paenke, I., B. Sendhoff, and T. J. Kawecki. 2007. “Influence of Plasticity and Learning on Evolution Under Directional Selection.” American Naturalist 170, no. 2: E47–E58. https://doi.org/10.1086/518952.
Pelletier, F., D. Garant, and A. P. Hendry. 2009. “Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, no. 1523: 1483–1489. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0027.
Perin, J., H. Claessens, P. Lejeune, Y. Brostaux, and J. Hébert. 2017. “Distance-Independent Tree Basal Area Growth Models for Norway Spruce, Douglas-Fir and Japanese Larch in Southern Belgium.” European Journal of Forest Research 136, no. 2: 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-016-1019-y.
Perin, J., J. Hébert, Y. Brostaux, P. Lejeune, and H. Claessens. 2013. “Modelling the Top-Height Growth and Site Index of Norway Spruce in Southern Belgium.” Forest Ecology and Management 298: 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.009.
Perin, J., J. Hebert, P. Lejeune, and H. Claessens. 2016. “De nouvelles normes sylvicoles pour les futaies pures équiennes d'épicéa et de douglas en appui à la gestion de la forêt publique en Wallonie.” Forêt Wallonne Asbl. https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/234913.
Peterson, D. L., M. C. Johnson, J. K. Agee, T. B. Jain, D. McKenzie, and E. D. Reinhardt. 2005. Forest Structure and Fire Hazard in Dry Forests of the Western United States. PNW-GTR-628. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-628.
Petit, S., and H. Claessens. 2013. “La régénération naturelle des douglasaies a le vent en poupe. Le point sur les itinéraires techniques existants.” Forêt Wallonne 13.
Petit-Cailleux, C., H. Davi, F. Lefèvre, et al. 2021. “Tree Mortality Risks Under Climate Change in Europe: Assessment of Silviculture Practices and Genetic Conservation Networks.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9: 706414. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.706414.
Rodríguez de Prado, D., R. San Martín, F. Bravo, and C. Herrero de Aza. 2020. “Potential Climatic Influence on Maximum Stand Carrying Capacity for 15 Mediterranean Coniferous and Broadleaf Species.” Forest Ecology and Management 460: 117824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117824.
Schelhaas, M. J. 2008. “The Wind Stability of Different Silvicultural Systems for Douglas-Fir in The Netherlands: A Model-Based Approach.” Forestry 81, no. 3: 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpn028.
Schmitt, A., R. Trouvé, I. Seynave, and F. Lebourgeois. 2020. “Decreasing Stand Density Favors Resistance, Resilience, and Recovery of Quercus petraea Trees to a Severe Drought, Particularly on Dry Sites.” Annals of Forest Science 77, no. 2: 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-00959-9.
Schueler, S., J.-P. George, S. Karanitsch-Ackerl, K. Mayer, R. T. Klumpp, and M. Grabner. 2021. “Evolvability of Drought Response in Four Native and Non-Native Conifers: Opportunities for Forest and Genetic Resource Management in Europe.” Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 648312. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.648312.
Seidl, R., D. Thom, M. Kautz, et al. 2017. “Forest Disturbances under Climate Change.” Nature Climate Change 7, no. 6: 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3303.
Sergent, A.-S. 2011. “Diversité de la réponse au déficit hydrique et vulnérabilité au dépérissement du douglas.” PhD diss., Université d'Orléans. https://hal.inrae.fr/tel-02811194.
Sergio, F., J. Blas, and F. Hiraldo. 2018. “Animal Responses to Natural Disturbance and Climate Extremes: A Review.” Global and Planetary Change 161: 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.009.
Smith, N. J. 1993. “Estimating Leaf Area Index and Light Extinction Coefficients in Stands of Douglas-Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii).” Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23, no. 2: 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1139/x93-043.
Sohn, J. A., F. Hartig, M. Kohler, J. Huss, and J. Bauhus. 2016. “Heavy and Frequent Thinning Promotes Drought Adaptation in Pinus sylvestris Forests.” Ecological Applications 26, no. 7: 2190–2205. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1373.
Sohn, J. A., S. Saha, and J. Bauhus. 2016. “Potential of Forest Thinning to Mitigate Drought Stress: A Meta-Analysis.” Forest Ecology and Management 380: 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.07.046.
Tague, C. L., and M. A. Moritz. 2019. “Plant Accessible Water Storage Capacity and Tree-Scale Root Interactions Determine How Forest Density Reductions Alter Forest Water Use and Productivity.” Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 2: 36. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2019.00036.
Tainter, F. H., and F. A. Baker. 1996. Principles of Forest Pathology. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Tonnabel, J., T. J. M. Van Dooren, J. Midgley, et al. 2012. “Optimal Resource Allocation in a Serotinous Non-Resprouting Plant Species Under Different Fire Regimes.” Journal of Ecology 100, no. 6: 1464–1474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.02023.x.
Wainhouse, D. 2005. Ecological Methods in Forest Pest Management. Oxford, UK: OUP.
Wang, Y., X. Wei, A. D. del Campo, et al. 2019. “Juvenile Thinning Can Effectively Mitigate the Effects of Drought on Tree Growth and Water Consumption in a Young Pinus contorta Stand in the Interior of British Columbia, Canada.” Forest Ecology and Management 454: 117667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117667.
White, P. S., and A. Jentsch. 2001. “The Search for Generality in Studies of Disturbance and Ecosystem Dynamics.” In Progress in Botany, edited by K. Esser, U. Lüttge, J. W. Kadereit, and W. Beyschlag, vol. 62, 399–450. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56849-7_17.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
