Efficacy and safety of candidate biosimilar CT-P41 versus reference denosumab: a double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, Phase 3 trial in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Biosimilar; CT-P41; Denosumab; Equivalence; Osteoporosis; Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Abstract :
[en] [en] UNLABELLED: This 78-week (18-month) study conducted in 479 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis evaluated the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of candidate biosimilar CT-P41 relative to US reference denosumab. CT-P41 had equivalent efficacy and pharmacodynamics to US-denosumab, with similar pharmacokinetics and comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles.
PURPOSE: To demonstrate equivalence of candidate biosimilar CT-P41 and US reference denosumab (US-denosumab) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
METHODS: This 78-week (18-month), double-blind, randomized, active-controlled Phase 3 study (NCT04757376) comprised two treatment periods (TPs). In TPI, patients (N = 479) were randomized 1:1 to 60 mg subcutaneous CT-P41 or US-denosumab. At Week 52, those who had received CT-P41 in TPI continued to do so. Those who had received US-denosumab were randomized (1:1) to continue treatment or switch to CT-P41 in TPII. The primary efficacy endpoint was percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density at Week 52. Efficacy equivalence was concluded if associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) for least squares (LS) mean group differences fell within ± 1.503%. The primary pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoint was area under the effect curve for serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen through the first 26 weeks, with an equivalence margin of 80-125% (for 95% CIs associated with geometric LS mean ratios).
RESULTS: Equivalence was demonstrated for CT-P41 and US-denosumab with respect to primary efficacy (LS mean difference [95% CI]: - 0.139 [- 0.826, 0.548] in the full analysis set and - 0.280 [- 0.973, 0.414] in the per-protocol set) and PD (geometric LS mean ratio [95% CI]: 94.94 [90.75, 99.32]) endpoints. Secondary efficacy, PD, pharmacokinetics, and safety results were comparable among all groups up to Week 78, including after transitioning to CT-P41 from US-denosumab.
CONCLUSIONS: CT-P41 was equivalent to US-denosumab in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, with respect to primary efficacy and PD endpoints.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
Reginster, Jean-Yves ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique ; College of Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Czerwinski, Edward; Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne, Kraków, Poland
Wilk, Krzysztof; Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne, Kraków, Poland
Borowy, Przemysław; Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne, Kraków, Poland
Strzelecka, Anna; Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland
Budlewski, Tomasz; Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland
Janowska-Maus, Monika; Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland
Szymanowski, Krzysztof ; Department of Perinatology and Gynaecology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
Kwiatek, Joanna; Centrum Medyczne Pratia Poznań, Poznań, Poland
Postol, Svitlana; Medical Center of Medbud - Clinic LLC, Kyiv, Ukraine
Põder, Airi; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinical Research Centre Ltd, Tartumaa, Estonia
Supronik, Jerzy; Nzoz Osteo-Medic S.C. Artur Racewicz, Białystok, Poland
Kim, SungHyun; Celltrion, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea
Suh, JeeHye; Celltrion, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea
Han, NooRi; Celltrion, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea
Kim, NaHyun; Celltrion, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea
Bae, SeoHee; Celltrion, Inc., Incheon, Republic of Korea
Silverman, Stuart L ; OMC Clinical Research Center and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8641 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 301, Beverly Hills, CA, 90211, USA. stuarts@bhillsra.com
Efficacy and safety of candidate biosimilar CT-P41 versus reference denosumab: a double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, Phase 3 trial in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Publication date :
23 July 2024
Journal title :
Osteoporosis International
ISSN :
0937-941X
eISSN :
1433-2965
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, England
We thank all patients and investigators involved in the study. Medical writing support, including development of a draft outline and subsequent drafts in consultation with the authors, collating author comments, copyediting, fact checking, and referencing, was provided by Samantha Booth, PhD, at Aspire Scientific Limited (Bollington, UK). Funding for medical writing support for this article was provided by Celltrion, Inc. (Incheon, Republic of Korea).
N. Salari H. Ghasemi L. Mohammadi M.H. Behzadi E. Rabieenia S. Shohaimi M. Mohammadi The global prevalence of osteoporosis in the world: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis J Orthop Surg Res 2021 16 609 10.1186/s13018-021-02772-0 34657598 8522202
F. Borgström L. Karlsson G. Ortsäter et al. Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities Arch Osteoporos 2020 15 59 10.1007/s11657-020-0706-y 32306163 7166207
U. Tarantino I. Cariati C. Greggi et al. Gaps and alternative surgical and non-surgical approaches in the bone fragility management: an updated review Osteoporos Int 2022 33 2467 2478 10.1007/s00198-022-06482-z 35851407
S.A. Williams S.G. Daigle R. Weiss Y. Wang T. Arora J.R. Curtis Economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the US Medicare population Ann Pharmacother 2021 55 821 829 10.1177/1060028020970518 33148010
E.D. Deeks Denosumab: a review in postmenopausal osteoporosis Drugs Aging 2018 35 163 173 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXjvF2iu74%3D 10.1007/s40266-018-0525-7 29435849
Amgen Inc. (2024) Prolia®: prescribing information. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2024/125320s216lbl.pdf. Accessed 26 Jun 2024
Amgen Europe BV (2020) Prolia®: summary of product characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/prolia-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed 26 Jun 2024
E.C.-C. Lai T.-C. Lin J.L. Lange L. Chen I.C.K. Wong C.W. Sing C.L. Cheung S.C. Shao Y.K. Yang Effectiveness of denosumab for fracture prevention in real-world postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a retrospective cohort study Osteoporos Int 2022 33 1155 1164 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XosFaju7Y%3D 10.1007/s00198-021-06291-w 35032187 9007768
Y. Chen J. Zhu Y. Zhou J. Peng B. Wang Efficacy and safety of denosumab in osteoporosis or low bone mineral density postmenopausal women Front Pharmacol 2021 12 588095 10.3389/fphar.2021.588095 33935694 8080120
H.G. Bone R.B. Wagman M.L. Brandi et al. 10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extension Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017 5 513 523 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXhvFOhsLzM 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30138-9 28546097
T.K. Kvien K. Patel V. Strand The cost savings of biosimilars can help increase patient access and lift the financial burden of health care systems Semin Arthritis Rheum 2022 52 151939 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XhtVyhtrnL 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.11.009 35027243
A. Busse D. Lüftner What does the pipeline promise about upcoming biosimilar antibodies in oncology? Breast Care (Basel) 2019 14 10 16 10.1159/000496834 31019437
F.C. Araújo J. Gonçalves J.E. Fonseca Biosimilars in rheumatology Pharmacol Res 2019 149 104467 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104467 31568820
US Food and Drug Administration (2024) FDA approves first interchangeable biosimilars to Prolia and Xgeva to treat certain types of osteoporosis and prevent bone events in cancer. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-human-drugs/fda-approves-first-interchangeable-biosimilars-prolia-and-xgeva-treat-certain-types-osteoporosis-and. Accessed 26 Jun 2024
European Pharmaceutical Review (2024) European Commission grants first-of-a-kind biosimilar approval By Catherine Eckford. News. https://www.europeanpharmaceuticalreview.com/news/229320/european-commission-grants-first-of-a-kind-biosimilar-approval/
A. Jamshidi M. Vojdanian M. Soroush et al. Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) compared to the reference product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, and noninferiority clinical trial Arthritis Res Ther 2022 24 161 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XhvFGru77P 10.1186/s13075-022-02840-8 35773713 9245232
H. Zhang J.-M. Gu A.-J. Chao et al. A phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the denosumab biosimilar QL1206 in postmenopausal Chinese women with osteoporosis and high fracture risk Acta Pharmacol Sin 2023 44 446 453 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XhvFGqt7bJ 10.1038/s41401-022-00954-y 35896694
J. Gu H. Zhang Q. Xue et al. Denosumab biosimilar (LY06006) in Chinese postmenopausal osteoporotic women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III study J Orthop Translat 2022 38 117 125 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3sXhtFyrtL8%3D 10.1016/j.jot.2022.06.007 36381249 9633870
A. Kim J.H. Hong W. Shin et al. A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, phase 1 study comparing the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity of denosumab biosimilar CT-P41 and reference denosumab in healthy males Expert Opin Biol Ther 2024 22 1 9
US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement JAMA 2018 319 2521 2531 10.1001/jama.2018.7498
J.A. Kanis C. Cooper R. Rizzoli J.-Y. Reginster European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women Osteoporos Int 2019 30 3 44 1:STN:280:DC%2BB3czps1KrsQ%3D%3D 10.1007/s00198-018-4704-5 30324412
S.R. Cummings J. San Martin M.R. McClung et al. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis N Engl J Med 2009 361 756 765 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtVWls7nF 10.1056/NEJMoa0809493 19671655
H.G. Bone M.A. Bolognese C.K. Yuen D.L. Kendler H. Wang Y. Liu J. San Martin Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008 93 2149 2157 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXntFamtrg%3D 10.1210/jc.2007-2814 18381571
R. Eastell C. Christiansen A. Grauer et al. Effects of denosumab on bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis J Bone Miner Res 2011 26 530 537 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXjt1Wqsb8%3D 10.1002/jbmr.251 20839290
M.J. Gillett S.D. Vasikaran C.A. Inderjeeth The role of PINP in diagnosis and management of metabolic bone disease Clin Biochem Rev 2021 42 3 10 10.33176/AACB-20-0001 34305208 8252919