Article (Scientific journals)
Cost–Benefit Analysis of Mulch Film Management and Its Policy Implications in Northern China
Hao, Aibo; Yin, Changbin; Léonard, Angélique et al.
2024In Agriculture, 14 (7), p. 1081
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
agriculture.pdf
Publisher postprint (5.72 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
biodegradable mulch film; cost–benefit analysis; mulch film management; policy implication; thicker mulch film
Abstract :
[en] Agricultural white pollution is a pressing concern in China. However, the efficiency and rationality of the government’s subsidies for mulch film management remain ambiguous. To formulate reasonable policies for mulch film management and optimize fiscal resource allocation, the study employs cost–benefit analysis to evaluate the economic performance of mulch film management. Two environmentally friendly measures being primarily proposed in China, namely the application of thicker mulch film (hereinafter referred to as thicker film) and the substitution of biodegradable mulch film (hereinafter referred to as biodegradable film), are selected for analysis, with conventional mulch film (hereinafter referred to as conventional film) serving as the benchmark for comparison. Primary data obtained through field surveys, supplemented by secondary data from national statistics, industry reports, and literature reviews, are used for the study. Results show that thicker film application is cost-effective, with a net benefit of CNY 3208.8/ha (USD 449.2/ha; 1 CNY = 0.14 USD), which is CNY 253.8/ha (USD 35.5/ha) higher than that of conventional film. The net benefit for biodegradable film application is lower than that for conventional film, at CNY 2244.6/ha (USD 314.2/ha). The results reveal the significant potential of promoting the use of thicker film due to its recycling and economic advantages. Findings imply that the further promotion of its use lies in improving farmers’ cognition and optimizing subsidy dimensions to allocate government financial resources more effectively. On the contrary, biodegradable film utilization is unprofitable and relies on continuous external subsidies. The government can optimize the subsidy standard based on the cost–benefit performance of different mulch films applied and provide incentives to promote cost reductions and efficiency increases. Further analysis indicates that sustainable mulch film management entails developing mechanisms to internalize the external benefits of management and innovating a new governance landscape.
Disciplines :
Agriculture & agronomy
Author, co-author :
Hao, Aibo  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre ; State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
Yin, Changbin ;  State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China ; Research Center for Agricultural Green Development in China, Beijing, China
Léonard, Angélique  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Department of Chemical Engineering > PEPs - Products, Environment, and Processes
Dogot, Thomas  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > TERRA Research Centre > Modélisation et développement
Language :
English
Title :
Cost–Benefit Analysis of Mulch Film Management and Its Policy Implications in Northern China
Publication date :
05 July 2024
Journal title :
Agriculture
eISSN :
2077-0472
Publisher :
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Volume :
14
Issue :
7
Pages :
1081
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funding number :
18ZDA048
Funding text :
This research was funded by the Major Program of National Social Science Foundation of China, grant number 18ZDA048.
Available on ORBi :
since 15 November 2024

Statistics


Number of views
13 (1 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
2
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
2
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
1

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi