Article (Scientific journals)
Response to "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?": Balancing Perspectives: The Significance of Empirical Evidence in Scientific Inquiry [Letter to the Editor]
Martial, Charlotte; Fritz, Pauline; Gosseries, Olivia
2024In Journal of Near-Death Studies
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
24 Editorial Martial et al. v5 Jan.pdf
Author postprint (160.1 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] In this response, we explain why we believe it is premature for the International Association for Near-Death Studies (IANDS) to endorse a postphysicalist worldview.
Disciplines :
Neurosciences & behavior
Author, co-author :
Martial, Charlotte  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA Consciousness - Coma Science Group
Fritz, Pauline  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA Consciousness - Coma Science Group
Gosseries, Olivia  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA > GIGA Consciousness - Coma Science Group
Language :
English
Title :
Response to "Should IANDS Endorse a Post-Physicalist Worldview?": Balancing Perspectives: The Significance of Empirical Evidence in Scientific Inquiry [Letter to the Editor]
Publication date :
December 2024
Journal title :
Journal of Near-Death Studies
ISSN :
0891-4494
Publisher :
International Association for Near-Death Studies, United States
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 25 October 2024

Statistics


Number of views
49 (7 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
5 (5 by ULiège)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi