[en] The literature on sound production behaviours in fish in the wild is quite sparse. In several taxa, associations between different sound types and given behaviours have been reported. In the Holocentridae, past nomenclature of the different sound types (knocks, growls, grunts, staccatos and thumps) has been confusing because it relies on the use of several terms that are not always based on fine descriptions. Our study aims to ascertain whether holocentrids can produce a variety of sounds in the wild and if these sounds are associated with specific behaviours. Additionally, we aim to determine whether sounds produced by hand-held specimens, a common methodology to record sounds in standardised conditions in fishes, could correspond to some sounds produced by free-swimming individuals in natural conditions. Our study shows that all holocentrid species are able to produce sounds in 6 behavioural contexts of both agonistic (conspecific and heterospecific chases, competition) and social signalling types (acceleration, broadcasting, body quivering), in addition to previously described mobbing towards moray eels and symbiotic interactions with cleaner wrasses. In holocentrids, acoustic communication is not only based on single calls but can also involve series of sounds of different types that are arranged randomly. The large amount of combinations within acoustical events for each behaviour, resulting from both the quantity of sounds and their diversity, supports the absence of stereotypy. This suggests that sounds are produced to reinforce visual communication during the day in this family. Our results also suggest that sounds recorded by hand-held fishes are produced naturally in the wild. Our study challenges past nomenclatures and demonstrates sound critical function in augmenting visual communication, advancing our comprehension of acoustic ecology in teleost species.
Research Center/Unit :
FOCUS - Freshwater and OCeanic science Unit of reSearch - ULiège AFFISH-RC - Applied and Fundamental FISH Research Center - ULiège
Disciplines :
Zoology
Author, co-author :
Banse, Marine ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Evolution > Morphologie fonctionnelle et évolutive
Hanssen, Noémie; Laboratoire de Morphologie Fonctionnelle Et Evolutive, FOCUS, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium
Sabbe, Justine; Laboratoire de Morphologie Fonctionnelle Et Evolutive, FOCUS, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium
Lecchini, David; CRIOBE, EPHE-UPVD-CNRS, USR ; PSL University, Moorea, French Polynesia ; Laboratoire d'Excellence "CORAIL", Perpignan, France
Donaldson, Terry J; University of Guam Marine Laboratory/Guam EPSCoR, UOG Station, Mangilao, Guam, USA
Myrberg AA. Sound communication and interception in fishes. In: Tavolga W, Popper AN, Fay R, editors. Hearing and Sound Communication in Fishes. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer; 1981. p. 395–426.
Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL. Principles of Animal Communication. Sunderland, England: Sinauer Associates; 1998. 601 p.
Looby A, Cox K, Bravo S, Rountree R, Juanes F, Reynolds LK, et al. A quantitative inventory of global soniferous fish diversity. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2022; 32: 581–95.
Marshall NB. Sound-producing mechanisms and the biology of deep-sea fishes. In: Marine bio-acoustics. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1967. p. 123–33.
Ali HA, Mok HK, Fine ML. Development and sexual dimorphism of the sonic system in deep sea neobythitine fishes: the upper continental slope. Deep Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap. 2016; 115: 293–308.
Parmentier E, Fontenelle N, Fine ML, Vandewalle P, Henrist C. Functional morphology of the sonic apparatus in Ophidion barbatum (Teleostei, Ophidiidae). J Morphol. 2006; 267: 1461–8.
Fine ML, Parmentier E. Mechanisms of fish sound production. In: Ladich F, editor. Sound communication in fishes. Vienna, Austria: Springer; 2015. p. 77–126.
Ladich F, Myrberg AA. Agonistic behavior and acoustic communication. In: Ladich F, Collin SP, Moller P, Kapoo BG, editors. Communication in fishes. Science Publishers; 2006. p. 122–48.
Mann DA, Lobel PS. Acoustic behavior of the damselfish Dascyllus albisella: behavioral and geographic variation. Environ Biol Fishes. 1998; 51: 421–8.
Parmentier E, Kéver L, Casadevall M, Lecchini D. Diversity and complexity in the acoustic behaviour of Dascyllus flavicaudus (Pomacentridae). Mar Biol. 2010; 157: 2317–27.
Lugli M, Torricelli P, Pavan G, Mainardi D. Sound production during courtship and spawning among freshwater gobiids (pisces, gobiidae). Mar Freshw Behav Phy. 1997; 29: 109–26.
Longrie N, Poncin P, Denoël M, Gennotte V, Delcourt J, Parmentier E. Behaviours associated with acoustic communication in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). PLoS One. 2013; 8(4).
Mélotte G, Vigouroux R, Michel C, Parmentier E. Interspecific variation of warning calls in piranhas: a comparative analysis. Sci Rep. 2016; 6(1): 1–11.
Raick X, Koussa A, Kurchevski G, Godinho AL, Parmentier E. Sounds and associated morphology of Hypostomus species from South-East Brazil. J Zool. 2022; 317: 77–91.
Banse M, Bertimes E, Lecchini D, Donaldson TJ, Parmentier E. Sounds as taxonomic indicators in holocentrid fishes. npj Biodivers. 2024; in press. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44185-024-00064-4 PMID: 39501023
Banse M, Lecchini D, Bertucci F, Parmentier E. Reliable characterization of sound features begins in open-water environments. J Acoust Soc Am. 2023; 154(1): 270–8.
Moulton JM. The acoustical behavior of some fishes in the Bimini area. Biol Bull. 1958; 114: 357–74.
Millot S, Vandewalle P, Parmentier E. Sound production in red-bellied piranhas (Pygocentrus nattereri, Kner): an acoustical, behavioural and morphofunctional study. J Exp Biol. 2011; 214: 3613–8.
Bertucci F, Parmentier E, Hillion A, Cordonnier S, Lecchini D, René-Trouillefou M. First highlight of sound production in the glassy sweeper Pempheris schomburgkii (Pempheridae). Mar Biol. 2021; 168 (32): 1–10.
Parmentier E, Boyle KS, Berten L, Brié C, Lecchini D. Sound production and mechanism in Heniochus chrysostomus (Chaetodontidae). J Exp Biol. 2011; 214: 2702–8.
Parmentier E, Vandewalle P, Brié C, Dinraths L, Lecchini D. Comparative study on sound production in different Holocentridae species. Front Zool. 2011; 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-8-12 PMID: 21609479
Winn HE, Marshall JA, Hazlett B. Behavior, diel activities, and stimuli that elicit sound production and reactions to sounds in the longspine squirrelfish. Copeia. 1964;(2): 413–25.
Horch K, Salmon M. Adaptations to the acoustic environment by the squirrelfishes Myripristis violaceus and M. pralinius. Mar Behav Physiol. 1973; 2: 121–39.
Salmon M. Acoustical behavior of the mempachi, Myripristis berndti, in Hawaii. Pacific Sci. 1967; 21: 364–81.
Banse M, Minier L, Lecchini D, Parmentier E. Acoustic mobbing behaviour: vocal fish responses to predation risk through sound communication. Mar Biol. 2024; 171(141).
Banse M, Lecchini D, Sabbe J, Hanssen N, Donaldson T, Iwankow G, et al. Production of sounds by squirrelfish during symbiotic relationships with cleaner wrasses. Sci Rep. 2024; 14(11158): 1–7.
Herald ES, Dempster RP. Courting activity in the white-lined squirrel fish. Aquarium J. 1957; 366–8.
Tricas TC, Boyle KS. Acoustic behaviors in Hawaiian coral reef fish communities. Mar Ecol. 2014; 511: 1–16.
Posit team. RStudio: integrated development environment for R. Boston, MA: Posit Software, PBC; 2023.
Thresher RE. Reproduction in reef fishes. T.F.H. Publications, Inc. Ltd.,. Neptune City, New Jersey: TFH Publications, Inc; 1984. 399 p.
Amorim MCP, Neves ASM. Acoustic signalling during courtship in the painted goby, Pomatoschistus pictus. J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom. 2007; 87: 1017–23.
Horvatić S, Malavasi S, Parmentier E, Marčić Z, Buj I, Mustafić P, et al. Acoustic communication during reproduction in the basal gobioid Amur sleeper and the putative sound production mechanism. J Zool. 2019; 309: 269–79.
Kierl NC, Johnston CE. Sound production in the pygmy sculpin Cottus paulus (Cottidae) during courtship and agonistic behaviours. J Fish Biol. 2010; 77: 1268–81.
Bertucci F. Communication acoustique chez un poisson Cichlidé: analyse expérimentale du rôle et de la structure des signaux. 2012.
Randler C, Förschler MI. Heterospecifics do not respond to subtle differences in chaffinch mobbing calls: Message is encoded in number of elements. Anim Behav. 2011; 82(4): 725–30.
Wheatcroft D, Price TD. Learning and signal copying facilitate communication among bird species. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2013; 280(1757). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.3070 PMID: 23446529
Wheatcroft D. Repetition rate of calls used in multiple contexts communicates presence of predators to nestlings and adult birds. Anim Behav. 2015; 103: 35–44.
Bertucci F, Beauchaud M, Attia J, Mathevon N. Sounds modulate males’ aggressiveness in a cichlid fish. Ethology. 2010; 116: 1179–88.
Kaatz IM, Rice AN, Lobel PS. How fishes use sound: quiet to loud and simple to complex signaling. In: Reference Model in Life Sciences: Enclyclopedia of Physiology of Fishes. New York: Elsevier; 2015. p. 1–12.
Parmentier E, Diogo R, Fine ML. Multiple exaptations leading to fish sound production. Fish Fish. 2017; 18: 958–66.